ArchBeast

I don't knhow berwulf had good music and wasn't the best movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQdxPxJW68M music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUv-cF_Oscw < best par of the movie :D

i'm only hope that they WON"T hire JUSTIN biebier :D Everyelse Justin whould be great :D

By the way what are you thinking about a metal/rock song when you fight a boss ? I found a somethig ... that when i fight dragons in skyrim i feel so epic hahaha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDE2VQzghp4 another https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyCFuP3rM2w image THIS music then fighting dragon waaaaaaah!!!!!

now we must made to 4 million mayby they will add Half-dragons

FF7 music reactor ... ahhh ... i wish they make a remake of this wonderfull game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_H9dd8JwTc

You forgot "Orlans" Could be then Gnomes. Now we have the full DnD set. And Godlike race :P

Papylon I don't said that BG music was awfull i can't simply remember it. Arcanum music was awfull. I forgot to mention FF7 music and FF8 music the best music there is :D In FF7 even FACTORY music was fantastic.

You forgot "Orlans"

even this will do :D hahaha

Yeah. They defended them sellfs by using knights an monlike-knight called crusaders If you whant to try what is harder steel or your fist, DO IT and tell us how it work :D

The best game music i remember is. Spellforce, Witcher, Vampire Masquarade Bloodlines, NWN1, Dragon Age, Mass Efect. Heroes 3, Gothic 2 Night of the Raven, Skyrim, Sorry i like BG, Arcanum but i must say that music was theirs most dawnfall. Acanum misic was so afful that i played it with Silencend soud.

You know that there are more games than BG ?

I don't like the idea of D&D monks. They always seem to me like cross between songoku and superman. HAW can you crush an steel plate armor with your fist ? Even with a steel mace you will have problems. Secodry monk in europe don't fight so the ony one that may be consider as (father ideas) are east monks, like szaolin monk etc. IF anyone of you seen 1 document about them you will know that they also used spears, a some light swords (chinas sword - something like japanese katana)they used fists and hand to hand figt becouse most od easter wariors used ligh armor or non and hand to hand was usefull when you don't have weapon.

I hope it's a cross-breed between qunari and orc(or ogre) ang they can hold two-handed blades in one hand... I invite you tu my topic..

Information from this forum, from Live Q&A Something like Qunari ? :D I only hope they at least are simmillar to half-orcs :can hold two--handed weapons in 1 hand and some kind of bushido/ qunari like moral code :D

Haha.. When i first encoter Minsk i thougt that he is half-orc. Even his "Space-hamster" were perfect for this race. You see someone looking as a monster and then hi jump with "Space-Hamster" wrrrrrrrrrr.... not my hamster... not my hamster ...wrrrrr hehe

Sometimes IS here examples : 1. You encouner a powerfull killer-vampire when you have 1 or 3 lvl, and hi want tu suck you dry, the only posibility for not seeing "Game Over" mayby not fight but avoiding it, and when you have 30 lvl come back and deal with him. 2. Killing someone (lets say gang lord) may bring not only revange on you but revange from this gang on innocent people. Somtimes consequenses of "killing" someone can make more damage than atual. 3. I suggest you tu play Witcher, there are planty of decisions where you not chose God or evil. Some times you must accept lesser evil then faceing bigger one. 4. If you even encounter a Big Evil an there are no consequenses (at last nobydy will hunt you for that) you may not obtain important information if you don't make a deal with him. 5. If you have no intrest in making world better (you plaing as someone EVIL) this will not consern you if he lives or not. 6. "Pure evil" is a little bit rare consept becouse the most of characters in game thinks that they are doing something good, you may convince them that they wrong, and they can change or even provide something for your "mercy"

And what about other opions than Sneak/kill/persuade ? I think that poioning food, make some king of ritual (even sacrefice), learn new spell lets say "lifing wood" and let threes eate this ogres or other. Even making a hudge BOMB and giving to ogre telling him this is a watermelon, even making a special silver-sword for fighting werewolf boss sound good. In Vampire Masquarede Bloodlines you don't get EXP for killing, you gain exp by makeing progress in quests or obraining important informations like "Your companion steals from you" or "Trolls are weeker when they encounter sunligh, vampires get killd by it" But most of all (the best example off gaining exp) is when you encounter 2 or more hostile to ech other groups. In Exp=kill games you will gain max exp only if you micro fight to situation where you or your team kills each member of every group. exampe : Bandits, trolls, your team. Bandits whant to kill you and rob you, they defending aginst trolls, trolls whant to eat bandit kebab and salad maked of your team, you and you team want to survive. MAX exp you will gain only if every bandit gets killd by your team and trolls only by your team .. why ? It's stupid and frustrating. Even if bandits are not hostalie for you ( you persuade them ) and 2 grup are fighting 1 you can't fully let bandits hepl you team becouse if ewen 1 bandit kill 1 troll you lose exp. bisades takling and fight about what is more dificult fighing or speaking is foolish becouse WE don't now the rules of it in P:E mayby sneaking is simple mayby even sneaking behind drunk troll is hard, mayby figing a dragon is easy mayby it's life fight.

