Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Curious, why didn't you release pillars as 1.1?


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1
gristlethick

gristlethick

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Well I guess that I have to ask what caused you to release this game too early. Not enough funding? Wanting to just get done with it? I figured you'd have enough funding. If there was proper funding then there's no hard time constraints right?

 

Seeing what you did with 1.1 and seeing free dlc being pumped out. The game will just continue to get better. And 1.1 was a huge leap forward in itself.

 

The method you used here seems to be a method of self harm? I imagine if you had a more complete game at release then the initial surge of fanfare would have carried sales further as it becomes almost a viral meme or something.

 

I don't get it. I love the game though.



#2
Wormerine

Wormerine

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2373 posts
  • Location:Poznan
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I have been wondering about it as well. Not angering fans by delaying the release further? Need to keep the schedule going (base release, DLCs). When Deadfire released, I don’t remember anything else going on, which meant it was good time to release. Maybe the count that every DLC released will give Deadfire another shot at sales?

#3
Mannock

Mannock

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 478 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer

Well I guess that I have to ask what caused you to release this game too early. Not enough funding? Wanting to just get done with it? I figured you'd have enough funding. If there was proper funding then there's no hard time constraints right?
 
Seeing what you did with 1.1 and seeing free dlc being pumped out. The game will just continue to get better. And 1.1 was a huge leap forward in itself.
 
The method you used here seems to be a method of self harm? I imagine if you had a more complete game at release then the initial surge of fanfare would have carried sales further as it becomes almost a viral meme or something.
 
I don't get it. I love the game though.


Cause at some point you have to take the plunge. A lot of the stuff found and noticed, wouldn't have been found without the huge player base jumping into the game. There would never have been the 1.1 you see today, even if you had waited until today to release the game. It would more or less have been 1.0 as you saw it when it was released.


And on a side note; is Deadfire the first cRPG a lot of people have played? Cause judging by the posts on the forums the expectations of 1.0 seem to be way out of proportion. No cRPG is perfect at release. That's my experience of games like these going back to the early 90's.
  • Night Stalker, illathid, Heijoushin and 5 others like this

#4
Rhaeg

Rhaeg

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 117 posts
  • Location:The Hague, NL
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

The game was already pushed back for a bit once; what reactions do you think a second delay would have caused?


  • Mikeymoonshine likes this

#5
antman45454

antman45454

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 99 posts

@op

 

Yeah ive been really surprised by how they have handled the release as well for the same reasons you mentioned.

 

People can speculate and only people who work at obsidain would know.

 

One thing i know for sure though is because its a crowd funded game and not funded by a publisher or an IP holder they are not under any of there constraints and are accountable to know one but themselves.

 

This has probably allowed them to be able to get away with doing this. I dont think an investor would ever let them get away with it.



#6
Night Stalker

Night Stalker

    Cynic of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 353 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

@op

 

Yeah ive been really surprised by how they have handled the release as well for the same reasons you mentioned.

 

People can speculate and only people who work at obsidain would know.

 

One thing i know for sure though is because its a crowd funded game and not funded by a publisher or an IP holder they are not under any of there constraints and are accountable to know one but themselves.

 

This has probably allowed them to be able to get away with doing this. I dont think an investor would ever let them get away with it.

 

Unless of course the investor wanted the game shipped on a certain date come hell or high water - like when Obsidian had to chop up large parts of Kotor II: The Sith Lords ending because Lucars Arts wouldn't give them an extension on their agreed development time (as was their right, to be fair):

 

But however valiant the team's efforts, Knights of the Old Republic 2 would not be properly finished - "broken", the team implores polite old me - and asking LucasArts for an extension was out of the question. "There would have been substantial penalties had we not have made that date," Avellone tells me. But LucasArts isn't the Sith Lord in all of this, the Obsidianites are quick to point out.

(Source)



#7
wRAR

wRAR

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 110 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Why didn't they also release PoE1 at 3.0?


  • bugarup, Haplok, illathid and 5 others like this

#8
Wormerine

Wormerine

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2373 posts
  • Location:Poznan
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Why didn't they also release PoE1 at 3.0?

Why didn't they release PoE1 with White March1&2?


  • Epimetreus likes this

#9
KDubya

KDubya

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1502 posts
  • Deadfire Backer

@op

 

Yeah ive been really surprised by how they have handled the release as well for the same reasons you mentioned.

