@\NightandtheShape/@ Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 Erm.... You? You graphics harlot... "I'm a programmer at a games company... REET GOOD!" - Me
taks Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 bok is evil, that is all. just plain evil. taks comrade taks... just because.
samm Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 (edited) 280? Frigging waste of energy. Waiting for the first reviews of the 260 and the soon to be released atis (maximally equal to lower performance, hopefully lower energy consumption, lower price). [edit]got the numbers wrong 208 -> 280 Edited June 12, 2008 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Deadly_Nightshade Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 I might get two, depends on how expensive they are when I upgrade to a new PC. "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
mkreku Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 I'm hoping the 4870 is at least comparable to the Nvidia equivalents this time around because I am very reluctant to switching drivers again. If the 4870 can't compete, I'm going to have to bite the bullet and go back to Nvidia. I am still running games on my old X1950XTX! Of course, it hasn't buckled yet (except for Crysis), but I would love to be able to play all new games on my 1080p TV.. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Deraldin Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 Hahahahahaha! I wish. A 4870 will be about the limit for me.
samm Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 (edited) I'm hoping the 4870 is at least comparable to the Nvidia equivalents this time around because I am very reluctant to switching drivers again. If the 4870 can't competeThe way things look right now, it may be able to compete with the 260, with a lower price tag, even if nVidia lowered their recommended price today. We'll see on the 25th... All the rumors right now aren't very convincing and quite contradictory, plus, even if any of them were true, all the rumored benchmarks are made with unfinished drivers, and only the usual benchmarking programs and Crysis (plus sometimes CoD4, World in Conflict) are used which doesn't reflect the performance of games I'm interested in. Edited June 12, 2008 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Bokishi Posted June 12, 2008 Author Posted June 12, 2008 I'm still on the fence myself tbh, I'll probably need to get three of them to see any major improvement over what I got now, and I got loans to pay now Current 3DMark
Deraldin Posted June 14, 2008 Posted June 14, 2008 I'm still on the fence myself tbh, I'll probably need to get three of them to see any major improvement over what I got now, and I got loans to pay now How do you think your rig would look in red? GTX 280 review scans from PC Gamer.
Bokishi Posted June 14, 2008 Author Posted June 14, 2008 I'm still on the fence myself tbh, I'll probably need to get three of them to see any major improvement over what I got now, and I got loans to pay now How do you think your rig would look in red? GTX 280 review scans from PC Gamer. If those numbers are real then nvidia is in trouble... Current 3DMark
Deraldin Posted June 14, 2008 Posted June 14, 2008 I'm still on the fence myself tbh, I'll probably need to get three of them to see any major improvement over what I got now, and I got loans to pay now How do you think your rig would look in red? GTX 280 review scans from PC Gamer. If those numbers are real then nvidia is in trouble... Yeah. It just boggles the mind that they were apparently going to release this thing at $650. What kind of FPS do you get in Crysis at 2560 with your tri-sli'd 8800's? If these numbers are real then your setup looks to be far from obsolete. Also, where have you been for the past couple weeks? Before this topic I hadn't seen you are in a couple weeks.
Bokishi Posted June 14, 2008 Author Posted June 14, 2008 At 2560 I get about 30-50 in DX9 mode And yeah I've been out more, trying to live it up and upgrade my life instead of upgrading my rig Current 3DMark
Bokishi Posted June 16, 2008 Author Posted June 16, 2008 Aye Caramba http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=191313 Current 3DMark
Deraldin Posted June 16, 2008 Posted June 16, 2008 (edited) Wonder how much that cost... Edit: Reviews are in! Anandtech Toms Hardware Hexus Firing Squad Edited June 16, 2008 by Deraldin
angshuman Posted June 16, 2008 Posted June 16, 2008 Wow. Slower than a GX2 in majority of benchmarks. Costs $150 more. 1.4 BILLION TRANSISTORS AT 65nm => terrible yields. Doesn't appear to be a sound financial move on Nvidia's part to have released this. They should have kept it as an engineering exercise and released it a few months later in 45nm, potentially in GX2 form.
mkreku Posted June 16, 2008 Posted June 16, 2008 I'm curiously impressed and disappointed at the same time Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Walsingham Posted June 16, 2008 Posted June 16, 2008 At 2560 I get about 30-50 in DX9 mode And yeah I've been out more, trying to live it up and upgrade my life instead of upgrading my rig Must... resist... puns... "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Bokishi Posted June 16, 2008 Author Posted June 16, 2008 LOL this is almost as bad as the 9800GX2, maybe I'll go wait for the 55nm shrink later this year Current 3DMark
Deraldin Posted June 16, 2008 Posted June 16, 2008 LOL this is almost as bad as the 9800GX2, maybe I'll go wait for the 55nm shrink later this year If you only had a single 8800 GTX it wouldn't be such a bad upgrade, but your tri-sli setup is bit of a special situation.
Bokishi Posted June 17, 2008 Author Posted June 17, 2008 Yeah SLI with current-gen cards makes you next-gen, but SLI with last-gen cards (like the 8800s now) makes you current-gen, so 3-Way SLI with last-gen cards makes you current-gen and 1/2, not bad really *starts saving up* Current 3DMark
Wistrik Posted June 17, 2008 Posted June 17, 2008 Now that Intel is getting ready to release Nehalem, I'm waiting for that and it's motherboards to mature before I decide about video. Odds are I'll go with a GTX 280. By the time I'm ready, the price and die size may have been reduced. My current rig is adequate for what I'm doing, so I'm willing to wait and see.
Meshugger Posted June 17, 2008 Posted June 17, 2008 I think that i'll skip the 2xx-generation of nVidia cards. How's the next generation AMD-Ati cards doing? "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
samm Posted June 17, 2008 Posted June 17, 2008 (edited) They'll do all right, it seems. Preliminary benchmarks show a great improvent to the HD3xxx-Series. They'll be mid-range to performance cards, except the next "x2"-model (hd 4890?) that will compete with the 280 (or rather be faster than it, because HD4850 Crossfire apparently beats the 280, with lower costs and less powerconsumption - while of course still using A LOT of current). A 4850 seems to be at the level of an 9800GTX. As said, these values are still to be considered rumors even if the cards really were sold and tested, it wasn't by professionals, and with beta drivers. The 4870 will only be out with the official launch at the 25th, and some people estimate its performance close to a 260. Edited June 17, 2008 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Kaftan Barlast Posted June 20, 2008 Posted June 20, 2008 The 200-series are not dual cards are they? And so do they actually use all their ram? the 260 with 850mb of ram seems to be a friggin sweet deal. Being a CG person, I need as much memory on my card as technicly possible. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now