Bartimaeus Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, Zoraptor said: Don't know what Macron thought he was doing getting Trump to invite Zelensky to the WH. If you were going to lobby for the meeting you had to make sure it wasn't going to be bilateral at least, so you could try to smooth things over at the first wrinkle. A public bust up was always going to be a very, very real possibility. Zelensky isn't Macron and he isn't Starmer- his normal approach could not be better calculated to annoy someone like Trump and he very publicly said he would keep his normal approach (eg be "very direct"). It's all well and good being true to yourself or whatever platitudes people may trot out; but you should also do what is best for your country when you're its leader* and that isn't getting into a spat with its biggest supporter over the previous three years. *And that's whether or not it was a 'planned' ambush. Indeed, it's quite probably worse for Zelensky if it was planned since if it was he ended up giving them exactly what they wanted. Isn't that exactly what Macron wants, to make clear to the rest of the world (and especially Europe) that the United States is lost to them, will not help if they actually need it? I feel like that's something he's been trying to accomplish for years at this point, even during the Biden administration. Felt like that was a pretty good demonstration. 2 Quote How I have existed fills me with horror. For I have failed in everything - spelling, arithmetic, riding, tennis, golf; dancing, singing, acting; wife, mistress, whore, friend. Even cooking. And I do not excuse myself with the usual escape of 'not trying'. I tried with all my heart. In my dreams, I am not crippled. In my dreams, I dance.
Malcador Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) Shame Trump babbling like a dementia case won't hurt him an iota. Poor preparation by Zelensky and his team, should have told him to hold his tongue regardless of whatever nonsense the muppet Vance said. Seems like confusion on two parts there, at least reviewing the transcript. Vance goes on some unprompted ass kissing speech, Zelensky is arguing that diplomacy with Putin is pointless and then Vance gets stroppy. Maybe Zelensky was in a bad mood to begin with, some random journo was on his case for not wearing a suit, heh, And a start - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/state-department-terminates-us-support-ukraine-energy-grid-restoration-rcna194259 15 minutes ago, Bartimaeus said: Isn't that exactly what Macron wants, to make clear to the rest of the world (and especially Europe) that the United States is lost to them, will not help if they actually need it? I feel like that's something he's been trying to accomplish for years at this point, even during the Biden administration. Felt like that was a pretty good demonstration. Seems a bit extreme a scheme to pull off. Maybe Macron just foolishly thought it'd go smoothly Edited 18 hours ago by Malcador Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
Zoraptor Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) Don't know if it was poor prep or a (bad) plan. Zelensky must have- must have- been told how best to handle Trump. The reactions of the Ukrainian ambassador weren't exactly subtle as things were going downhill. Even if he wasn't it's not exactly rocket surgery: massage the guy's ego and talk about how ready for a deal you are in general terms. Normally you might blame Trump more but... you kind of have to deal with reality, even if you don't like it and the reality is that Trump is Trump. Zelensky behaved exactly as he said he would before the meeting and Trump reacted exactly as you'd expect. If anything it took him longer than you might expect given it was ~50 minutes and things only blew up in the last 10. 32 minutes ago, Bartimaeus said: Isn't that exactly what Macron wants, to make clear to the rest of the world (and especially Europe) that the United States is lost to them, will not help if they actually need it? I feel like that's something he's been trying to accomplish for years at this point, even during the Biden administration. Felt like that was a pretty good demonstration. Dunno, I'm fairly cynical by nature especially when it comes to geopolitics and I find it difficult to believe that was what Macron wanted- too much risk of a permanent break occurring, and Macron talks a good talk* but is inherently risk averse. Might make sense if he's already written Ukraine off as a lost cause, but I can't really see that. *one of the funnier things is reading breathless headlines like "Macron to send troops to Ukraine!!!" and checking the context to find that he actually said he'd send troops, if there was a ceasefire and international agreement accepting them. So, not sending them any time soon in other words. Also stuff like planning to spend 5% of GDP on defence; easy for him to say, but Not Going to Happen. Edited 18 hours ago by Zoraptor 1
Malcador Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
