Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mandalore Tim

Legal Issues

wich would you choose for yourself  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. wich would you choose for yourself

    • 1. Jolee vs Revan "don't let me down you old cot"
      0
    • 2. Diciple vs Malak "is there some problem? hahahahaha"
      1
    • 3. Dooku vs Juhani "oh please Taris was a dump annyway"
      1
    • 4. Bastila vs Exile "Exile's stalks my client bf/gf Revan"
      3
    • 5. Kreia vs Obi Wan "Revan returns"
      4
    • 6. Vrook vs Nihilus "grrrr grumble. hfrrrgrll grrrr!!!"
      6
    • 7. Palpy vs Yoda "It was Sunry your honor! That admit we do
      2
    • 8. Luke vs Vader "he killed my father! I am your father!!
      4
    • 9. Kavar vs Atris "Exile's a Jedi! Sith! SHE'S a JEDI!! SITH!!!!"
      0
    • 10. demand non aligned. Atton vs Hanharr
      4


Recommended Posts

Wich jedi/sith would you have be your lawyer? Wich as prosecutor? In a trial were there was'nt a shred aw evidence too tip it either way. The case just standing on credibility and a damn good defence/prosecutor.

 

I'd pick Kreia "you want the truth!! you can't handle the truth!!!" for defence council vs Obi Wan the prosecutor "Is'nt it true we jedi shall only use the force for the good....." "OBJECTION your honor Fanboy Terms!!!" ".... that we mighty religious magicians and sword practioneers shall use this living magic..."

 

sorry about my usualy typos :">

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the words of Towelie from South Park:

 

"I've no idea what's going on"

 

 

Maybe he was high when he came up with that :(


bnwdancer9ma7pk.gif

Jaguars4ever is still alive.  No word of a lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Move along people, there is nothing to see here. :D


And by the light of the moon

He prays for their beauty not doom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there ever was a slick lawyer type in Star Wars, its Palpatine.


DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself.

 

Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture.

 

"I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wasn't kill every one in the room and walk out an option? And what were you smoking when you came up with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I understand the title of this thread now. Yes, I can see why you would want to make it legal.


OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS

ingsoc.gif

OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm SPAM or Genius, I just can't tell. So I'll ponder the question, as we retire the moment into the Sandbox Annals.


The universe is change;
your life is what our thoughts make it
- Marcus Aurelius (161)

:dragon:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...