Whould be great if another playable race is orks (or something like) but it if other like barberian-savage-large-brutal-warior like race whould be ok. I personaly thing that it's the time for some half-orc like race from neverwinter. BUT only if it will by done well no only in terms "They like fighting and they smell bad". And another thing "ORLAN" race ? When i think "Orlan" it remainds me barceep from gothic 2 or farmer from original campain NWN2. Worst name ever, even Bu-bu or Ciubi-ciubi whould be better. Even Japanasing this name to Oranato sound better. And I"M SURE that even if evrywon on this site will think the same Obsydian will never say "Ok, ok sorry we made a mistake, we are already working on fixing this problem" becouse they don't whan't to admit mistakes. Mt only hope is that that "Orlan" name whould by the last foolishness they produce, even dinosaur romance companion whould be better... esh

Peasants ar not your conserns, if you wanna by good boy (and end terrorising peasants) then you can fight them, poison their food, plant a fire at their camp, or intimidate them (if you are powerfull) that if they do this again you will kill and torture them like they do to peasants. You can also sneak to their camp thake quest item and gooldm you can join ogres and with them atack willige. EXP must be the same not becouse they are the same dificulty but if lets say option A (killing ogres) whould grant the most of exp and other options less, almoust everywon will kill ogres regardles of other options or even whould not search for another options. If you had a stronghold (castle) you might even offer those ogres a Job of your soldiers and nex try to influence them to be better or not. You can also not gain (in this exapmle) exp by by taking an options but ending the quest, mayby killing ogres isin't the best way becouse these ogres may have famillys(friends comanions or even their clan) that whould take revange on por peasants. Or even not take any exp for this quest but only gold, or gifts. But most inportantly killing ogres isn't the best expamle (dragons to) let's say that bandits capture a willige girl and now they want money from peasants for her. Killing and exping on kills isin't the best way becouse they kill this girl if you even move, you can atact them but in this wersion girl alvays dies, and gaining even 1 exp for that mision whould be a mistake .... next, wondering thour the woods you should gain exp not for running and killing animals ( they are no enemis to the peaople, this is their home etc) they will atack you becouse they are affraid of you or are hungry, you kill only becouse you like or for money. In this exaple you should gain exp not for killing poor deer's but for uncovering map of this forest, finding secet roads, tresures etc. off coure im not couting posibility for playing a hunter but i think that hunters in fantasy world whoud not get paid for killing wolfes (like in our world) but killing more dangerus monsters like wywerns or trolls.

that depends on terms when critical may occur yhe system on exp gaining, lets say tat only after 15 hits you will have chance gain critical, and if you fight with this enemy before you will gain only 1/2 of exp from criticals. In this terms when you encounter a RAT an kill him only mayby at first battle you will gain +2 exp (if critical occurs), 2 rat, 3 rat, 1000000 rat will propably give you nothing. When you encounter dragon you have chance (long battle) for even 40 - 100 criticals so this meand 80 to 200 exp (if we count 1 critical as +2 exp), but when you encouter a secound dragon you will have for killikng him 40-100 exp, another 20-50 another 10-25 and after that even afret killing 10 dragons you will get nothing only exp from Quest. In spellforce we have this type of exp gaining 1 goblin gives you lot of exp but secound gives you less exp than first and 100 gives you only small numer of exp point.

I think that exp should be gain only by completing quests, subquests or making large stepps to completing them, or doing some extras like finding a new way to use their abilitis let's say you find a way for new healing potion, or new armor. This type of exp gaining were se in Vampire Masquarade - Bloodlines I think that guy that kills 1000000000000000 rats, is less experienced then a guy that saved someons life, or done something great. I think that multikilling way to gain experience is overused and boooooooring. Let's imagine a situation, we have a Super-Hero an he is asked "Were did you gain you power ?" and hi is saying "I killd 100000000 wolfs by running in the woods" that's dump. they should also gain exp by useing their abilitis lets say 2 exp for making a critical hit or not getting distracted by blow or hit casting spell. And all party members (eventualiy even same from the base camp) should gain experience for that becouse teir participating in thous events. Of cours if obsidian will do standard boring and dump exp-gaining like "Kill rat gain 25 points" i will still buy this game but it will by big fall ....

ok. 3 day of poll and we have most answers on "Yes - fully playable race with good background. Something like green qunari. "from Dragon Age" or orcs from Warcraft 3." and second "NO !!" So conclusion is simple peaople whant is dane well or omited like Tale sad. But i don't know why only few of "No man" respond "Why no ?". I whan't to know why some people don't wan't them or any barberian-like race. So if you are on "NO !!" then at least say why. Thanks everywon for participading in poll and for thouse who respond.

I personaly whouldn't mind a undead (lets say lich) as a primary oponent in eternity, i mean undead that thinks that he is doing something good but his wrong. Lets say a lich soul-eater that think when he take enough power, he will rebulid the world, ending pain, brother-fights, wars, hate and make a perfect world etc. but first he must kill everywon, put there souls in new bodies a make happy new world, better then even gods desinged it ... thats only a example... I dont think that lowful goood undead could conwince me, byt some undead that THINKS that is another messaiah and in a long term he is doin more good then evel or even nececery ever.... is noth bad. Let's say Garrius from NWN 2 w Ammon Jerro mindset ...

i can't edit the poll enyway so ... :D