Kaftan Barlast Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 Feel free to motivate your selection. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorth Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 My member number “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nur Ab Sal Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 Where is 7? HERMOCRATES: Nur Ab Sal was one such king. He it was, say the wise men of Egypt, who first put men in the colossus, making many freaks of nature at times when the celestial spheres were well aligned. SOCRATES: This I doubt. We are hearing a child's tale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 You left out some numbers... "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 1, 2005 Author Share Posted April 1, 2005 Yes, but I felt these number give a rather fair demographic view. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nur Ab Sal Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 This is nonsense on truly kabbalah level. HERMOCRATES: Nur Ab Sal was one such king. He it was, say the wise men of Egypt, who first put men in the colossus, making many freaks of nature at times when the celestial spheres were well aligned. SOCRATES: This I doubt. We are hearing a child's tale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
213374U Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 This is nonsense on truly kabbalah level. And yet in your whole posting history, you have failed to do better. Go figure. - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nur Ab Sal Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 Next insightful trollism. HERMOCRATES: Nur Ab Sal was one such king. He it was, say the wise men of Egypt, who first put men in the colossus, making many freaks of nature at times when the celestial spheres were well aligned. SOCRATES: This I doubt. We are hearing a child's tale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumquatq3 Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 4 8 15 16 23 and 42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
213374U Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 trollism. That ain't a word, dumbass. - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorth Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 trollism. That ain't a word, dumbass. IIRC, "ain't" isn't a word either “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
213374U Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 IIRC, "ain't" isn't a word either True. It ain't a word. It's a contraction. Geez. - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 why ain't none of your numbers prime? i like large primes. and saying ain't in a double negative contraction sort of way. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogo Ribeiro Posted April 1, 2005 Share Posted April 1, 2005 The atomic number of Be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 1, 2005 Author Share Posted April 1, 2005 why ain't none of your numbers prime? i like large primes. and saying ain't in a double negative contraction sort of way.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you give prime numbers to people like you lot, there's no telling where it might end. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Something or other Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 You left out some numbers... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You do know that there are quite a lot of numbers, right. In fact, even more than a million. Afterwrit: My favourite number is 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 You do know that there are quite a lot of numbers, right. In fact, even more than a million. >_ And here I was thinking that Kaftan had only missed about seven numbers on his poll. ;)" "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorth Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 You can't really take a number poll without 42 seriously. Besides, polls like this tends to discrimate complex numbers, which I'm sure they find quite offensive, always just the commercially viable mainstream rational numbers >_ “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 You can't really take a number poll without 42 seriously. Besides, polls like this tends to discrimate complex numbers, which I'm sure they find quite offensive, always just the commercially viable mainstream rational numbers It's already enough that they keep being called 4i's.... Oh, god what an awful joke. >_ "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 Where is 13? Where is e? Where is pi? WHERE IS -1?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorth Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 Where is e? Good question, e would definitely have been a natural number to include. Come to look at it, he does seem like a racist, only positive integers are represented >_ “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirottu Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 You can't really take a number poll without 42 seriously. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think if 42 would have been included it would win. No other number can even compete the p0\/\/3r of 42. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loof Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 Well it's natural to only include positive integers e has no place in any number poll due to it's unatural properties!! The numer I miss the most has to be the allpowerfull 2 (nothing beats the first prime that just happens to be the only even prime). Oh and 42 is overrated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 And... where is 0? P. S. Can't help to mention Euler's formula here: All the favorite numbers are harmonically merged in one formula. Amazing, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musopticon? Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 42 definetly. [captain_obvious]This has got to be the worst poll subject ever[/captain_obvious] kirottu said: I was raised by polar bears. I had to fight against blood thirsty wolves and rabid penguins to get my food. Those who were too weak to survive were sent to Sweden. It has made me the man I am today. A man who craves furry hentai. So let us go and embrace the rustling smells of unseen worlds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.ce846aae50e732dc4985eb712252381f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now