 

People can speculate and only people who work at obsidain would know.

 

One thing i know for sure though is because its a crowd funded game and not funded by a publisher or an IP holder they are not under any of there constraints and are accountable to know one but themselves.

 

This has probably allowed them to be able to get away with doing this. I dont think an investor would ever let them get away with it.

 

 

Just because there was some Kickstarter money does not in any way mean that there were no financial pressures to release and get the influx of sales money into the company.

 

A company has payroll, office rent, insurance and all the other operating expenses that are not funded by the Kickstarter funds. Kickstarter seems more like a sort of marketing scheme rather than a method of bankrolling game development.

 

The game was perfectly playable at release so what is the reason to have held off release for some balance patch? I agree that the gameplay is much better now than at release but its pretty standard for games to improve dramatically post-launch, I just perused through my Steam and GoG libraries and I don't see a single game that was released and never updated or changed after launch.


  • rheingold and Stephen Unsworth-Mitchell like this

#10
Stephen Unsworth-Mitchell

Stephen Unsworth-Mitchell

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 146 posts
  • Deadfire Backer

Got remember there whole market of other games so got find window for said produce that's what you feel is best chance for it.

 

There fact it had original date and had already been moved back once and keep moving goal post probably would start annoying customers.

 

There financial reasons to release game earlier then perfect package.

 

There really big point most artist will understand you can keep working on something and it can become never ending cycle, at some point got say yeah it's time.

 

This was crowd funded but it does have publisher and I personally don't know but publisher could said they wanted it done by set date.

 

Lot issues are not discovered until someone with different mind set finds ways to abuse system or finds unique ways doing things.

 

I find it so very funny that people come on this board and then behave like POE franchise is only franchise to behave in these ways. Most games come out with issues. Obsidian not only company bring game out late. Most companies make new content for there games, some abuse this by forcing microtransactions. Stop it with rose tinted glass please. 

 

Games have become lot bigger then they ever were in past which gives lot space for issues.

 

There the point of computers are made from lots of different components manufactured by lots different companies with lots of software that created by lots companies and multiple systems eg windows linex etc. So its very hard to know what effects those things will have on game till after release. Hence lot of companies prefer game system as it much easier to write game for game system then it is for pc.


Edited by Stephen Unsworth-Mitchell, 14 June 2018 - 04:30 AM.


#11
tinysalamander

tinysalamander

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 435 posts

The game was perfectly playable at release so what is the reason to have held off release for some balance patch?


I wouldn't use the world “perfectly” here… :biggrin:


  • Carmir likes this

#12
Judicator

Judicator

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 249 posts

 

@op

 

Yeah ive been really surprised by how they have handled the release as well for the same reasons you mentioned.

 

People can speculate and only people who work at obsidain would know.

 

One thing i know for sure though is because its a crowd funded game and not funded by a publisher or an IP holder they are not under any of there constraints and are accountable to know one but themselves.

 

This has probably allowed them to be able to get away with doing this. I dont think an investor would ever let them get away with it.

 

The game was perfectly playable at release

You cannot be serious.



#13
Purudaya

Purudaya

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 181 posts

 

 

@op

 

Yeah ive been really surprised by how they have handled the release as well for the same reasons you mentioned.

 

People can speculate and only people who work at obsidain would know.

 

One thing i know for sure though is because its a crowd funded game and not funded by a publisher or an IP holder they are not under any of there constraints and are accountable to know one but themselves.

 

This has probably allowed them to be able to get away with doing this. I dont think an investor would ever let them get away with it.

 

The game was perfectly playable at release

You cannot be serious.

 

 

It *was* perfectly playable. I (and the vast majority of other customers) played it from beginning to end.  Whether or not it was properly balanced or perfect as a game is a whole other debate, but to argue that a game is 'broken' or 'unplayable' just because its difficulty or some other factor isn't well optimized is grandstanding. PoE2 was flawed at release just as PoE1 was flawed at release, but that doesn't mean it was unplayable.

Unplayable = cannot be played. It's an objective term.

Unenjoyable, unsatisfying, unbalanced, etc. might be what you're looking for, but any game that can be completed from beginning to end is by definition playable.


Edited by Purudaya, 15 June 2018 - 04:10 AM.

  • Haplok, Mannock, illathid and 1 other like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users