BruceVC Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Zoraptor said: Don't know if it was poor prep or a (bad) plan. Zelensky must have- must have- been told how best to handle Trump. The reactions of the Ukrainian ambassador weren't exactly subtle as things were going downhill. Even if he wasn't it's not exactly rocket surgery: massage the guy's ego and talk about how ready for a deal you are in general terms. Normally you might blame Trump more but... you kind of have to deal with reality, even if you don't like it and the reality is that Trump is Trump. Zelensky behaved exactly as he said he would before the meeting and Trump reacted exactly as you'd expect. If anything it took him longer than you might expect given it was ~50 minutes and things only blew up in the last 10. Dunno, I'm fairly cynical by nature especially when it comes to geopolitics and I find it difficult to believe that was what Macron wanted- too much risk of a permanent break occurring, and Macron talks a good talk* but is inherently risk averse. Might make sense if he's already written Ukraine off as a lost cause, but I can't really see that. *one of the funnier things is reading breathless headlines like "Macron to send troops to Ukraine!!!" and checking the context to find that he actually said he'd send troops, if there was a ceasefire and international agreement accepting them. So, not sending them any time soon in other words. Also stuff like planning to spend 5% of GDP on defence; easy for him to say, but Not Going to Happen. It definitely wasnt what Macron wanted, EU leaders would have wanted Trump and Zelensky to get on and find agreement The main reason the meeting failed was that no one had prepared Zelensky for how to engage with Trump, there is well known strategy on how you engage with Trump and Zelensky was clearly not aware of this Then translation was a problem when Zelensky tried to explain certain things Personally I think its a huge mistake for Ukraine to not take the mineral deal, they have more chance of finding a peace deal with Russia with this type of US investment than alienating the US now I hear lots of EU countries saying " we stand by Ukraine " but are they going to continue to fund Ukraine in the same way as the US was? And then I also dont think there is any military solution for Ukraine and the best way forward for Ukraine is to accept its lost the illegally annexed regions and agree to not join NATO But now the war will drag on This was a lost opportunity for Ukraine to preserve most of its country and end the war Edited 15 hours ago by BruceVC "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela
Elerond Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 hours ago, Malcador said: Maybe Zelensky was in a bad mood to begin with, some random journo was on his case for not wearing a suit, heh, He was not random reporter but MAGA superstar Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend and MAGA insider. So he was there to do MAGA team's bidding. It was also interesting how also TASS's reporter was allowed in the Oval room, when so many other reporter got denied. But maybe it isn't that surprising when taking in account that Trump gave speech how badly and unfairly US press write about Putin during his first term.
Elerond Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, BruceVC said: Personally I think its a huge mistake for Ukraine to not take the mineral deal, they have more chance of finding a peace deal with Russia with this type of US investment than alienating the US now Zelensky was there to sign it but for some reason he was forced to ensure humiliation ritual anticipatory press meeting where people usually shortly tell what they except from that days discussions. But Trump for some reason made that event much longer than it usually is, take his time to praise Putin, which is quite rude considering that he was meeting president of country that Putin has invaded, then his ally in press score asks why Zelensky disrespects US by not fearing suite and Vance praises Russia's diplomacy, in which Zelensky maybe unwisely comments what kind of diplomacy Vance is speaking, which lead Vance and Trump shouting Zelensky how ungrateful he is. Even after that Zelensky was willing to sign the mineral deal, but Trump kicked him out. So there was no deal to be made, this was show to Trump supporters to put blame on Zelensky for his failure to make peace in Ukraine as soon as he become president which he said he will do during his campaign. So Zelensky had already lost US when Trump was elected, there was nothing that he could really have done but surrendered to please Trump, but even that option would have alienated US. Quote I hear lots of EU countries saying " we stand by Ukraine " but are they going to continue to fund Ukraine in the same way as the US was? EU already has funded Ukraine more than US (132.3 billion euros vs 114.2 billion euros) has, and even in military aid they are about equal (62 billion euros vs 64 billion euros). EU can double the support easily if they want considering that it is less than 1% of their GDP, it is more about question how difficult is to do because EU has members that support Russia and who are now empowered by USA to block all support for Ukraine. Edited 11 hours ago by Elerond 1 1
