Hurlshort

Yeah, I was pretty disappointed to hear that. It definitely gives a black eye to San Jose that people would boo Canada's anthem.

GAH! I'm going to throw up.

The calls are pretty tight in this game so far. That's good, as that was the standard that was set in the beginning of the season.

Nope. 45 minutes until game time.

I think the market is currently big enough, and diverse enough, to support all three consoles. Internationally, I think the PS3 will probably sell more units. But in the US, I see the 360 staying competitive. The Wii really markets to a different demographic. So my answer is all three will continue to grow.

I'm re-quoting myself because Hades and Darque didn't really address my questions at all, they just tried to poke fun. I know what the acronym RTS stands for, but it's very general. Currently, the majority of games labeled RTS are clones of Command and Conquer (technically Dune) and Warcraft. This is not that type of RTS. So should it be given another genre? Does Myth and Total War deserve another genre?

Actually, for a moment I thought the fans were booing, but I think they were cheering the singer on. If there was booing, it was drowned out by the applause.

Yeah, the missed calls are on both sides of the ice. Still, it changes the game.

Look, I'm not trying to take anything away from the Oilers, but the ref's are useless at this point. They aren't even making the easy calls. Guys are getting hooked and slashed all over the ice and there has been nothing. I'm soooooo pissed right now. I'm also not too happy at the fact the Sharks aren't rolling with it. They had the lead and need to start clicking again.

Why does everyone keep calling this an RTS? This isn't anything like a standard RTS. Was Myth an RTS? Is the combat aspect of Total War games an RTS? It really needs a different acronym.

This isn't really an argument. Consoles will always be cheaper in terms of gaming bang. But PC's are so much more. It's silly to debate (even though we've had the same debate ad nauseum here.)

Ok, I just watched a rather long preview that I downloaded off my 360. I died a little inside. It was like Unreal Tournament with magic. It looked great, but any resemblance to the Shadowrun PnP game dies at the concept of American Indians versus Techies. I wanted to reach in and strangle the design team for raping one of my favorite licenses.

But this isn't an RTS, it's supposed to be more like Myth or Total War. That means there shouldn't be any building. You should be focusing more on unit positions, formations, and morale. Mus already stated this.

So...are we just making glib comments, or is anyone going to play the game?

I'm not sure what this really means for the series. I actually expected the Oil to take game 3, since a 6 game winning streak is usually where the Sharks drop one. But I didn't expect a triple OT game. Who is this worse for? Edmonton dominated for long stretches, which is great for their confidence, but it took way too long to put the game away. San Jose withstood a ton of pressure, and Toskala proved his mettle, but they lost. They also expended a lot of energy for a losing effort. Would it have been better to lose in regulation? Game 4 is the real test.

This is a late frickin' game. I have no clue how I'm going to get up tomorrow.

Doh, I was thinking of Too Human. My bad.

After watching some gameplay for Mass Effect, I'm convinced this is the God of War game for the 360. That's cool with me, although I'm not expecting much on the RPG front.

I'm pretty happy with the direction Warcraft lore has taken. They've made many changes to fit a MMO setting, but it's still pretty cool how you can explore areas straight out of the RTS games. It's not classical literature, but I don't expect that when the game started in some geek's basement.

My apologies, you had posted in the other Shadowrun thread so I assumed you had read the original post. The press release said "a first-person shooter based on an old paper RPG of the same name from a couple decades ago."

Man, you guys expect WAY too much from your action movies. Resident Evil and Underworld made money because they were fun action flicks. They weren't overly complicated or required studying of source material.

Seriously, we've known it was a FPS game for months. Get over it.

Is this a CGI film? Blizzard has the CGI talent to pull off a pretty visually stunning movie. I'm not a doomsayer, there are a few movies I've really enjoyed that were based on games. Final Fantasy is actually one of my favorites in terms of artistic direction, and I think Blizzard can easily equal that. Oh yeah, I liked Resident Evil, but that's because I didn't expect them to be true to the games. It's a frickin' action movie. Edit: Just found the press release...live action...they better get good make-up artists.

It sounds like a squad based shooter. That's interesting at least.

Wow, Tears...that's revolutionary. Seriously, I'm looking forward to this based solely on the ability to tell a good story,