ArchBeast

Then get some ofm that guys that rape you yesterday in the butt hahahah you ****ing troll stih hahahahahahhahahaha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iypYiZbtebc You are so stupid that you cant even say anything, you can only troll me by "Quete" me and ptrinting some video to this ... If you can't say anything that suck my **** child and **** off .. (you understand or you need special translator for this you stpid **** ?)

AGX-17 I think you and your homies (talking about me) shoud not quesion my person, my sexuality and my opinion of women, i like women, i pick-up them and realiy (good or bad not matter) in my opinion sex is normal human interaction, and i respect if you think that this game is not about human interactions but exping or spells OK. You shoud more answer about thret then on me, some of you guys in my opinion offended me wery well, and nobudy tells (hey you cross line there) you all are OK (you think that women is ofendet when they hear they are pretty, bull ****) i thing that moderator shoud give some warnings about personal atacts on my person. I have some isues about this threat ... The problem is that that normal, inteligent people can talk at all subjects, you just shown that most of you are not only narrowminded but also wery hostle kids that any discusiion is worthless ... Sory guys but only few (not many) of you can say something with not kid stuff, narrowminded **** I'am man that lives his own live (not only Games) and to me not having sex (or at least some thing that sudgest that sex has ever been) is the same that for someone not talking npc.... Some of you may thing that i whant porn game but the most importan part of (role plaing game) is ROLE when you see character that is sexless its sintetic .... In game og thrones we have many sexy women, many sexual and somethimes even almost porn content and i don't remember any person that was offendet by it.. in my opinion you what a simple kid game, i play BG when i was 12 years old now im 22, i'm adult and i what to be threatet like adult, i don't kids stuff .... If you are on develop level of 12 old boy thet ok no mature content, but you must admit that isint the thret on "only porn" game ... sex is importat thing in HUMAN liffe, if you whant not realistic than ok but i simply don't care ... I think that talking to you guys like you in this forum is pointless, and sory, i don't whant anywon to be ofendet, but you and i are living in difrent worlds, when i say SEX you see porn, when i see sex i see women, i think that most of you are shy, virgins tha are affraid of sex content .... Im not offendet when i see pusssy or breast, this is normal thing ... you se porn in this .... I think that sex is not only oral/anal thing but also emotional, and if you think that emotions, morality and sexuality is not needet then WHY the hell 2 genders ? Thy women and man ? Let's do only (something between) sexless persons that don't breed.... don't have kids etc. YOU or are more consern to making quests or (exp gaining) that on normal human interactions .... kids .... Some of you kids suggest me to play skyrim (for adult content), nut i think that skyrim is more for you endless quests, non sexual constent not storyline relaited relationsghips .... and this is the and on this topic ... all of you gain andless wolf-killing quests and more kidminded quests.. i will take some girls in reality ... Becouse if they will implant some ralationship like in diablo 1 **** i will not play this 4 miloin trash copy of BG...

It's kind of funny, actually. There's such a stigma attached to romances that people always have to add this disclaimer and justify themselves And just like many people who feel the need to put these kind of disclaimers, your justifications completely contradict your claim. You're asking for completely gratuitous and prominently featured tililation, which is kind of a defining feature of porn and dating sims. You could at least try to admit it. By the way, I voted no at everything, because of how profoundly biased your poll is. If coure i whoud like to see nudity in game but in in a subtle way. Not mass efect alien awkward like : And about Isometrics, this is posible in portraits and if the characters have more details but if not then simple "blackscreen" will do. It just depends.

Women shoud look sexy but no nudity. 3 option and 3 question. What about nude but not sexy? What about decently dressed with a realistic figure? Sory I did not take into account this option, btw women in realistic are sexy.

Women shoud look sexy but no nudity. 3 option and 3 question.

