Jump to content

213374U

Members
  • Posts

    5642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by 213374U

  1. Did everyone just miss a Dr. Stranglove reference? Apparently so. Maybe one from Deuce Bigalow 2 would have had more success? I weep for teh Internets.
  2. But mainly communism.
  3. I don't know how much immigration you get up there in Denmark, but here in Spain we used to get a ****ing boatload (literally) of immigrants every week (now a bit less what with the government driving the country to the ground). And trust me, they aren't interested in fitting in at all. I know, I have had plenty of experience with them in the army. And those are the guys that are supposedly willing to fight for our country. I don't even want to know about the rest.
  4. Uh, right. The thinbloods, how forgettable. Actually, I think they were the most credible vamps in the game. They don't understand anything, are easy to empathize with - they are devastated that their former lives are destroyed, and are scared ****less by their new condition. And it also helps that they aren't certifiably bat**** like, um, 99% of the regular vampires (and many humans - remember that Dr. Fu-Manchu dude?) I would have liked to see these themes developed a bit more, not just the negative aspects of vampirism, but the thinbloods particularly. With Gehenna so close, thinbloods become one of the central issues of the setting. Oh well.
  5. He's not afraid to use proper punctuation! (only a little)
  6. As opposed to being written in books scattered around the game world?
  7. bonus e-points for those who get the reference.
  8. D3 will probably be a much better experience, gameplay-wise. But last I heard, the game was shipping without a LAN multiplayer option, so that's a big minus for me. TES, on the other hand: I, uh... I... I... first became aware of its effects during the physical act of love. Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. I can assure you it has not recurred. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, but I do deny them my essence. So I may end up getting neither.
  9. No, not Gary. The dude in the night club. Heh. And yet, he is one of the few characters in the game that reflects the fact that vampirism is, you know, a curse. That Nosferatu girl being the other, but only incidentally. Everyone else is partying around in their new soulless, blood-drinking, god-forsaken state just fine. I mean, who wouldn't want to be a monster?
  10. Because it is. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean, all of that is simply an example that our skill at managing our resources has increased, decreasing social conflict accordingly. Humans are still fundamentally the same. You contend that somehow, humans have advanced not only culturally, but behaviorally as well, as if culture could change what we are. But on the other hand, we have thousands of years of history to suggest that as long as people's bellies are full and they are amused, all will be relatively well, but when that ends, **** will hit the fan. Now go tell folks in Ciudad Ju
  11. ^ After finding out their stance on bear hugs.
  12. No, we're simply better off - people and the world are by and large the same; we have simply gotten better at logistics and management. We have set up modern societies in a way that people have no reason to get up in arms and demand the head of the king (literally), or the invasion of some neighbour country, depending on how skilled the person in charge is at handling the mobs. People presently have their basic needs covered, and then some. If that arrangement fails, people revert to their violent, selfish selves. Morals and enlightenment are great, but they won't fill your stomach or protect you from cold. It's curious, because you mention that yourself. Places that fail to meet the criteria for what is a "modern society" are notoriously backwards, and violence is rife. Er, why do you think that is? Because people there haven't had their eyes opened to the wonders of international legality, fundamental human rights and democracy? Or because, you know, there isn't enough food or power or land for everyone? After thousands of years the #1 problem is still the same: resources are limited. Human populations always expand beyond what their resources would allow, and trouble follows. So, where do you live that people have evolved beyond lying, cheating and murdering when they believe they can get away with it? I'd very much like to move there. Edit: I lol'ed
  13. Yeah. After ten thousand years of cultural evolution (read: constant warring), we have finally learned... PR!!! Don't be too impressed with modernity, though. People are still people.
  14. Is that a trick question?
  15. is you making an effort to be an ass everytime you posts? we are guessing you is. Aw, jeez. For you and Google-impaired vol: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gay+purchasing+power edit: this gromnirspeak thing is tricky!
  16. And despite all the replies in the thread, only one seems to support the Palestinian side. ...welcome to the Obsidz boards...
  17. What numbers have to add up? Alanschu said the characters were bisexual so the cost of including a gay romance can't have been that much, appealing to more people without a significant extra effort. It's not purchasing 10 copies, either, but DA on top of other stuff. But apparently BIO decided to cut the gay romance from ME2, so then again, maybe not.
  18. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/11/26...ted-Guests.html Nice job, agent Horrigan. *salutes*
  19. I remember reading that the gay segment of the population has an insane purchasing power. The lack of a gay romance may or may not be a turnoff for (gay) customers, but it looks like Bio chose not to risk it. A sensible decision if the popularity of regular romances is anything to go by. Ethics? Equality? Artistic statements? More like market forces...
  20. And that's exactly what I meant - it's impossible to reasonably extrapolate that to a global scale, because we lack an understanding of cloud dynamics. And, as you no doubt know, water vapour accounts for ~95% of the greenhouse effect. Good! Then what is the validity of these models? It's not just that chaos governs how the climate works, it's that we don't know all the variables there are and in some cases (such as could and solar dynamics), we just don't understand them. So instead, placeholder "parameters" are introduced in the model. But on the other hand, we are *obviously* to assume that this temperature increase trend will continue for the foreseeable future, and any number of other effects and problems are theoretically derived from that. Pretty much because we choose to believe so. Again, I have to disagree that "but it's chaos" is good enough an excuse to pass shoddy science as sound evidence for policy-making. Substitute "Chaos" with "God", for effect. I couldn't say it better myself.
  21. The "basic science" has been proven? What, you mean at the Laws of Thermodynamics level, right? Because other than that, all we have are incomplete theories and computer models that require constant fine-tuning to match observed data. Normally, you are supposed to get your model working before you call it a "theory", and certainly before said theory starts being a basis for policy. Simply because from an epistemological standpoint science can't prove things in the sense a theorem does, it is no excuse to start lowering the rigour standards for science. What ARE the consequences, at any rate? And how have those been extrapolated? Understanding why the ice caps are melting is essential to make adequate contingency plans and evaluating the worth and feasibility of permanent solutions. Without any kind of reliable predictions, what, exactly, are we to prepare against? Or do we just assume a worst case scenario, and start evacuating all coastal cities? Because, you know, this costs money.
  22. Because discussing consequences without understanding causes is pointless.
  23. Those progressions are from 1970 to present day. The Arctic ice cap is what, 1M years old? The mechanisms behind the observed shrinkage are NOT understood, so attempts at making accurate predictions are futile. So, again, it's good to know about relative and absolute extremum before drawing conclusions. If you mean "the ice seems to have receded since we have satellites", nobody's going to contest that. But you went on to claim that it's undisputable proof that "global warming" is a reality. Anyway, I look forward to my summer resort in Antarctica being finished.
  24. No, the only classes that require a story feat are Neverwinter Nine and Shadow Thief. You sure you meet all the requirements? Your BaB isn't the same as your AB. http://nwn2.wikia.com/wiki/Arcane_Archer
×
×
  • Create New...