Diogo Ribeiro

I must now go and assassinate my alternate self so it will never become like me and corrupt his own timeline.

And another Role-Player. It's like some alternate dimension!

^I actually saw that part of that movie but don't remember ever seeing the rest.

The picture scans gave me the chills. It's looking vewy, veeewy good.

Well that's a different story, isn't it?

:: threads lightly ::

Waaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

I "heard" more than 13 million.

An army of V's!

Blah blah blah. Some people like Diablo, some don't. Some call it an RPG, some don't. Some play it, some don't. Everybody wins either way On a related note, just how much has the Diablo series sold over the years?

I'd say Brujah.

Fixed

Actually a Diablo sequel set in a 3D gameworld doesn't sound that bad. But I'm more receptive to Hellgate: London which reportedly has Diablo-styled gameplay but has a more interesting setting.

I think what I enjoy more about Frappr is clicking on someone's picture and being place right in the middle of the ocean.

There were some pretty disappointing aspects surrounding the movie that somewhat put me off. After I read this article showcasing the 'creative differences' between Alan Moore and the directors, I found myself seriously not caring much for it. Then there's the whole deal of V being an unknown person troughout the novel, yet the actor who will play him - Hugo Weaving - has already been revealed. I think a better way to combine both successful hype and a semblance of adherence to the comics would be to not reveal who the actor was until the film had been released. Or ever.

I have to agree with that assessment and confess that unfortunately I fell prey to this. I was given a celular phone under the pretense that it would be helpful (not that it would make my life easier - to get that, I'd have to be blasted off the planet). And it really was useful during the first months but then it started to become more of a problem. The credit, the battery, having to lug it around, etc., and all for what basically amounted to the type of situations you describe. However, I should also point out that in emergency situations it has been very helpful... But thankfully these haven't been many (except in some instances during the last years with relatives dropping like flies).

That would certainly justify your post count.

Apparently you failed to read Moose and Lancer's posts. I set the tone by making a civilized opening post which invited to civil discussion. The people responsible for destabilizing the thread were not exactly civil in their posts. They didn't exactly ask to be clarified - they claimed I was wrong and failed to even account for anything I said, instantly making assumptions and accusations. Yet I set a tone which doesn't invite to casual discussion? Riiight. I'd be surprised if you were doing anything but.

You refuse to partake in personal attacks, yet personally attacked me by stating I said something which I didn't and leaving it at that without any proof whatsoever. You refuse to partake in personal attacks, yet told me to grow up. Perhaps 'grow up' really wasn't an adequate response. 'Stop being a hypocrite' is likely better suited. EDIT: No. Post a link or a quote. Don't presume to have the moral high ground because you assume I meant something when I clearly didn't.

After the matter has been settled? You accused me of sounding immature by assuming others were homosexual just because they didn't agree with me. I asked you where did I say this in this thread. You didn't answer. Yet, "the matter has been settled". You accused me of bickering trough the pages of this thread instead of explaining myself when I have been doing almost nothing but explaining myself. My last post had me paraphrasing my posts so you would understand the same post under different words, to which you reply it's "a meaningless argument". Yet, "the matter has been settled". To quote your very own post: grow up.

So, where did I say this? This has been in page 1 from the beginning: Translation: it unfortunately seems that 'getting better' only shines trough in combat-related skills. Your whole point of discord was with the use of the world "only", not with the meaning of the sentence.

Is this the part where I should point out who started sounding immature because they disagreed with me by making posts which consisted of nothing more than a sleeping smily, or the assumption that I think too highly of myself simply because I don't agree with you? Ooops. I said it seems that pressing forward to get 'stronger' or 'better' only has an application in combat-related skills. This doesn't mean that only combat-related skills increase or are useful; rather, that only combat-related skills seem to be only ones which are ultimately more important. So do tell, what is the actual issue?

See, this is why I mentioned your own condescending attitude. It works terribly with your inability to post something without exagerating it. If you bother to read the contents of my posts, it's pretty clear that its wrong to state that all I'm doing is talking down on people who participate. Not only because that's not all I'm doing, but because I'm not acting that way towards all the people that participate. Examples. Just because I'm not accepting this particular criticism doesn't mean I can't or won't accept criticism ever. No, I'm "ruining it with crap like this" because of the crap others post. Look at the very quote you mention - it is addressed at your previous post, which has you coming out of the woodwork telling me I'm being condescendent. *That* is the "crap" that's actually ruining the thread. I'm sure I could just accept any and all things people may call me, but that's not how I'm wired. Yet, you gave enough of a flying rat's ass to come here and tell me I'm wrong by association of what others said instead of presenting your own reasoning for it, to call me condescending, and to make assumption after assumption regarding my posts and the intentions behind them - only to then claim to not care anymore and hint at a departure. If you look closely, you might see the irony of accusing me of trolling and baiting. But I doubt it. Thanks for your insight. I'm sure the lack of evidence to make this claim will make it a success among your peers.

Sorry but I'm already engaged. I have no reason to be or feel proud, really; at least not in regards to anything in this thread. I would have, if I could make people tell me why they feel the need to click with one specific part of a post but conveniently forget what came before.

Well, congratulations mkreku. I'll be sure to take a note of that for future reference. Now it only remains to be seen if you agree simply by association, or if instead you actually have an intelligible point to make regarding what was being discussed. If I'm being condescending then that would make us four, since you're not exactly a shinging example of humility. Three people. Wow. You make me cry, people. You really do.