Thanks

3 time i sad i don't whant porn simulator what part of this you don't understand ? I played skyrim with "more" sexual mods but i don't remember that there is "SEX-Simulator" mod haha .. as i sad i don't whant porn in game. BTW2. Im not game developer, this is only discuss not planing to putt this in game if this not fitts (like full sex-scenes) i only want to know your opinion and please Logical Reading. Is i sad that i don't want something then stop saying that i want. I don't know why you all are so hostile, if you don't like it at least not atack my personaly. You don't know enything about me so stop guessing what I want and what I do not.

God piont but what about "Black screen and voices in whe background" ? By the way how to change this poll for question 2 and 3 not be mandatory. ?

Sorry i did not know that, i you whant say no say "Other" i can't edit this poll right now... sorry guys .. Sory for my english im still learning, if enywan is still ofendet then im sorry,

I sad MAYBY, To me it isn't soft porn, to you it is. I respect your opinion but please also respect mine. Im not forcing you to agree with me ... but like i sad i "DON"T" whant to make porn of P:E i just whant women look like women and interact like women ... noting more

Is my gif somehow unclear to you? I do not care you're trying to insult me ​​but you did not.

We know that the P: E is a mature storyline (At least they say it will). But what about mature +18 content, sexuality prostitution, nudity etc. In my opinion P:E shoud be more like dark-fantasy and it whoud me great to see this type of content(but subtly). This thret also has a litle bit to do abour romances (companions, npc, player etc) but not "IF romances will be added" but "IF they will by added then with mature content or no" I'am not fan of dragon age romances (and sex scenes like from mass efect) but i like how they where added in witcher ( Not sexscenes but sex cards and only sound in the in the distance.... I whant to know your opininion. of course i don't whant P:E to become a porn or daiting game but in my opinion sex is normal thing between people and putting it dawn it just putting down other relationships an adding will make game more realistic ....

Then why " good morning america, and the rest of the world ? " When i think it's simple mistake and he shoud say "Good morning people" then in america where morning but when we aple to the original then all ower the world where morning ... ? This is second thing i think it was mistake (but im not offendet i only say what i think )

Or Good morning, people

Not only america is watching and funding you guys He said "and the rest of the world" later. I think it's simple mistake ... not so big nothing to be angry about but somethimes when i hear "America is better then rest of the world" (Not Josh) it's a little bit pathetic. I think in case of Josh is simple lingustic misake but there are many of americans (espacialy in hollywood) that thinks that america is the greatest .. it makes me only laught. Especially when i see this clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYraAqwu-V0 And don't get angry, Each nation has its drawbacks. But it pretty funny when i see some "US" guys thinking that they are most important. Every nation thinks that they are better then at least one of other nations. But americans (some of them) are unique in this matter thinking that they are more important ...then ANY other. And i say it again it's not atack it just some funny material ... hehe Sorry for off top

