WITHTEETH Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 (edited) This is the response I received from Asus Bok. Will my Asus Commando P965 Motherboard be compatible with Graphic cards that use the PCI-EVersion 2.0 Specification? What version PCI-E does the Asus commando have? (PCI-E 1.0, PCI-E 1.1a, or a PCI-E 2.0) And if it is incompatible with PCI-E Version 2.0 then will Asus release a compatible BIOS, or will there be an available fix to this problem? Any and all information related you can give me would be appreciated. Thanks for you time -Stephen The board supports first revision of PCI-E. PCI-E 2.0 is only compattible with the newest Intel Chipset. Best Regards, Rob Level 3 Support Engineer Asus Technology Http://usa.asus.com Phone: (812)-282-2787 RMA: (510)739-3777 opt. 2 Thank You for using our technical support deparment. Our goal is 100% customer satisfaction from our valued customers. Please take just a moment to fill out our customer service survey. With these results we can improve our customer satisfaction and provide you with better service on your next call. Thank you for taking your time to complete this survey. http://sip.asus.com/Survey/Questionnaire/S...7092785120.aspx Im dissatisfied with there lack of answers to my questions. Im still unsure at what level the 1.0 and 2.0 PCIE slots are incompatible. They will definitely require us to plug in a power connector unlike the people with 2.0 because 2.0 pushes about 150 Watts through the slot. SLI mode will not work with Intel chipsets. Other then that I am unsure... I just want to be able to plug a PCIE 2.0 card into a PCIE 16X 1.0 slot. The PCIE 16X bandwidth still has a lot of room to get filled in before it reaches its bandwidth limit. Edited January 3, 2008 by WITHTEETH Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig
Bokishi Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 Wow Asus tech support is just as bad as those BFG liars. On a side note, this is pure BS if it is true http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA== Current 3DMark
WITHTEETH Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Good thing Im patient, if I have to wait even longer to get a good graphic card I will. I will not buy that monstrosity. Screw that double PCB design, give me a single PCB, smaller die shrink or nothing at all. I don't want heat, power or bad drivers. Im bitter now... Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig
Meshugger Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Wow Asus tech support is just as bad as those BFG liars. On a side note, this is pure BS if it is true http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA== 2 PCB's? And the suggested performance increase does not justify it either. The 8800GT or 3850HD (with crossfire) is the way to go at the moment. "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
samm Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 (edited) It's an acronym for "printed circuit board" and is the green/red/blue/brown thing on which the chips, condensators etc are soldered (?). That the GF9800GX2 comes on 2 PCBs basically means that this one "card" is actually two cards connected but using only one PCI-E interface, using power and producing head equivalent to a SLI setup. ATI's version is solved slightly better imo because it consists only of one PCB containing both GPUs. Edited January 16, 2008 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Magister Lajciak Posted January 19, 2008 Author Posted January 19, 2008 It's an acronym for "printed circuit board" and is the green/red/blue/brown thing on which the chips, condensators etc are soldered (?). That the GF9800GX2 comes on 2 PCBs basically means that this one "card" is actually two cards connected but using only one PCI-E interface, using power and producing head equivalent to a SLI setup. ATI's version is solved slightly better imo because it consists only of one PCB containing both GPUs. Thank you! So if I understand it correctly, the PCI-E interface connection means the two cards cannot communicate as effectively as if they were on the same board and the whole setup is thus slower.
samm Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 (edited) Hm, not quite, I put it a bit strange there. The two cards of the GF9800GX2 are not connected via PCI-E, but with some other connection between the two PCBs. This is not necessarily slower than if they were on the same PCB where they could communicate via some internal connection. This connected "bundle" of cards then is put into one PCI-E slot. The ATI version doesnt take up so much space vertically and probably uses less power (but this remains to see) because it's only one PCB, and the heat dissipation should be better. These are the points where I think ATI did a better job than nVidia. This dual-chip card also uses one PCI-E slot. Hope this claryfies it until the cards come out and we see what it all really means Edited January 19, 2008 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
mkreku Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 http://www.dailytech.com/GeForce+9600GT+Be...rticle10397.htm Early benchmark of a member of the ninth generation of GPU's. It sounds promising if this is just the mid-range card and it outscores the 8600 by 100%. The 9800 will probably be a monster.. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Magister Lajciak Posted January 21, 2008 Author Posted January 21, 2008 Hm, not quite, I put it a bit strange there. The two cards of the GF9800GX2 are not connected via PCI-E, but with some other connection between the two PCBs. This is not necessarily slower than if they were on the same PCB where they could communicate via some internal connection. This connected "bundle" of cards then is put into one PCI-E slot.The ATI version doesnt take up so much space vertically and probably uses less power (but this remains to see) because it's only one PCB, and the heat dissipation should be better. These are the points where I think ATI did a better job than nVidia. This dual-chip card also uses one PCI-E slot. Hope this claryfies it until the cards come out and we see what it all really means OK, this does explain it. Thanks!
