Everything posted by IndiraLightfoot
-
Update #58 - The Forgotten Sanctum Preview
IndiraLightfoot replied to a post in a topic in Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire Announcements & News@Raffster Now there's an enthusiasm we wouldn't wanna curb! Enjoy the new DLC+patch, mate!
- What are you playing right now?
-
New new Obsidian game, what is it?
BG3 is all that we really care about! Admit it, 'tis true, deep down in your heart, there's this yearning…
-
Trailer gets 1 million views in less than a day
3.4 Million views now!
-
Please give us an optional third person camera.
Same here. I played through F:NV without using VATS. I tried it in another playthrough, but I didn't enjoy it.
-
Who owns the IP?
One firm to rule them all! Blackrock. EDIT: Lol, WoW typo. I meant Dark Rock Industries.
-
Trailer gets 1 million views in less than a day
And then Obsidian will buy Microsoft. Come to think of it: Aren't the names of these two companies almost binary opposites?
-
Please give us an optional third person camera.
Great digging, Chairchucker! Yeah, we prolly won't get a 3rd person perspective in this game, but, like he says, in its sequel (or perhaps in some hefty DLC later on).
-
Will this game atone for Pillars of Eternity?
IndiraLightfoot replied to Monte Carlo's topic in The Outer Worlds: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)It was terreformed? I thought one was habitable for human life, and the other major planet was thought to be but turned out not. It was, and it has been lived on for 70yrs, while the terraforming of the other planet failed (it's most likely the ominously close and ringed backdrop planet, at least according to the summary vid I posted in another thread.
-
Will this game atone for Pillars of Eternity?
IndiraLightfoot replied to Monte Carlo's topic in The Outer Worlds: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)Well, as for who's working on the game, thanks to Finnish sisu, as if on cue: https://forums.obsidian.net/topic/107063-so-who-is-working-on-this-game/
-
Will this game atone for Pillars of Eternity?
IndiraLightfoot replied to Monte Carlo's topic in The Outer Worlds: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)Welcome back, Monte Carlo! (The one and only MC on these forums, IMHO. While others wear hypo helmets, he's got the full ABEK kit.) @MC: From what we know so far: -Setting: Two far-off planets, one successfully terraformed, the other not. It's like Borderlands 2, F:NV, and Rage have been rolled into one gameworld -Story: Vying terraforming corporations, dark humour, light humour, sprinkled with alien gore, mirroring our own issues at Tellus -Gameplay: FPS -CRPG status: "Hardcore RPG", not full on open world, and no ARPG loot fest
-
No romance!
Boero-mancing!
-
Please give us an optional third person camera.
I've never used it, but apparently there's a Nexus mod for Borderlands 2, turning the game into 3rd person mode. Perhaps Obsidian should just integrate this option from the start, if it's not too much of a hassle.
-
Please give us an optional third person camera.
@EDK Not that you're wrong in any way, but I couldn't help adjusting your post:
-
Trailer gets 1 million views in less than a day
2.5Millions now. You forget some points : - VGA event - From the orginal creators of FALLOUT - And the Developpers of FALLOUT NV This... one month after the poor Fallout 76. Yeah, and just recently, an informal little poll showed that Fallout New Vegas is Obsidian's most popular game among the forum visitors here. I think Algroth's big best game ever list here on the forums not so long ago revealed the same. F:NV is held in high regard, among most gamers and among the Obsidian fans.
-
Trailer gets 1 million views in less than a day
The official Deadfire campaign trailer has like 716,000 view today, years later. Apparently, futuristic space sagas sell.
-
Gameplay 14min
Like others, I'd also like to add my concern over the combat mechanics and the character build systems, and the variety and options we'd get. SPOILER WARNING!!! Oh, and if you, like me, get tired of reading a bunch of articles, here's a nice guy that really summarizes almost all that we know neatly and informatively in like 17 minutes: Limited to 2 companions, you can't dump stuff in their inventory, and you can pick leadership skills to make them better. Enemies will scale to your level, but some areas will have tougher enemies, always.
-
Gameplay 14min
[Youtube] At the 25:50 timestamp, both Leonard and Tim acknowledge that Outer Worlds will be "a hardcore RPG". They also mention that they have different kinds of humour (L's dark and gross, and Tim's lighter and sillier, and that the game will have become better for it.) This is a very cool interview with Leonard, where he, amongst many things, tells us about how he wanted to make Diablo 3 much more of a CRPG, and that is why Blizzard hired him. But obviously, they scrapped that idea. Interesting that Blizzard and Interplay were pretty close-knit back then.
-
Gameplay 14min
Yeah, this is at least the second best option for me. What I really, really wanted was an isoemtric deep party-based CRPG in the Outer Worlds, but now, having been shown what it seems to be, I'd be quite happy to play a Borderlands 2 like-game, with lots of quirky humour, loads of monsters and baddies to kill with a hefty arsenal to pick from. And the devs, being who they are, surely have made certain that the story is deeper, and the world less open than Borderlands 2. Still, Borderlands 2, is indeed a series of chapters with semi-linear to full-linear story in each of them. Here and there, you get a companion for a while, and here, I suspect, they are more integral to the game and the gameplay. Even graphically, BL2 and TOW are more or less on par. I played BL2 solo this summer, and I enjoyed myself immensely. I'm one of those lucky people that don't experience motion sickness in computer games, not even in flight simulators. However, I do get easily car sick or sea sick in real life. I know, it's so weird. It's like my brain always can tell if it's real life motion or not. I've even been in those hydraulic advanced simulator thingies. Still, I didn't get sick, as I only registered the hydraulic movement for it was, not what the screen tried to sell me.
-
Game crashes in "Old City Lift"
IndiraLightfoot replied to McBrain's topic in Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire Technical Support (Spoiler Warning!)The sad thing is that this bug has been present since the game got released, and it has been reported extensively. This bug refuses to be squashed. IIRC, it was my only crash to desktop during my entire PotD playhtrough in May.
-
The timing of the reveal of Outer Worlds is perfect after the Fallout 76 fallout
IndiraLightfoot replied to IndiraLightfoot's topic in The Outer Worlds: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)Now that we know that it isn't a huge open world game, I'd say this is another great selling point. They can emphasize the RPG side of it, and hopefully replayability and such.
-
only real time or also VATS?
IndiraLightfoot replied to Madscientist's topic in The Outer Worlds: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)^This, so much this!
-
Gameplay 14min
Yeah. While I don't mind a few games like that, it's just that we have a gazillion of them already, and most of them are bad or worse.
-
Paging Ethics Gradient
Ethereal Gradient, a cool cyber ghost in Outer worlds, please!
-
Gameplay 14min
This was pretty fab! Stuff I really liked: -The red cyber scythe/sickle! -The interiors -The dialogue Stuff other people are complaining about: -Lots of hate on the lighting in this game (I admit, it's stark and a bit off/blueish cold. But is it really that bad?) -The triangle markers/arrows over the heads of baddies (Isn't that just some ability?) Stuff I'm on the fence about: -The bobbing gun and it's rather limp grip a bit too deep into the screen (I very much prefer the cyber sickle) -The outlines around the baddies when killed (too prominent. Perhaps there will be a toggle)