PK htiw klaw eriF

Who'd you Canada bros vote for? Anybody but those TPP supporting bastards I hope.

Yeah you're not making much sense to me. I understand what you mean about a stronger start(BG was kiting and resting after every battle at level 1-3), but that can be accomplished with better progression design rather than gutting out progression. IMO a great character/progression system would be somewhat similar to an idealized Fallout, with stats being derived from attributes, a skill system that doesn't lock you into a set path, and a robust perk system that allows players to specialize their characters.

When I see someone talking to Bruce, I imagine them shouting at a brick wall with a smiley face painted on it. The latest is the most outrageous of all! And the most obviously false.

And why to people who continuously insist on lecturing others about empathy, while consistently abandoning it (or lacking it to begin with) themselves when it suits them? Truly a puzzle. Clearly he does it so you can fill your signature with choice quotes.

I don't see the big deal about TB getting **** on. It's certainly a **** thing to do, but it is pretty much edgelords beating their chest and it isn't like they haven't done similar stuff before. And at this point, I think the guy has much bigger problems than some idiots on the internet. From what little I've read, that is Adorno's take on music at least.

Trying to make sense of Skyrim's lore/gameplay discrepancies will just result in a migraine.

So feudalism? It's the GG thread, there's going to be drift.

I'd rather be that than be blindly accepting of the USA Freedom Act or TPP. Are those the only two options? No, I hear being snarky on the internet or cynical apathy are also popular.

Well, if Capitalism worked as it should then there wouldn't be any need for affirmative action. Capitalism is working how it should, those who control production, distribution, and exchange of money are being enriched while those that don't control must sell labor in order to subsist with any leftover currency being used for entertainment or purchasing capital in the longshot hope they can utilize it to enrich themselves. No, ideally everybody can become a capitalist. You only need to subsist under your means, work hard to increase the value of your labor and purchase capital. It is not rich people's fault that those lower class plebs have no access to the best education, the money required to start your own business or the connections to make it work. They should had just been born into it like they did. The ideal is a nice sales pitch, but it isn't reality. In current practice, Capitalism tends toward concentration of wealth and stagnation of social mobility. I'm sure someone has an all-new all-different Capitalism that doesn't, but that ain't gonna be implemented peacefully any time soon.

That's terrible, I hope his wife and stepkid are alright.

I'd rather be that than be blindly accepting of the USA Freedom Act or TPP.

Can I ask you a question, I have to be honest I don't understand how you can live in the USA but not like your country? I am probably misunderstanding you ?Because there is a lot to dislike. Off the top of my head: 1) I don't like being spied on by an increasingly authoritarian state. 2) I don't like the power private corporations wield, such as getting laws made that benefit them at the expense of people such as TPP or PIPA. 3) I don't like having money taken from me to support foreign wars and drone assassination. 4) I don't like the political process being blatantly controlled by corporate powers and billionaires. 5) I don't like the tendency to intervene in other countries, usually leaving them worse off, while abandoning citizens here.

Well that's depressing as ****.

Well, if Capitalism worked as it should then there wouldn't be any need for affirmative action. Capitalism is working how it should, those who control production, distribution, and exchange of money are being enriched while those that don't control must sell labor in order to subsist with any leftover currency being used for entertainment or purchasing capital in the longshot hope they can utilize it to enrich themselves.

I don't care, I've got thick skin and don't hold any love for the US. But trolling them is pretty funny.

How is any sane person not a Capitalist under that broad definition? They weren't blessed with ownership of production or distribution. Thats just an excuse to not work hard and achieve something meaningful....yes KP no one is going to give you wealth or success , you will have to do it yourself I'm glad to know that working 40 hours a week while taking care of my sick mother and going to university isn't working hard.

How is any sane person not a Capitalist under that broad definition? They weren't blessed with ownership of production or distribution.

Fixed it for you. If we're defining capitalism as "an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth." how is Hillary not a Capitalist?

Well ****, I bet $20 that this wouldn't be released until 2020.

Call me when Sanders produces something as good as It's happening. Then I will consider his meme force on par with Paul. Until then he's just a social democrat who has a better record opposing infringements on privacy than the other mainstream candidates. He is also endorsed by Lil'B.

After getting some sleep on it, I believe Chaffe will be the first to drop out. He got the least amount of speaking time and while he did praise Snowden and call out Hillary on Benghazi, but his explanation for voting to repeal Glass-Seagal or authorize the PATRIOT act was weak as hell despite being honest. Webb looks to take the mantle of "moderate", but he needs more speaking time. Would have liked to hear more of substance from him, but he handled what time he had well. O'Mally positioned himself as a different flavor of Clinton with more focus on clean energy, but I don't think he managed to differentiate himself enough to compete with the frontrunner. And the grid talk was more annoying than anything. Hillary was what I expected, an attempt to look tougher than Sanders and hyping her status as a woman. Will probably absorb half of Chaffee's support and will have to be called out to do any damage to her lead. Sanders was a disappointment. His unwillingness to challenge Hillary on anything might raise his appeal to democratic primary voters, but it made his points look muddy and lack definition, and him not wanting Hillary to be held accountable for her actions(real or imagined) was weak. Will probably be spun as Stalin 2.0 when in reality is Tsipras. Overall boring and uneventful. The best option would be for Trump to destroy the world economy and throw everything into chaos, but it's pretty clear Trump is a Hillary shill so the most likely outcome is Clinton 5th term or Bush 3rd term and the only difference between those is that the government wears a smiley face mask while spying on people and fellating the oligarchs.

You need a twitter account dedicated to vegan crossfit.

Well that was uneventful.

Anderson looks like he's just going to say "**** it" and grab a bottle of spirits.

I'd be happy with Trump because the world will crash and burn. And then I can use all the ammunition I've been hoarding.