Rosbjerg

No, she is mentioned.. the name just changes depending on the version. Liyliyth in the Hebrew, and something as obscure as Night Bird in the standard english one.. but it's still Lilith, a demon and formerly Adams first wife.

Borderland looks amazing, I'm especially intrigued about the 4 player coop feature.. I wonder how that'll be.. Bible reference more likely..

I know... The most evil part, is that it's included in my rent.. which is pretty low too! muhahaha

No, someone posted a list of postcounts from the BIS boards about a year ago .. I remember that too, I thought this was a revival of that thread initially. It's probably been archived I can't find it either..

I'm not so sure about that. You can't really compare a desperate uprising, by starved and undernourished people, to a possible continental wide insurgency, by ex-soldiers/workers etc, with access to military weapons, who hasn't been living in diseased and horrible conditions..

I'm sharing this with ~ 60 people.. I think it's about a 100/100 line.

They entered the war in late 41, 2 years after it started and ended it 4 years later.. so technically it wasn't really near the end. In 41 things seemed to be going quite well for Germany, they were making good progress in Russia and they had control of almost all of mainland Europe, the only democracy which wasn't overrun at this time, on the mainland, was Sweden. Of course we know now that the war is about to turn once the winter hits and by 42, when America starts sending mass supplies and troops to England and Russia halts the advance, the war really turns sour for Nazi Germany. But to answer your question - I think America would've thought long and hard on it's position if Germany had fared well against England and Japan had control of China.. Because it's hard to deploy troops to a theatre of war, across an ocean, into the enemy's backyard. I don't think America could've done much except try to nuke Germany if they had total control of Europe. But they would've probably waited in response to see if Russia could withstand I think.

He still would've mass murdered millions of Jews.. I wouldn't exactly call him nice or brilliant, even if he had "only" conquered one country. Remember everyone.. That the point of this thread is not to discuss whether Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Hirohito, Truman or Churchill were evil/brilliant or not.. but rather if Germany could've won the war.

Some very important, and imho impossible victories, for Germany could've won them the war, at least in the short run.. Dissent and guerilla activities would've eventually broken their control of Europe I think. One thing that would've made a huge difference to the war in Europe, could've have started as far away as China.. if Mao hadn't allied himself with China to defeat Imperial Japan, then Japan would probably have taken control of China, which would've meant America had to divert many resources to defeat Japan.. Giving Germany time to fight Russia without worrying so much about 2 fronts. The biggest difference though would have been if Hitler had gone through the middle-east and attacked Russia from 2 sides (see picture), via Turkey, and taking out the Russian oil wells. If that had been successful, Germany could've cut off most of Russia's retreating troops and supplies. Possibly turning the war to Germany's favour, at least until America gained a foothold. To avoid a lengthy war with America later, Germany would have to conquer England and thereby deny America a proper footing in Europe.

Doh.. stupid thing to overlook - painful death too, being sucked inside-out through your fingers.

I love those moments.. Random Coop fun! unfortunately they are rare, but the games become that much more fun when they happen.

Darkstar One right? It's an ok game, I thought the story was a little stiff.

Yeah you need to iron while the metal is hot my friend.. destroy this dog's social ife in ways he never imagined. It's time for an all-out assault on his postion.

It's an easy argument, problem is there isn't a service availabe which offers roughly the same game (a SW MMO) and doesn't have a monthly fee.. So I think it's a fairly valid point to be upset about pricing, since you have to skip the product entirely to avoid it, which is a shame. But that's the package deal as it stands today of course, I'm sure that Bioware and any other company would change it however, if enough people were unsatisfied.. So there's always merit in complaining imo .

I saw Synedoche, New York - written and directed by Charlie Kaufmann.. I think it's his wierdest film to date, but it also draws inspiration from all his previous ones - you can clearly see the allusions to Being John Malkovich, Adaptation, Human Nature etc.. While also being David Lynch'ish in the messy chronology and story. HD trailer, . Amazing imo, but it's gonna need some digestion before I can really tell wether it was that good or not.

Age of Conan has some very beautiful scenery imo.. Here I'm looking at the Palace in Aquilonia (I think)..

Kinda like a pie.. but disgusting.. also, how could he be a saint? saints don't murder.. oh right..

I've decided to give AoC another go, to see if the patches etc have improved the game.. it seems alot more balanced now at least, as I'm not being owned at every corner by priets 5 levels lower than me.. And the peple are alot less dickish, I contribute that to massive walk-out of players though.. The ones that are at least RP why they kill me (most of the time).. All in all a better experience actually. Anyone here play on EU servers? Right now I'm just lonewolfing, which gets kinda boring..

yeah, you got me. let's have it then. your point for correcting me would have been what, exactly? Okay I was just being an asshat.. It was two seperate points, I did think you were serious at first, so my second post was just to prove how hard it is to tell wether people are joking or being serious and how easy it is to say that you were only joking when people call you on it.. Not the best way to do it though..

errrr, no. and made a joke. which you took seriously. congrats. And missed the point completly again..

I would very much like to see that as well.. It would undoubtly improve the laws they make!

And missed the point completly.. I think this is really their approach to any game and setting, it seems to me that they are much more interested in what's fun and cool and not so much if it all fits together. Now alot of bad can be said about that, but there are some companies that forget their games need to be playable and not just have a coherent and good idea. Both approaches are bad, but the former at least works.

That's not a very nice thing to say... As others have said we thought you might be a bot, due to the rather random question given the site, but I'm glad you're not.. feel free to provide the link again if you want. I promise not to delete it this time. Hope you enjoy Italy as well..

It was kinda cruel to ask DN to turn on the radio and then just bail, leaving him to fend off the zombies on his own.. but hey, survival takes precedence!

Well I could help you control it, but I don't think you'd want that.. so try to tone it down on your own..