Amentep

Dear god.../hug/ hahaha! Well I knew the job was dangerous when I volunteered for it. But my that was...a very different weekend. Still didn't really justify some of the stuff people did IMO - angry over the announcement or not. It did answer the age old question of how quickly users could post animated gifs of FOBOS producer Chuck Cuevas having horrible things happen to him, though.

I think Fallout Rage threads exist wherever Fallout Threads exist. I still have "fond" memories of the weekend after Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel was announced back when I was still a mod for Interplay...

In my case my computer still isn't up to snuff to play modern games.

I think its an "extreme example", not actually a reflection of you or your post.

That's confirmed? That's a real bummer; makes you wonder why they did not have him record a generalized intro (loosely usable for New Vegas, or something else), while they had him in the studio. Huh? No, it isn't. I don't honestly know why mkreku mentioned it. I think because a few pages back someone had said something along the lines of it not being a Fallout game if Perlman didn't do an intro.

I'll buy it on a console.

I enjoyed the Black Cauldron when I saw it many years ago at the theater when it came out. I remember being upset seeing the production art for it after THE FOX AND THE HOUND came out and thinking it'd never be done (Disney had, of course, announced that they were leaving animation behind. It was around this time that they started the Disney "PG Initiative" that gave us Watcher in the Woods and The Black Hole) I like all forms of animation; I'd hate to think of Disney foregoing traditional animation entirely (just as I'd hate to think that no one would do stop motion animation like Henry Selick as well)

Disney said that both Lilo and Stitch and Princess and the frog were their last hand drawn animations They shut down their animation studio after THE FOX AND THE HOUND, with preproduction on the Black Cauldron already underway.

I hate myself already.

Its not a 50/50 chance at that point? Nope. The way its set up each door has a 1/3 chance to have a car. When the player picks a door their door has a 1/3 chance of having the car, as do the other two. So the player's door has a 1/3 chance to have the car, while the remaining doors have 2/3. When Monty Hall reveals the door with the goat amid the other two, it means that the 2/3 chance the other two have are now with the door that didn't have a goat and that the player didn't pick. So the player will win a car by switching 2/3 of the time, compared to the 1/3 if he stays.

Unambiguous Monty Hall Problem: "Suppose you're on a game show and you're given the choice of three doors [and will win what is behind the chosen door]. Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats [unwanted booby prizes]. The car and the goats were placed randomly behind the doors before the show. The rules of the game show are as follows: After you have chosen a door, the door remains closed for the time being. The game show host, Monty Hall, who knows what is behind the doors, now has to open one of the two remaining doors, and the door he opens must have a goat behind it. If both remaining doors have goats behind them, he chooses one [uniformly] at random. After Monty Hall opens a door with a goat, he will ask you to decide whether you want to stay with your first choice or to switch to the last remaining door. Imagine that you chose Door 1 and the host opens Door 3, which has a goat. He then asks you "Do you want to switch to Door Number 2?" Is it to your advantage to change your choice?" The answer is "yes, it is to your advantage to change your choice"

To be fair, a lot of mathematicians and statisticians are utterly clueless when it comes to the Monty Hall problem/fallacy. It's awesome. Yes, yes it is awesome. That doesn't help that reading through this thread reminded me of that long lost, grand time.

It can't really be argued IMO that he wouldn't have plead guilty if he'd known what sentence he'd have gotten because we actually don't know what sentence he'd have gotten, since he never got his final sentence. He fled the country rather than face that. Just because the judge mentioned that something was possible doesn't mean that it would have actually happened (and arguably he'd have had ground to appeal, depending on what had been brokered in the deal).

There's been a lot said about the mother and Polanski; according to the girls testimony though Polanski asked her and her mom if it was okay for Polanski to use her as a model for Polanski's photography; later they arranged a time for him to do so where the incident in question happened. "Cheating into confessing"? He plea bargained to a lesser charge. Whether he did this simply to avoid jail time as he claims, there's no indication that his plea was coerced; the problem from Polanski's perspective has always been the sentencing (this was in fact what the Swiss court wanted to investigate and when they didn't get records from the US Justice Dept they let him go; Polanski claims that his original sentence was to 90 days psychiatric evaluation; he didn't serve all of it at which point the judge suggested that having him serve the rest of the time in jail and an agreement that Polanski would leave the country as opposed to transferring the evaluation time to time served on his sentence along with some probation time. Instead of attending the final sentencing, Polanski fled the country).

What would they rather had? More bobbleheads? Bubblegum cards? Tragic the Garnering decks? Stuffed marsupials?

The victim was 13 and given champagne and quaaludes prior to Polanski's sexual activities; I'm personally not comfortable not calling that rape.

the smurfs predate blue meanies by about a decade... possibly the young beatles were disturbed by the evil little belgian faeries... kinda likes how some kids is 'fraid o' clowns? *shrug* never made the connection. There's a lot of conflicting information about the Blue Meanies in Yellow Submarine - including some indication that they were originally not intended to be just blue. But I think their design was down to Heinz Edleman (who would have been in his last year at the D

Oh god, I'm having flashbacks to trying to explain the "Monty Hall problem" back on BIS...

No problem, glad to help.

Never read it, but the internet tells me it was a guy having a relationship since they were young with his twin sister. This continued even after the sister married (and all the kids during the marriage were actually fathered by her brother, she terminated the one from her husband)

David Gaider responds

*cough* A song of ice and fire *cough* Yeah, that was actually referenced in the Bio thread.

It reminds me a bit when a movie trailer hits the screens (or net) and people complain about the CGI while not bothering to realize that the CGI in movies is usually finished weeks (if not days) before the release and whatever is in the trailer - which is compiled months beforehand - is (baring a total lack of funding) not what is going to be in the final product. They are early screenshots. I'd be a lot more concerned (not really, but its the best word I can come up with) if those were new screenshots and it was being released today.

He could via the mouse and cut & paste...