uuuhhii Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago seem to be the munich conference strategy less convincing this time
Lexx Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago This white house crap convinced me to finally donate to the ukraine defense fund. Might turn this into a monthly donation. "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
Malcador Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 6 hours ago, Elerond said: He was not random reporter but MAGA superstar Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend and MAGA insider. So he was there to do MAGA team's bidding. It was also interesting how also TASS's reporter was allowed in the Oval room, when so many other reporter got denied. But maybe it isn't that surprising when taking in account that Trump gave speech how badly and unfairly US press write about Putin during his first term. Apparently Trump was also irked by his attire. Guess it doesn't matter when it's Musk. Being MTG's boyfriend still doesn't elevate him from rando. 10 hours ago, BruceVC said: The main reason the meeting failed was that no one had prepared Zelensky for how to engage with Trump, there is well known strategy on how you engage with Trump and Zelensky was clearly not aware of this Then translation was a problem when Zelensky tried to explain certain things Language seemed to be the issue. I am still puzzled where the disrespect in Zelensky's part is, well unless Vance was sticking up for Putin. Getting a kick out of people thanking Trump for defending the US though. Ukraine really needs one good diplomat, they've always had ones saying stupid crap, like Melnyk. I believe Yelnak was the guy behind this meeting as well, apparently Kellogg disagrees (source is NYP though...) Edited 4 hours ago by Malcador 1 Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
HoonDing Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I'd rather be Ukrainian than a Republican. 1 The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
BruceVC Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 34 minutes ago, Malcador said: Apparently Trump was also irked by his attire. Guess it doesn't matter when it's Musk. Being MTG's boyfriend still doesn't elevate him from rando. Language seemed to be the issue. I am still puzzled where the disrespect in Zelensky's part is, well unless Vance was sticking up for Putin. Getting a kick out of people thanking Trump for defending the US though. Ukraine really needs one good diplomat, they've always had ones saying stupid crap, like Melnyk. I believe Yelnak was the guy behind this meeting as well, apparently Kellogg disagrees (source is NYP though...) Yes the whole " disrespect " point is exaggerated Part of it is because Zelensky wasnt wearing a suit and then he referred to Vance as JD instead of vice-president and then he didnt thank the US enough for previous aid but none of this was intentional or deliberate disrespect But English translation was the biggest misunderstanding, he should have used a translator and hopefully if he goes back he will "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela
Also gorgon Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago It seemed intentional, like Zelinskyy was supposed to buckle because Trump figured it would be way easier than getting Putin to move. Trump overestimated his leverage and now he just looks like a fool who isn't qualified for these types of negotiations.
Lexx Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago He looks like a fool to us. MAGAs are eating it up and talk about how "real" it was, etc. 1 1 "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
Elerond Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Malcador said: Being MTG's boyfriend still doesn't elevate him from rando. I meant with that his questions come from White House, instead being actually journalistic questions. So when he questioned Zelensky about his attire, that question come from Trump and co, instead being some silly question from random journalist 1
Zoraptor Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 11 hours ago, Elerond said: Zelensky was there to sign it but for some reason he was forced to ensure humiliation ritual anticipatory press meeting.. Forced? Doesn't seem like Zelensky was marched in at gunpoint. He could have said no to the press conference- it would hardly have turned out worse. He could have grinned and borne it instead of reacting. He could have decided to have someone else there as well, or to use translators to slow things down, or to try and wind things up. Once again, Zelensky said that was going to be his approach beforehand, and Trump reacted exactly as you'd expect him to. Can anyone actually say that they thought a "very direct" approach to Donald Trump was a good idea? They'd done the hard work by making the minerals agreement utterly nebulous, he only had to make it through the signing It's all very well talking about ambushes and humiliation and implying that Zelensky was brave and stuck to his guns or whatever but that ignores that Ukraine needs the US while the US does not need Ukraine. Doesn't matter if that is an unpalatable fact, it is a fact.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now