Magister Lajciak Posted January 21, 2008 Author Posted January 21, 2008 http://www.dailytech.com/GeForce+9600GT+Be...rticle10397.htm Early benchmark of a member of the ninth generation of GPU's. It sounds promising if this is just the mid-range card and it outscores the 8600 by 100%. The 9800 will probably be a monster.. That is pretty amazing! I must say that I am impressed.
Pidesco Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 The 8800GS, Nvidia's answer to the 3850 is out. Here in Portugal they are priced about the same, however, I've heard that ATI might lower the 3850's price a bit. Review. "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend.
mkreku Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 It's here: They have it in store at Komplett.se. Now let's see how this rather expensive beast reviews. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Gorgon Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 I would like to see them top Nvidia again, to bring on some real competion. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
samm Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Well, they do now with the 3870x2, sort of... I don't like Crossfire/SLI setups for their drawbacks though, so this card wouldn't be an option anyway until they release drivers that (among other things) offer the possibility to create profiles, evenly distribute frames to reduce the "fake high fps/micro-stuttering" problem, come up with ways do decrease input-lag... Plus, there's always horrendous power-consumption in 3D-mode. Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Gorgon Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 mmm, I'm seriously considering forking out a respectable ammount for a new box, im still on AGPx8, maybe in a month or two there will be a viable product. When is nvidia hitting back ? Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
WITHTEETH Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 mmm, I'm seriously considering forking out a respectable ammount for a new box, im still on AGPx8, maybe in a month or two there will be a viable product. When is nvidia hitting back ? well the 9800 GX2 should come out late february. I wouldn't touch it though. Id wait for the 9800GT that should come out in March. Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig
mkreku Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 A small review of the 3870X2: http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/amd_ra...x2_performance/ Looking pretty good in DX9 at least. Not so good for DX10, but then again.. No AMD/ATI card will until their sort out their DX10 driver issues. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Janmanden Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 How can the first 9 series card be a GX2? Is the 9-series GPU really that weak that they need two of them? Yep. Well... Maybe not, but I'm guessing that Nvidia plans to strike so hard at the first launch, that the thought of ATi ever in the lead with the 3870X2 will be completely obliterated. Besides it's likely that Nvidia wants to make a new crown, now that it has been tainted by ATi.. but erm, the new 'old' 8800GT/GTS, the 256bit 512MB versions are actually using the G92 (of the 9-series).. It's a (mega-)bit confusing.. and they too have been overthrown, so.. hm.. well.. GX2!! (Signatures: disabled)
CoM_Solaufein Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 Can DX10.x cards use DX9? WinXP is the only OS I will use until Microsoft comes out with a better OS. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is StrengthBaldur's Gate moddingTeamBGBaldur's Gate modder/community leaderBaldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta testerBaldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester
WITHTEETH Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 Can DX10.x cards use DX9? WinXP is the only OS I will use until Microsoft comes out with a better OS. Yes DX10 cards are compatible with DX9. Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig
WITHTEETH Posted February 21, 2008 Posted February 21, 2008 The 9600GT is out! Its nearly as fast as my 8800GT but also nearly the same price. You can get a 8800GT for $220-260, the 9600GT's are selling for $210 at newegg. Might as well get the 8800GT. Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig
samm Posted February 22, 2008 Posted February 22, 2008 Yes, seems like a bad price considering the 8800GT and 3780... Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
Magister Lajciak Posted February 22, 2008 Author Posted February 22, 2008 Can DX10.x cards use DX9? WinXP is the only OS I will use until Microsoft comes out with a better OS. Can Windows XP be upgraded to DX10, or is DX10 exclusive to Windows Vista?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now