Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

EDIT: Looking at it again, it was good but I would have to agree with Deraldin.

Edited by Deadly_Nightshade

"Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum."

-Hurlshot

 

 

Posted

I thought it was an interview at first. O.O

"Alright, I've been thinking. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade - make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons, what am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager. Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons. Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's gonna burn your house down! With the lemons. I'm going to to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!"

Posted

OH MY ****ING GOD

 

I SHAT BRIX

How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them.

- OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)

 

 

Posted

There was something a bit off, but ti was still forking awesome.

"My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist
I am Dan Quayle of the Romans.
I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.
Heja Sverige!!
Everyone should cuffawkle more.
The wrench is your friend. :bat:

Posted

yes! now there is hope of actually getting the

! :(
Posted

pretty bloody impressive

 

something did seem slightly off about her mouth though

when your mind works against you - fight back with substance abuse!

Posted

The face doesnt look anymore real than anything else thats been done with facial mocap the past few years. And they should have pointed out that its the face, and nothing but the face that is CG, everything else is film.

And another thing; its been real quiet about that AMD Cinema 2.0 lightroom thing at SIGGRAPH 08, that a hint that they might have faked* some of their stuff aswell.

 

 

 

 

* fake as in "we neglected to tell you that this part here is a photo and that this here is pre-rended and not realtime"

DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself.

 

Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture.

 

"I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "

Posted (edited)
And another thing; its been real quiet about that AMD Cinema 2.0 lightroom thing at SIGGRAPH 08, that a hint that they might have faked* some of their stuff aswell.

 

Yup, I was at the ATI booth and there was nothing, I even took this pic as proof:

 

SANY0013.jpg

 

 

Nvidia booth was so much better tho, they were showing off physx and GPU ray-tracing

 

SANY0023.jpg

 

I'm biased lol

Edited by Bokishi
Posted (edited)
And another thing; its been real quiet about that AMD Cinema 2.0 lightroom thing at SIGGRAPH 08, that a hint that they might have faked* some of their stuff aswell.

 

* fake as in "we neglected to tell you that this part here is a photo and that this here is pre-rended and not realtime"

I actually think this is the case, have read that somewhere, it's called "image based rendering". Also, see
for more on cinema 2.0 (also see the realted videos) and here for more on image metrics. Edited by samm

Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority

Posted

meh, it wasn't awesome after all if that was the case :)

How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them.

- OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)

 

 

Posted

There was something slightly off, but still we are spoilt now days, show that to the me of 10 yrs ago and I would of been floored, makes me think what I'm going to be see 10 years from now, presuming we aren't all dead after 2012.......

cylon_basestar_eye.gif
Posted
There was something slightly off, but still we are spoilt now days, show that to the me of 10 yrs ago and I would of been floored, makes me think what I'm going to be see 10 years from now, presuming we aren't all dead after 2012.......

 

We will be.. but it won't have anything to do with the Mayan Calender.

Fortune favors the bald.

Posted

The guys at Image Metrics have taken a lot of flak over this, so one of their guys made a post about it at CGtalk http://forums.cgsociety.org/showpost.php?p...mp;postcount=74

 

 

We did not write these captions. (e.g. "What you are about to see is a wholly computer-generated animation.") Our intention was exactly, as many of you have pointed out, to reveal that Emily's face was CG after the viewer has watched the whole "interview." The original, full-length version is here:

 

http://www.image-metrics.com/node/330

 

 

theres alot more, Id read the whole thing.

DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself.

 

Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture.

 

"I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...