thelee

i'm still a little confused as to how this would work. ok, so the entire spell wouldn't repeat. but would the entire AoE effect repeat? So if you have 5 enemies being hit, and one of them triggers vithrak/marux amanth, only the one gets hit again? or all 5 enemies get hit again by another aoe pulse?

hang on - maybe this was an obvious interaction, but does that mean that with vithrack slippers or marux amanth, each pulse on each target of a symbol grants a 5% or 10% or even both combined for 14.5% chance of repeating the symbol???

unless you want to do this just for fun, i don't think this is necessary. this isn't vanilla or the crit path, this is a very specific mod that enables a specific outcome, and player should be expected to have a reasonable understanding that certain things just won't work or be effective (like eder getting an extra pet... but no eder).

aw, full resolution image won't load. no idea what those things on the bottom-right of the image are (some water delemgan maybe? lol) but pretty impressed with the rest of it. I wonder how good image AI will be in a decade O_O

<meme>oh you sweet summer child</meme> i haven't racked up the hours that @Boeroer has, but I think I'm up ~1750 steam hours. i play other games (Cities: Skylines probably second most often, and now Multiversus) but Deadfire scratches an itch that no other game can, not even the P:K/WotR games.

sorry, do you mean swords? sabres should be +2 PEN with +50% recovery penalty i'm not wild about ranged weapons for damage-based ciphers, with the exception that there are a few blunderbusses that are really good for ciphers. you've already used kitchen stove, but after thunderous report, have you tried switching to one of the mortar-style ones (from serafen)? the aoe can help you generate a lot of focus from those, much better than the puny 4x bullets from normal blunderbuss shots.

so, every time you hit with saru-sichr and the dot stack refreshes, *each* stack triggers a melee weapon effect??

iirc reke mostly gets random barks. enough for a bit of an arc in vanilla, but not a *ton*. i think he probably gets the least content overall.

"cursor?" this thread is now an S4 strategy/tips discussion. i found what helped was being a lot more aggressive with anti-poison than i normally am. (antidotes and my main druid i specced out purge of toxins, which i normally avoid) on TB mode in particular, I bought and used a couple summon items to soak up hits (and action economy) and brought a long a cipher who could fast cast puppet master at the opening of the fight. all else fails buy some scrolls of greater maelstrom to wipe out the totems asap, and a few naga as well edit: i guess whether or not this is a "fair" difficulty for S4 is an interesting question. definitely would be more prepared in base game, but in s4 you have a lot more tools you can straight up buy or train on the spot.

yeah i wouldn't consider it a lot of content for sidekicks, but it is definitely a welcome change from the non-DLC game where they were silent

it used to be a lot worse in earlier patches. the shock damage one could wipe entire parties out. the big problem is that you don't get anything out of wild mind (aside from the cheese constentin just discovered). all the wild-mage-style classes i can think of it in my experience have other benefits, and the variability is considered the drawback, not the defining feature. and the effect is a symmetry that's very hard to break to your advantage (again, aside from the cheese just discovered). even with the shock damage nerf, as an example i think "target becomes invisible" effect can be extremely bad for a fight, especially if it triggers on an aoe. that means casters you can't interrupt, free sneak attack or other attacks from enemies, it could foul up spells/effects you have cast that are already in motion. even if it happens to you, an unexpected invisibility can be bad, since this invisibility also means untargetability. i've literally gotten a KO because the invisibility hit an ally and it made a support spell whiff (i forget if it was a heal or a suppress affliction, but it was a DoT that i missed the window to counteract)

inversions are really ugly. if you're curious, you can read about them here: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/227477-pillars-of-eternity-ii-deadfire/faqs/76599/inversions i suggest two rules of thumbs. first. "is this thing affected by inversions?" if you stacked a bunch of small modifiers together, could it result in a complete negation of something? (e.g. -100% hostile duration, or -100% area of effect, or -100% healing, or -100% action speed) then yes, it's affected by inversions. this is basically why inversions exist, so that you can have an additive system without worrying about accidentally creating enough negative modifiers that you have 0 or less than 0 effects unless you deliberately want to completely negate something, e.g. Enfeebled affliction. second. "how do these things stack?" the 'easy' answer is that they are not quite as strong as multiplicative effects, but are nonetheless roughly similar in impact. so a -75% PEN penalty functions like a multiplier of .25x. Two -10% hostile duration modifiers functions like a .9x modifier and a .9x modifier multiplied together. Remember, it's not exactly like this, when it comes to combining multiple negative modifiers it's much more moderate, but it should give you a rough ballpark on how strong or weak modifiers are when combined together.

