White Supremacy

[Valsuelm]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knPx-zPyLnk

 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/white-power-hand-symbol-cassandra-fairbanks-mike-cernovich-alt-right-white-house-a7709446.html

https://heatst.com/culture-wars/peta-says-milk-is-a-symbol-of-white-supremacy/

 

[Ben No.3]

I feel like an actual issue is ridiculed to an extent where no one thinks about it seriously but for many it remains a harsh reality. The American left must be very useless.

[Oerwinde]

I feel like an actual issue is ridiculed to an extent where no one thinks about it seriously but for many it remains a harsh reality. The American left must be very useless.

 

The American Left have never heard the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, because Boy assumes gender and that is cissexist.

[PK htiw klaw eriF]

The American left must be very useless.

The CPUSA is a CIA honeypot while anarchists are completely disorganized. On the plus side pic related is what we have as nazis.

 

[Valsuelm]

If that hand gesture is considered WS then Italy is the most WS country in the world.

 

The notion that if a bad guy/group is doing something then everyone that does so are like them is ridiculous. And alt-right being the trolls they are will take advantage of that. Looking forward for alt-right to show up en masse in Starbucks

 

Aren't they currently boycotting Starbucks?

[Malcador]

Did they? I thought Starbucks just shrugged at them, especially as it wasn't immigrants/refugees over veterans in the first place.

[Volourn]

Starbucks lost that fight.   They lost so much money they literally begged for the people they trashed to come back. LMAO But, typical. The mainstream media won't cover that too much because it doesn't fit their chosen plotline.

[Malcador]

Seems he resigned before making that pledge, though, announcement was Dec 1 2016 that he would leave on Apr 2. His refugee hiring promise was in mid Jan.

 

I do like this article, headline vs the correction

 

http://conservativetribune.com/hire-10k-refugees-starbucks-ceo/

 

Not even sure how it was refugees over vets, seems like two concurrent initiatives also for all that is worth. Also that refugee hiring plan was worldwide.

Edited May 2, 2017 by Malcador

[Ben No.3]

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

[Chilloutman]

to b fair if I would been vet I would not want to make shi**y overpriced 'coffee' for few bucks to bunch of hipsters anyway...

Edited May 2, 2017 by Chilloutman

[Malcador]

Really Malcador? You believe this crap from a corporation?

 

 

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

They said something along the line "we will hire refugees instead of veterans". Those a**holes.

Believe which crap? That he resigned a month earlier? Or the veteran hiring through to 2018 being separate from hiring 10k refugees worldwide?

 

Seems like nothing much to get outraged over.

[redneckdevil]

Since he was on his way out the door, could have very well been the pre-planned fall guy.

 

Believe the whole outrage was bc we was having huge unemployment problems but being sweeped under the rug and media saying that unemployment was at a low but in reality it was because they were only counting who was on unemployment. Coupled with the fact that unemployment benefits got overhauled (here at least) that u can only be on it for 6 months tops instead continuing over some years.

 

I remember seeing the CEO statement for refugees over vets, but didnt really believe it bc I read it on FB and we all know u can't believe much of what you see there.

[Malcador]

 

 

Really Malcador? You believe this crap from a corporation?

 

 

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

They said something along the line "we will hire refugees instead of veterans". Those a**holes.

Believe which crap? That he resigned a month earlier? Or the veteran hiring through to 2018 being separate from hiring 10k refugees worldwide?

 

Seems like nothing much to get outraged over.

Believing that the the backing off CEO statement and firing said CEO is not related to the outrage the CEO statement caused.

It's like saying that employee who badmouthed the company wasn't fired because of the badmouthing but for unrelated reason.

It's a PR bullcrap and I thought any intelligent person can see that.

Articles dated Dec 1 2016 have him resigning as of Apr 2 2017, so he wasn't fired due to this. Haven't found anything about them backing off though, they did pledge to up the number of veterans they'd hire in the respective project.

[Ben No.3]

Really Malcador? You believe this crap from a corporation?

 

 

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

They said something along the line "we will hire refugees instead of veterans". Those a**holes.

I am sure that America, a country so proud of its military, can take care of its veterans so that they can live a pleasant life after the incredible service they have done. I am sure those heroes won't ever required to compete for low level jobs normally only non Americans would even think about taking. And even if that were ever to happen, I am sure the American people would be smart enough to see that the problem is not the low paid worker trying to feed his family abroad or the veteran himself, but the system that refuses to pay for its soldiers and thereby creates competition and aggression amongst the workers instead of unity and solidarity. Edited May 2, 2017 by Ben No.3

[ShadySands]

On the surface that link seems to confirm what Malc said. Two separate hiring programs and Starbucks upped the numbers for their vet hiring after hitting their goal already. Sure, the backlash they got could have prompted it but it doesn't seem like they decided to go for refugees over vets.

