213374U

[quote name='H

This. +INF/-INF notifications favor metagaming over roleplaying. At the very least allow the player to hide them. Other than that and the silly rage animation, it looks sweet. And the beards are better than FO3's!

****in' A. A shame that chunking couldn't be solved by Wish + Resurrection, though.

That's actually mentioned in the article. They even use the technical term: Diagonal reading is bad for you... you might need a hemispherectomy if you can't control it!

I know you're trying to cheer ol' Grumpy up, but I disagree. People are, for the most part, mediocre and boring. That doesn't mean one should live alone in a cave, though. Of course, your mileage may vary.

^ I wonder why. But yeah, it would be cool if they got around to getting the different class-based titles working. And enabled the BBCode for flash embedding too, while they are at it...

I thought you were older.

Sure, because it supports your POV. It's bad form to post a review of a book having read only a portion. It's disrespectful toward the author... and it shows contempt toward the reviewer's work and readers. I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the content of the review itself as I haven't read the book myself. But understand that I'm not going to take Pickrel's (or your own) word for it. One is deliberately incomplete (and conveniently, it's not the first time I see it used to attack her) and the other is, quite obviously, heavily biased. Further, you aren't being honest - you are using the alleged poor quality of Atlas Shrugged (as a novel!) as a means to attack Rand and, by extension, objectivism. Her worth as a novelist and her worth as a philosopher are separate things. Have you read "Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology"? Do enlighten us!

I think you are mistaking "good" for "lazy".

I don't go to pubs, so no worries there.

Hahaha, oh man. You really are a pop stalinist.

That would be the gist of it, yes.

Schizoid, rather.

Second link is dead, likely deleted.

Yeah, because growing up is such a great thing...

My bad. Did I say Ayn Rand? I meant Todd Howard: You know you want to.

Now, now. Don't be jealous. If you ask nicely enough, maybe HK would make one for you with that, um, thing! Or you could use the Ayn Rand one.

Oh, I get it now! So fans get to say what's canon and what isn't, based on their personal tastes.

Aw, snap!

Get off our thread, then, you partycrasher!

Shouldn't you take your own advice to heart? Shouldn't you post something other than useless fluff for a change? I made my argument, er, in the same post you quoted, and in the one before that.

So what? Is FO2 any less canon than the first? Is it any less of a setting-establishing resource? Arguments please, not the same old rehashed excuses.

Marry me, HK!

I'm sure you could give him a few pointers on how to run it. Um, sure. After all, it's not like stuff like the Keeng Rat and his bro are in the game IC, at all. Neither is that odd guy Horrigan, either. Or talking plants. Or huge, mutated, spectacle-wearing chessmaster scorpions. Or S&M-loving supermutants. Or scien... err, I mean, hubologists. No sir, thankfully, you can avoid all of that - it's easy as uninstalling the game! Sure, Bethy may be going overboard with a DLC revolving around the silliness present in the setting... but it's not really out of place, all things considered.