super heavy armor + dazed (-4 PEN) can really help with survivability. add in hard/robust from another source for an additional +2 AR (not from barb, because you probably want to save those resources on HoF), or drinking/crafting potions of spirit armor for +3 AR. in the best case, having enough difference between your AR and enemy PEN means enemies get their damage quartered (it's almost as strong as multiplicative effect, so even enemies with tons of damage bonuses will do piddling damage). even if it doesn't always help with crits (crits getting 1.5x PEN is really hard to bring down), it at least means that the normal hits aren't hurting you for that much anymore. w/ konstanten iirc i ended up wearing magnera's chain (which is A+ armor due to it being only medium and covering its weaknesses really well) and dazed was good enough for most fights. i would occasionally drink a potion of spirit armor if there were *lots* of baddies. the funny thing is, the damage output becomes so huge at higher levels that survivability becomes less of a problem because you're just able to run through enemies a lot faster. in terms of outside assistance, a lone priest--mc or sc--could probably help a lot - just cast barring death's door if you're getting hit with way too much burst damage, and hopefully your barbarian has cleared some breathing room before it runs out. a pet that restores health to party on kill (or self, if this is your mainchar) can help with sustain a lot. (edit: also said priest could drop triumph of the crusaders on the barbarian and in any fight with more than like two bad guys your barbarian is basically immortal from the massive health gain)

no you got it, thanks

i think i'm going to have to update my guide with an entire dedicated section for all the avenging storm interactions and cheese opportunities that have been discovered over the past few months

is there any issue with me swapping out my existing S4 mod with the modified recipes (hidden or not) if i already have a game going on?

you jerk, i just rolled a single-class lifegiver to take advantage of a lot of the new interactions you discovered, and now you found another one for me to keep track of!

to op: i had a SC barbarian build that was HoF + retaliation + axes. I did have dazing shout, but I only used it for survival and engagement, not to spam. i still had retaliation, and i think you're going to need that because HoF is just so expensive so you won't have it too much. but even w/out spamming shouts, this can be extremely effective - konstentin (whom i built this way) went from weak-sauce in party damage, to #1 damage dealer. and konstentin isn't particularly optimized for this setup (i would put way more intellect and might). retaliation is good here, even if you're not deliberately optimizing it, because with blood thirst you will randomly get free instant attacks with your axes from killing enemies with retaliation. this means more bleeding stacks, which means higher likelihood of more blood thirst triggers, etc. it can really spiral out of control. it's a massive payoff for single-classing and just one ability point. and yeah while HoF is expensive, it does work well enough with axes. it lets you spread bleeding debuff very quickly, and getting extra bleeding stacks gets you to the "Break-even" point I mentioned in my previous post much faster. edit: also used the blood frenzy one in this setup, not the spirit one. staggered/terror from the spirit frenzy are anti-synergies/redundant with this setup, whereas extra bleeding stacks is A+

nit: i would adjust this and say that you *shouldn't* turn it on all the time until you get the higher level stuff. kinda depends on your party, but i remember some quick math I did where there's a point where the extra damage from the battle axe modal finally makes up for the massive recovery penalty, and i was surprised to find that even in potd upscaled, i was not actually hitting that point very often with everything else going on, unless it was a boss or a particularly beefy enemy. all bets are off once you get blood thirst though, you can really start snowballing. edit: the calculus is probably different if you multiclass with another martial that has a better full attack option than barbaric blow

Pictured: Constentin in their Deadfire game, discovering new cheesy interactions never before seen to exploit Avenging Storm

yeah, same same. but did you know you could just swap characters in/out at an inn? you don't have to be on the overland map. it means you can't do it whenever, but it's "safe."

what happens if you use the out-painting on some deadfire portraits, or the pirate-ship deadfire hero image? man that outpainting is insane

most places like to keep these numbers close to their chest, unless it's something super huge to brag about. i think our best chance is another steam data leak and then extrapolation based on that

[screenshots of avowed, an open world RPG that combines Fallout: New Vegas and Skyrim] Do any very specific pillars of eternity terms work? [Eothas sunbathing on a beach with Berath] [Screenshots of Josh Sawyer's latest independent game, a pixel art Bike Shop RPG simulator]

Vatnir is a sidekick so doesn't have a ton of reactivity, but I would put Vatnir as dark-side territory. If you select the right reactivity/background, Aloth already has a bit of a darker streak, and you can reinforce this in the game. After that it's kind of a stretch. I guess you could say Mirke is dark in that as a drunken sidekick, she'll go along with whatever genocidal plans you have in mind without complaining. those all sound good flavor picks. i think assassin could also be worth considering. there's also an angle where you can take on the more sinister aspects of berath (offensive-oriented priest of berath) or nature (druid, pick up all the decay spells). also for consideration are multiclasses with names that can lend themselves to a darker side, like zealot for woedica/berath (rogue + priest), or a bleak cannibalistic fanatic (bleak walker/corpse eater). i would actually be surprised if you could actually lock yourself out of the game. josh sawyer pointedly tries to enable the "mass psychopath" style of play. i was on reddit where i saw an insightful comment that observed that all the factions have two possible leaders, and they are on different maps, so it's impossible for the player to ambush a faction without warning and leave it completely headless (and possibly break an end-game encounter). so the game is designed to be resilient against mass murder. i would actually be very curious to know what would happen if you tried to kill everyone in port maje (i know you can kill all the huana without any problem, don't ask me why i tried that; but i didn't try killing the vailians).