MrBrown

Is it some kind of fact that Blizzard is losing fans, aka buyers? Or is this the usual logic of: I don't like the game = others don't like the game = they're losing fans!

Here? Yes. In the world? Lots of people. That's just a renamed demo. It's nice that it allows to try some basic multiplayer but the full game is still blizzard-overpriced. Some retailers had it at about 10-20 US$ or EU? on release, and it's been on sale at various places since. You'd have to do a bit of searching, though.

For those thinking about playing SC2, there's a free "starter edition": https://eu.battle.net/account/sc2/starter-edition/index.xml

More significant than anything in DA2? But, it's all speculative.

Dunno about Craster, but since they're only going to have 10 eps per season, they're going to have to ax a lot of stuff or spread one book over more than one season. Which they don't seem to be doing, since GRRM wrote an ep for season2 that happens in late book 2.

Bioware has said it's a few hours long.

What 4% are you referring to? 13% who play default shepard 83% who custom, including the ones who play femshep 100-83-13 = 4 So what does the 4% do? Quit the game before character creation?

http://www.vg247.com/2011/07/19/loving-fem...-steps-forward/ The only thing I want to know is, what does the 4% do?

Bioware is going to reveal or something the first story-DLC at san diego comic con, 21st-24th of july. I think there's supposed to be a trailer before that, though.

I bet the new guy is the gay love interest.

Also: http://videos.nymag.com/video/What-If-Game...9ZH3&t=What If 'Game of Thrones' Was a Buddy Comedy?

Fire cannot kill a dragon... or burn her hair, apparently.

Nah, he's more like "Yay, I get to do cool stuff cause I'm king!".

Charles Dance and Peter Dinklage not good enough for you?

I though it was rather corny compared to how it was portrayed in the book. In any case, if that kind of magicky stuff works for you, you'll love the rest of the series.

Kinda pointless with one ep to go, and a year's(?) wait after that.

Watching game of thrones with nonreaders From: http://www.reddit.com/r/gameofthrones/comm...ith_nonreaders/

The hexes, one unit per hex, and 2 movement points per unit together are enough to make Civ5 a better game than 4 in my book. Warring was really tedious in 4.

DA:O Ultimate has all the DLC except for promotional items that were available if you bought from specific shops and the like. Most likely Bioware was restricted by the contracts made with said retailers. When the ME2 ultimate edition, or whatever it ends up being called, comes out, we'll see whether Bioware/EA has changed said contracts.

The Exiled Prince came only with the Signature Edition (aka collector's edition). The Black Emporium DLC was the free DLC available on release. You can still buy both separately, of course.

The robotic dog will probably work like the dog in DA2, meaning you summon him and he fights for you as an extra party member.

Yes, exactly, it's not even good as pornography. It's just embarrassing. Then perhaps you could... not make the scene take place in a brothel with two hookers getting it on?? It's a stupid scene. Except they're trying to have fidelity to the book, and the scene probably took place in a brothel in the book. I think there's one MUCH later in the series where the queen gets it on with one of the other noble ladies after . The lesbian whore training scene wasn't in the books. EDIT: Neither the sex or Littlefinger's monologue.

If you do not watch the new ep, MrBrown, son of MrBrown, will cut off your manhood and feed it to the goats.

Common numbers thrown around in psychology is that a person's adult personality is determined by 50% genes, 40% peer-relationships (starting from childhood), and 10% by parent upbringing. There's no research basis for these exact numbers, but they're used to point out the huge effect of genes, and the much-lower-than-commonly-expected effect of parenting. Also, in addition to what Blank said, while attachment does begin really early on, humans are very responsive to changes and children will not be extremely traumatized even if their caretaker suddenly changes. I remember doing some course work on this, and reading in some research that poor parent-child attachment only explained 10%-15% of teenage behavioral problems. The general trend seems to be, that while having good early attachment and good parenting is good for the child's development, it's not a huge factors (as compared to poor attachment and not so-good-parenting, NOT compared to completely socially deprived, "locked in the cellar" cases). (BTW, I'm a psychology major, but developmental psychology is definitely not my main interest.)