[Gfted1]

Wait, US veterans are supposed to be "taken care of" upon leaving the military? Given jobs regardless of skill or qualification? F-yeah! I cant wait till my checks start rolling in! I'm owed back pay from '97 or so!

[Chilloutman]

Wait, US veterans are supposed to be "taken care of" upon leaving the military? Given jobs regardless of skill or qualification? F-yeah! I cant wait till my checks start rolling in! I'm owed back pay from '97 or so!

 

I assume it depends on when they leave. I my country if he service 15+ (I am not sure, something around that) years in military he is eligible for rent

[Malcador]

 

 

 

 

Really Malcador? You believe this crap from a corporation?

 

 

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

They said something along the line "we will hire refugees instead of veterans". Those a**holes.

Believe which crap? That he resigned a month earlier? Or the veteran hiring through to 2018 being separate from hiring 10k refugees worldwide?

 

Seems like nothing much to get outraged over.

Believing that the the backing off CEO statement and firing said CEO is not related to the outrage the CEO statement caused.

It's like saying that employee who badmouthed the company wasn't fired because of the badmouthing but for unrelated reason.

It's a PR bullcrap and I thought any intelligent person can see that.

Articles dated Dec 1 2016 have him resigning as of Apr 2 2017, so he wasn't fired due to this. Haven't found anything about them backing off though, they did pledge to up the number of veterans they'd hire in the respective project.

Literally 5 seconds of search

 

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/23/starbucks-hiring-veterans-after-backlash-refugee-plan

Yes, I mentioned that in my post. The refugee hiring project is still going, but will check on that later

[Malcador]

Wait, US veterans are supposed to be "taken care of" upon leaving the military? Given jobs regardless of skill or qualification? F-yeah! I cant wait till my checks start rolling in! I'm owed back pay from '97 or so!

Just don't believe them if they include a mule in the deal

[Gfted1]

I assume it depends on when they leave. I my country if he service 15+ (I am not sure, something around that) years in military he is eligible for rent

Yeah, but that comes from the government, not the private sector. Nobody owes you anything, job wise.

 

Unless its changed since I got out, a person can "retire" out of the military after 20 years and they will receive percentage of the pay of whatever rank they were when they got out.

[Hurlshort]

I'm not sure it is all that awesome to offer a bunch of crappy barrista jobs to US military men and women, but maybe that is just because I hate coffee. It really seems like something you do while trying to do something else. Which logically would seem to be a better fit for a refugee, given that they are in a transitional stage.

Edited May 2, 2017 by Hurlshot

[redneckdevil]

I'm not sure it is all that awesome to offer a bunch of crappy barrista jobs to US military men and women, but maybe that is just because I hate coffee. It really seems like something you do while trying to do something else. Which logically would seem to be a better fit for a refugee, given that they are in a transitional stage.

Your right, but at the time it was a "take care of us before them" mentality. Unemployment being low and then u have a bunch of companies trying to ride the wave of "compassion" for foreign cheap labor. Both sides throwing up tear inducing pictures of down on their luck refugees/soldiers. Where the gesture means more than the actual results.

[Ben No.3]

 

 

Really Malcador? You believe this crap from a corporation?

 

 

Wait, Starbucks gives jobs to refugees and you complain? You force me to side with big business? Damn you!

They said something along the line "we will hire refugees instead of veterans". Those a**holes.

I am sure that America, a country so proud of its military, can take care of its veterans so that they can live a pleasant life after the incredible service they have done. I am sure those heroes won't ever required to compete for low level jobs normally only non Americans would even think about taking. And even if that were ever to happen, I am sure the American people would be smart enough to see that the problem is not the low paid worker trying to feed his family abroad or the veteran himself, but the system that refuses to pay for its soldiers and thereby creates competition and aggression amongst the workers instead of unity and solidarity.

Let me google it for you.

I would bash you but I know you are just indoctrinated little kid.

 

http://bfy.tw/BYQ3

Boy, I'm attacking the fact that they are homeless.

 

 

Do bash me. I want to see you at your best! Bash me successfully, have a wonderful line of argument, backed up by tons of facts, so bulletproof I'll have no choice but to cover to the holy church of alt right

Edited May 2, 2017 by Ben No.3

[HoonDing]

"Wait, US veterans are supposed to be "taken care of" upon leaving the military? Given jobs regardless of skill or qualification? F-yeah! I cant wait till my checks start rolling in! I'm owed back pay from '97 or so!"

 

depends on how many commies u fragged

[Gfted1]

Kill a commie for mommy.