Amentep

I haven't seen the original since it's release, I wasn't particularly bowled over by it enough to remember more than the basic premise, would I need to rewatch it, or could I go into the new one with just the basic knowledge? Do not watch the theatrical cut then. There have been a few different Directors Cut editions released. They are much better. Ridley Scott didn't have the juice to tell the studio heads to bugger off when they were screwing up his movie in 1986. 1982, surely?

Yup, it is. Been great fun to see.

Well I "was" mystified - I'd say the last few years have seen a great upsurge in Soccer's success, from the the attention MLS has received to networks like NBC showing English and German league games in the afternoon.

Baseball is a great lazy afternoon sport. You can put as little or as much attention as you want into it and be rewarded. I also am surprised Rugby isn't more popular (but then for years I was mystified about the lack of interest in Soccer/Football).

My favorite Opossum encounter was at night, walking in the front gate, it was sitting on the fence a few feet away hissing at me. Good times, good times. They're generally pretty cool animals if you keep your distance, to be fair, though.

Florida State was one of the biggest complainers about the Tomahawk Chop since it was stolen from them... The old Brave's 'Screaming/Shouting/Laughing Indian' logos and mascot Chief Knoc-A-Homa, his "teepee", and Princes Win-A-Lotta did get complaints, hence why they were dropped circa 1986.

Dibs on locking threads that derail via spamming.

Thread is closed; in the future please respond to posts, not discussing each other, psychoanalyzing reasons for posting, etc. If you don't like a way another poster operates, please report the relevant thread to the mods rather than trying to pick an argument with the poster or intentionally derail their topics.

Thread closed, refreshed and renewed thread now available for your conveinence.

All your politcs, in one place.

If you claim it from the giveaway thread you can always use the "...well, I was given that game..." defense.

AFAIK, there were earlier films that used the techniques seen in Kane prior to Wells (some of it in the German Expressionists who influenced everybody). So it wasn't as inventive as it was transformative; as it helped form the language of cinema into a recognizable whole.

And then some! Ive also never seen: Gone With the Wind, Casablanca, Its a Wonderful Life, Citizen Cane, etc. *runs* "Kane"

CNN is reporting his death confirmed by a spokesperson for the family.

CBS is reporting that Tom Petty has passed away after suffering cardiac arrest: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tom-petty-legendary-rocker-is-dead-at-66/?linkId=43025457 This video was always memorably trippy:

I think (and am no expert) that a true Toby Jug would need to be a jug (ie have a spout designed for pouring, often in the form of a tricorn hat) and be designed with a seated figure (or alternatively, the head of a king). I think the monk would just be a "character mug".

Its because CBS is launching their own streaming service, and they want to encourage sign-ups for that service by grabbing the one group that has always been expected to follow their show where-ever it goes: Star Trek fans.

I was a bit surprised about people not groking dotard as well. But then I enjoy learning new words (I sometimes post here when I do).

Didn't something like that bugger up the hd release of Buffy, the tried to convert the original 4:3 to 16:9 and messed up the scene structure, plus the original effects were over compensated digitally. If the TV show wasn't shot native in 16:9, they end up cropping a 4:3 at the top and bottom which can stuff up framing (very noticible in close-ups) and show a lot of grain on effects shots since they get processed multiple times - as I understand it. Babylon 5 suffers from this (and weirdly too, as allegedly it was shot in 16:9, but instead of going back and remastering the original negatives, they took the TV image and cut it down). I think Buffy might encounter a similar problem (particularly as, I don't think the early seasons were shot for wide-screen). Not to mention all that work for The Motion Picture of all things. I'm that rare person who actually likes TMP though...IMO there can't be enough minutes devoted to lovingly panning up and down the model of the Enterprise. I keed, I keed - I do like TMP but sometimes its despite itself.

Given that this thread has been several pages of the same territory as the political thread and we already have a political thread, I'm closing this thread in favor of the existing thread.

They're in Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Maryland, Mississippi, Virginia, West Virginia and Alabama in addition to the Carolinas.

As I understand it, the order for print is master negative for the film (the one that is used to make the master interpositive), the master interpositive (that's used to make the master positive) or the master positive. As long as one has managed to escape vinegar sydrome, you can probably make a pretty decent print of the film. After that you get workprints (a positive made without an interpositive), video editing screeners, etc. If all else fails, you bung whatever you got into whatever conversion/editing suit you have, do the best you can and put a note before the film letting the audience know that the master is missing and this is the best you can do picture wise. One thing to be careful of, is that there are a number of cases of modern analog to digital film transfers stuffing up "day for night" shots by auto correcting them back to day. Awkward. An example of the analogue vs digital - Paramount rereleased all of the original Star Trek films on BluRay, but they didn't re-release the "Director's cut" of The Motion Picture - because the special effects were all digitally done and would need to be completely redone for BluRay but the original film release required no additional work.

Can't they just hold the phone in front of your phase and yell "boo!"?