Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

[merged] Vancian Magic System and cooldowns

cooldown magic system vancian cooldowns memorization spells abilities

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
602 replies to this topic

Poll: [merged] Vancian Magic System and cooldowns (463 member(s) have cast votes)

Magic System

  1. Vancian (Memorization) (190 votes [41.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.04%

  2. Mana Pool (143 votes [30.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.89%

  3. Other (130 votes [28.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.08%

Spell Progression

  1. Individual Spells (MM->Acid Arrow->Fire Ball ->Skull Trap) (292 votes [63.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 63.07%

  2. Spells get upgraded (MM LVL 1-> MM LVL 2) (94 votes [20.30%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.30%

  3. Other (77 votes [16.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.63%

Should there be separate Arcane & Divine sides to magic?

  1. Yes (D&D) (268 votes [57.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.88%

  2. No (DA:O) (102 votes [22.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.03%

  3. Other (93 votes [20.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.09%

Vote

#1
oldmanpaco

oldmanpaco

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 126 posts
  • Location:City of Lakes
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
So this happened.

fredgiblet

Are you going to be using Vancian magic?

Obsidian Entertainment @fredgiblet Wow, I've been playing D&D since the books were colored blue and beige and I've never heard that term before. But the internet conveys knowledge. I don't want to speak for Josh, but I'm not sure if a memorization system will be a focus. Don't quote me completely on that just yet though.



Without a Vancian magic system you end up with a bunch of underpowered sorcerers running around spamming underpowered spells. It takes all strategic planning out of a magic system and turns it into a purely tactical one. Some people like it but I always thought it was lazy design. It also tends to lead to a spell progression where you upgrade your spells as opposed to getting new spells. Also lazy. The sheer number of spells in BGT is astounding and choosing which ones to memorize and when to use them was a ton of fun.

And hello mana pool!

I suppose this was expected when they talked about the soul thing. Of course I’m just speculating as nothing official has been announced.

Anyway I'm just bitter because I really like IE magical combat and I think a game made in their image should have the same basic magic system. But what do I know.

Edited by oldmanpaco, 19 September 2012 - 11:40 AM.

  • D_F, Intoxicated_Ant, Living One and 2 others like this

#2
Troller

Troller

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 283 posts
I would prefer a Vancian magic system too, but maybe they can make something nice, that wouldnt be as ****ty as other rpgs today

#3
fan

fan

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
I find it difficult to believe that rpg magic systems can be classified into "vancian" and "lazy, boring, underpowered waste of time"

While I guess we all want an interesting and tactical experience, my view is that there are superior alternatives to memorization type magic systems for PC games.

Edited by fan, 19 September 2012 - 11:23 AM.

  • kirottu, ShadySands, Lars Westergren and 17 others like this

#4
Karranthain

Karranthain

    Huscarl of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 1214 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
I prefer Vancian system as well, it brings a strategic element into the game. Otherwise it's just spam most powerful ability each encounter.

#5
Dem

Dem

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 19 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
I never really cared for the Vancian magic system, personally. I can understand if you liked choosing which spells to memorize every day, but to me it felt tedious and silly. Besides, since good games like BG and PS:T are quite unpredictable the first time you play them, I usually just settles for the combat spells anyway. You always have a use for combat spells.

That said, I would prefer if we couldn't spam underpowered spells, as you described. I like it when magic is both a hard and costly thing, but very powerful at the same time. So, a spellcaster may only have the necessary "power" to cast a handful of spells each battle, but they could tip the scale entirely, so he would have to make them count.
  • FlintlockJazz and HoneyBaked like this

#6
Ausir

Ausir

    Encyclopedist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 475 posts
  • Location:Poland
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I think Vancian magic has been overdone in all the D&D games. I'd prefer them to come up with something unique to their setting. Can you make it a poll?
  • Epsilon Rose likes this

#7
General_Disarray

General_Disarray

    Whippersnapper of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 32 posts
  • Location:Scotland
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I find it strange that you seem so upset about this, when in the very same quote that you posted, the dude says:


Don't quote me completely on that just yet though.



Secondly, why are you assuming it'll be a mana pool have they confirmed this anywhere?

Edited by General_Disarray, 19 September 2012 - 11:26 AM.


#8
oldmanpaco

oldmanpaco

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 126 posts
  • Location:City of Lakes
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I find it difficult to believe that rpg magic systems can be classified into "vancian" and "lazy, boring, underpowered waste of time"

While I guess we all want an interesting and tactical experience, my view is that there are superior alternatives to memorization type magic systems for PC games.


Such as?

#9
Jarmo

Jarmo

    (9) Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1216 posts
  • Location:Finland
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I'd much rather have some other than the memorization system.

For one, it's amazingly silly. "Today I can remember fireball 3 times and then I'll forget it".

Even in D&D I pretty much favored sorcerers over wizards, just because it gives more tactical possibilities. With a base wizard, you're stuck with whatever spells you happened to memorize and didn't cast yet. And if the memorized spells don't work, save and reload, memorize, sleep and try again with a new combo.

Nothing wrong with mana pool or whatever is used. That even makes a bit of sense, with 4th level spells being more draining than 1st level ones.
If it leads to lazy design, that's unfortunate. But I don't see why it needs to lead to something bad instead of something cool
  • Carmelle, Caerdon and Haerski like this

#10
Lord of Lost Socks

Lord of Lost Socks

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 166 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
Shamelessly promoting my own topic because it directly correlates with my own opinion on this.

http://forums.obsidi...nse-of-urgency/

It's essentially a power system similar to 4th edition D&D.