Aumakua From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search In Hawaiian mythology, an ʻaumakua (/aʊˈmɑːkuːə/; often spelled aumakua) is a family god, often a deified ancestor. The Hawaiian plural of ʻaumakua is nā ʻaumākua ([naːˈʔɐumaːˈkuwə]), although in English the plural is usually ʻaumakuas. Nā ʻaumākua frequently manifested as animals such as sharks or owls. Nā ʻaumākua were worshipped at localities (often rocks) where they were believed to "dwell". The appearance of an animal one regarded as an ʻaumakua was often believed to be an omen (of good or ill). There are also many stories of nā ʻaumākua (in animal form) intervening to save their descendants from harm. It was extremely bad luck to harm a manifested ʻaumakua. Some families had many ʻaumakua. Mary Kawena Pukui's family had at least fifty known ʻaumakua.[1] Nā ʻaumākua were thus animals, places or rocks, and people. Ancient Hawaiians would have seen no contradiction in a powerful spirit being able to appear as all three, switching from form to form as convenient—as is indeed seen in many stories of gods and demigods. A symbiotic relationship exists between person and ʻaumakua, the personal guardians of each individual and their family and the ancient source gods from whom Hawaiians were descended. ʻAumakua can manifest in nature. The form varies family to family. Whatever its form, the ʻaumakua is one specific shark, owl, etc. However, all members of the species are treated with respect of family members. If family ʻaumakua, these manifestations were not harmed or eaten; in turn, ʻaumakua warned and reprimanded in dreams, visions, and calls. "ʻAumākua are intimate members of the human family, spiritual relationships with them are especially close and their presence is sought for feast and festivity, as well as in time of crisis. They act as healers and advisors, counteracting troubles and punishing faults." - J. Gutmanis ʻAumākua could appear as: honu (turtle) pueo, owl (as at Manoa, Oʻahu, Kau and Puna) manō, shark (all islands except Kauaʻi) ʻalalā, crow (island of Hawaiʻi)[2] ʻio, hawk (on island of Hawaiʻi) ʻelepaio, monarch flycatcher (also the goddess of canoe makers) ʻiʻiwi, honeycreeper (whose feathers were used extensively in featherwork) ʻalae ʻula,[3] moorhen (whose cry was considered a bad omen) heʻe, octopus puhi, eel ʻiole liʻiliʻi, mouse ʻiole, rat ʻīlio, dog moʻo, lizard, or dragon [4] peʻelua/ʻenuhe/nuhe/ʻanuhe/poko, caterpillar pōhaku, rock leho, cowry ao, cloud mea kanu, plant

I like this idea, half-orcs was always ilustraded like ugly-brutish-idiots and they where weekwhen you compere them expecially to dwarves. Aumaua can be strong like half-orcs but they not need to be stupid and ugly, they can also have their own culture (not like half-orcs)....

Ofcoure they where, they where traders and some times invaders. There are no notcomplicated races/nations every nations has at least 2 faces but we can tell that they where not only traders but also they where invading ... and you can't disagree that they was not becouse it's historical fact. Aumaua can be the same, somtimes trading somtimes invaiding ... 2 faces of the same race ,,,

It all depends, there are many nations that livied near the sea and was wery agressive, Vikings lived in "Coastal" regions and invaded land from slavic world, german, england, france and they where even seen near italy and byzantium. Japanesse where atacking several times they naighbor china and korea. Englad where atacking france several times and they colonised north america (this colony become US later) Spain and portugal also lived surauded my seas and they fight a wars several times, they also distroyed many south american civilizations. Italy (Former Roman Empire) atact and was invaiding many european nations, many asia minor nations and even north africa. So i don't think that coastal nations are "prone to peaceful coexistence" only Genoa was fitting to this discription .... but only becose they don't have large armies ....

I find an iteresting image from movie prometheus ... Do you think that aumaua whoud look like this ? (It fitts discription)

I wrote "AQUATIC" not "amphibians". Amphibians are water creatures exacly like Cephalopods and fish (they came from water or at least lives in it). That's why i put "Water-like races"(Aquatic in poll)

Yeah i like everything sound "Uber" (Uber Diablo, Uber Mefisto, Uber baal ) but i will survive and even mayby even play this race if its some kind of "Qunari-Giant-like" or "ogre-orc" like. I personaly thing that Animal like (Centaurs,Taurens) are also good idea but this coud strongly affect interactions with other races and if romances will be in game a tauren-human romance is a little to much for me (its zoophillia in some sence) and orc or giant with human aslo be strange but not as much.... I will play this race still if its the races i writhed above but if its reptilian, aquatic or bird-people ... i will just pretend this race don't exist ...

This poll is about your expectations and speculation about this race. Im waiting for your opinions.

Yeh, i hope so but "while still having definite and distinct visual cues as to their origins as well" I don't know if i understand you.... you mean that they will look diffrent then humans ? Achilles, Hercules haven't. I personaly think that ony difrences can be blond/silver heir glowing eyes etc. NO TAILS, NO Animal like heads..... I some cases i can survave WINGS but i whoud prefer much more like Achilles fron troy godlike then some kinda angel bastard ....