melkathi

I found the solution to most annoyances with Bethesda games is solved by hitting ~ then typing tgm Of course I realised by doing that I kinda skip playing the game, so my solution to my grievances with Bethesda games is ignoring the games altogether.

That sounds a bit like removing chewing gum in Arcade Simulator. I can't build a gaming empire, I am too busy scraping gum off random spots customers stuck it.

Why make a remaster of a Bethesda game? Even without a remaster, they only ever made one game and are remaking it over and over again with new textures.

That game really clicked with me. The plot isn't groundbreaking. The UI isn't the prettiest. But it was the closest a PC game got to the fun of being a teenager and hanging out with friends playing DnD.

Blame Star Trek. Tricorders became the easy excuse to have insta-science.

If that trailer is supposed to be inspiring though... whoever made it may be professionals, but they didn't get the job done.

Yeah, I gave up on Phantom Doctrine pretty quickly as well and put it into the wasted money category.

I tried to start a new playthrough of Outer Worlds - and try the dlc - but am realizing that I care so little for the story, I find it a chore.

I finished Black Book and really enjoyed it. Rural pre-revolution folklore Russia is a great setting. The main plot points of the story were predictable, but the road there was refreshingly different due to the setting. Finished with 0 sins, so eventually might do an evil playthrough with loads of sins.

The only thing I hated about Owlcat's Pathfinder games and what ultimately stopped me from playing them is the overabundance of stat reducing effects, Almost every enemy reduces your stats each time they blink at you.

The price tag on the Age of Wonders DLC did look like a bad April Fools joke. 25 euros for one new leader type.

Incidentally, the pillar of gaming journalism, PC Gamer, listed Age of Wonders 4: Giant Kings as an April Fool's joke, because they couldn't be bothered to actually check releases and simply decided everything today is a lie. They have since corrected their article.

I think she is the only interaction people consider a proper romance option. Even though, as most things with Arcanum, it wasn't fleshed out. Arcanum has the same curse as Fallout 2, so many ideas for npcs and no time to really work on all of them. Though with Fallout 2, with Sulik, Myron, and Marcus having the animated dialogues made it so much more obvious that there were things not implemented for every companion.

Please report this post to the mods. Bruce's account was hacked. Or it is the invasion of the bodysnatchers. The real Bruce would have romanced Raven. This fake Bruce didn't even talk about romance options.

The survey about a GOG subscription service is terrible. You can't pick the option "f off, I hate subscription services". Instead they go "even if you do not find the service interesting what do you think other people could find interesting". In the end people like myself will quit the survey, so they will only get a limited feedback that will show a 100% interest in the service. And as a bonus they will get some people who will be irritated their time was wasted with a stupid survey (as demonstrated by this post).