Edited by Lord of Lost Socks, 19 September 2012 - 11:32 AM.


#11
DYWYPI

DYWYPI

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 17 posts
While I have no real preference with regards to Vancian-style casting, I would like to see spell preparation being a thing, rather than just having all spells you know available at all times - for instance, a mana-based system, but one in which only your selection of X different spells (per spell level?) can be cast, changeable when resting. It allows for forward-planning and strategy in choosing which abilities your wizard will have access to in a particular day, and allows for greater flexibility and variety in the spell lists.
  • Azradesh likes this

#12
Azradesh

Azradesh

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 5 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I'd like a combination of magic systems, different systems for different schools/types of magic.

I put some of my thoughts here, what do you think?

#13
WorstUsernameEver

WorstUsernameEver

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 5869 posts
  • Location:Whateverland
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I'm not a fan of Vancian in videogames (or in tabletop for that matter, but for markedly different reasons) because I always felt like it leads to either metagaming or discourages experimenting with different tactics with your casters. As much as I thought Baldur's Gate II battles were a lot of fun, they could often devolve into using more or less the same spells into the same sequence.
  • Reddie and Epsilon Rose like this

#14
Amentep

Amentep

    Global Moderator

  • Global Moderators
  • 5250 posts
  • Location:Fawcett City
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
It should be ritual based.

Want to fire a fireball at a troll? Dance around for 3 minutes chanting while making mystic signs.

Want to stop time? Hire three other dances, dance in tandem for 7 hours and 15 minutes and slaughter a goat.

:)
  • Waywocket and Arkeus like this

#15
Tlantl

Tlantl

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 42 posts
I don't know, people have been decrying the vancian style magic system for years but no one has been able to do better. The only other system in use is mana or, in ttrpgs spell points, which when you come down to it is still a form of vancian magic only without the slots being filled from the outset.

Unlimited access to all of the spells available doesn't make a whole lot of sense from a balance perspective so we can rule that out.

Maybe if the souls thing I heard mention of is related to spells it would slowly allow greater power to be expended to fuel these spells but it would just be another form of mana.

I prefer spell slots and memorization. It would be less work for me in the long run.

#16
thracian

thracian

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 50 posts
  • Location:East Thrace
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
i like vancian system but i has its own flaws such as too weak low level mages and godly high level mages
a modified vancian would be good

i dont like it when magic is very common hence i dont want a mana system either

#17
fan

fan

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

I find it difficult to believe that rpg magic systems can be classified into "vancian" and "lazy, boring, underpowered waste of time"

While I guess we all want an interesting and tactical experience, my view is that there are superior alternatives to memorization type magic systems for PC games.


Such as?


In crpgs, I only remember ever seeing vancian or mana/cooldown based magic, and I didn't like either system very much.

What I refuse to believe is an either/or mentality like: "We can't have tactical use of a large assortment of spells if it isn't done with memorization"

My personal best shot, which took about 30 minutes to think of, is what I tried to describe as an exhaustion based system.
http://forums.obsidi...uld-magic-work/

I like to believe that Obsidian could do great things with this system, and it lends itself splendidly to a diversified character progression.
  • Lars Westergren, Reddie and Azradesh like this

#18
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 374 posts
  • Location:Precise
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
It's not necessary to have Vancian casting in order to have strong strategic gameplay (rather than just tactical gameplay). A mana pool that doesn't regenerate on its own would work like that.

Actually, in the early discussions around Dragon Age, BioWare was planning a system very much like that, where health and mana didn't regenerate on their own and repeated use of potions reduced their efficacy, and the mana potions (Lyrium) were actually going to be addictive.

I wish they'd done that.

But that's an example of how to include strategic gameplay without using Vancian casting.

As it happens, I like Vancian casting, but I know many people object to it on the grounds that it isn't credible within a game's setting, so I offer this as evidence that we can have the outcome you seek (strategy) without necessarily using this specific mechanic.
  • zlarm, FlintlockJazz, Cariannis and 1 other like this

#19
Azradesh

Azradesh

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 5 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I'd much rather have some other than the memorization system.

For one, it's amazingly silly. "Today I can remember fireball 3 times and then I'll forget it".

Even in D&D I pretty much favored sorcerers over wizards, just because it gives more tactical possibilities. With a base wizard, you're stuck with whatever spells you happened to memorize and didn't cast yet. And if the memorized spells don't work, save and reload, memorize, sleep and try again with a new combo.

Nothing wrong with mana pool or whatever is used. That even makes a bit of sense, with 4th level spells being more draining than 1st level ones.
If it leads to lazy design, that's unfortunate. But I don't see why it needs to lead to something bad instead of something cool


Memorization was never a good term for it, the "lore" behind that system was that the mage had to 'load' the magic into his head and the more powerful he was the more he could load. He didn't 'forget' the spell.

#20
oldmanpaco

oldmanpaco

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 126 posts
  • Location:City of Lakes
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
Added poll.

It's not necessary to have Vancian casting in order to have strong strategic gameplay (rather than just tactical gameplay). A mana pool that doesn't regenerate on its own would work like that.


Unless of course there were mana potions like 99% of games with a mana pool.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: cooldown magic system, vancian, cooldowns, memorization, spells, abilities

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users