Jump to content
The Community Blog (An Invitation)

TrashMan

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1516

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TrashMan

  1. TrashMan
    aaaand... http://cdn.acidcow.com/pics/20130315/acid_picdump_101.jpg
  2. TrashMan
    This is kinda creepy:
  3. TrashMan
    I AM NOT A TROLL!
  4. TrashMan
  5. TrashMan
    Knee-jerk reactions and giving ratings out of desire for revenge or "justice" is one of the most unproductive and worst things one can do. Objectivity - or at least emotional detachment - is a necessity for anyone attempting to review something.
  6. TrashMan
    Muscles are the most awesome thing EVER! But...boobs ain't bad. Close second! And they exist to please the Patriarchy! ALL HAIL THE PATRIARCHY!
  7. TrashMan
    Back problems? Yes, we men face those..because of our vastly superior body build and upper body strength, our poor backs are under greater stress. Yes, women have those airbags they call breasts. But we have bulging, rippling, dense muscle!
  8. TrashMan
    http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-oppress-women.png
  9. TrashMan
    *WARNING* Project "Geneiss" compromised! Initiate containment routines. ... Information breach located. User: Longknife Tracking IP adress...done Accessing gateway location database...done Triangulating position...done GPS coordinates locked. Cleaning team dispatched. ... CLEANING IN PROGRESS. ALL FORUMITES RETURN TO NORMAL ACTIVITIES. There is nothing to see here. Move along.
  10. TrashMan
    Or maybe... MANLY MAN. Manly Man - In this day and age of political correctness (read: pussies), masculinity is a confusing and dangerous issue. Heterosexual men and boys of today find themselves in need of a role model who isn't a ****, and that role model is the male chauvinist whom male chauvinist pigs wish they were: Manly Man. Manly Man once took on Chuck Norris and Maddox in a fight and won by staring at them until they turned gay and made out with each other, this distraction allowing Manly to punch them into orbit, where they still are to this day.
  11. TrashMan
    FINAL FACT: Bruce Lee is dead. Chuck Norris isn't.
  12. TrashMan
    Normally that would be true, but Patriarch Norrises manliness is too great to be hidden. It seeps into the word from His holy persona. To attempt to hide it list trying to hide the sun and the stars!
  13. TrashMan
    Brothers. Men. I am schocked to see the the Manliest of the Manliest has not appeared in this thread. Do we not all bow to Him that is perfection? Do we not owe our own manliness to Him? He destroys the evil feminatzi's!
  14. TrashMan
    Admit what?
  15. TrashMan
    Except it didn't have to. Not anymore than the US HAD to invade Iraq. Again with the nebulous future. If you plan to exterminate future threats, better exterminate EVERYONE then. Wht future japan threat? Japan had NOTHING left. It would have to be beyond insane to attack a post-WW2 USA with 20000 nukes. And how are you making it obvious? Is my bargaining position stronger or weaker if I'm pointing the gun at you? Kinda hard to talk if I happen to be shooting. Funny thing about right and wrong is that it is widely considered subjective. Call my notions childish? Go ahead. I consider yours retarded. I guess moralizing comes easy when you're always paying the price in other peoples lives?
  16. TrashMan
    Only after you admit to being a ditry, unwashed, unecudated redneck pedophile canibalistic hooker who was abducted by space aliens and forced into a weight loss program.
  17. TrashMan
    Yes. Hitlers days were at the end anyway (with all the assasination attempts) What do korea and the USSR have to do with anything? You don't need to nuke the enemy into oblivion. You don't need unconditional surrender. And you can't build a powerful navy over night (Japan sure as hell coun't, and even if they could, they couldnt' supply them with fuel) In which case that example just proves how ineffective it is to hit another country that hard. It just creates resentment. A couple of year in the future? The future in't written. Every country can recover given time, resources and will. Nuking it doesn't change that. Bombing the living s*** doesn't change that. It just costs more lives SOME. Keyword. You iz eithr stupid or you don't bother reading. I said "you don't need unconditional surrender". That does not mean "ro reparations or conditions". Why do I even bother?
  18. TrashMan
    Army? Crushed. Oil reserves? Depleted. Fighting potential? Minimal. No, Japan didn't pose a "Serious threat" to the US. The US just watned a UNCONDITIONAL surrender, not a conditional one. And yes, when you get the entire world arrayed agasint you and when your'e beaten badly and pushed back, I'd say you don't posses a credible threat. Nations in WW2 and generally always want to end the war on their terms regardless of cost. They don't want to just defend their territory - once they start winning they want to take as much as they can. The military and industrial powerhouse that is US looking over their shoulder? HA! You must be living in some fantasy land of your own to think Japan would be able to touch the USA near the end of the war. It was outnumbered, outteched, outgun and lacking everything, including the abiltiy to project power with it's entire navy in shambles and it's airforce a mere shadow of it's self.
  19. TrashMan
    is good that you reveal your lack o' any desire or capacity to be reasonable. sure, virtual all reputable historians believe either that the bombs scared japan into surrender, or that it were actual the russian deceleration o' war that set nails to proverbial japanese coffin, but that doesn't fit with your world view, so you chose not to give a "rats ass" 'bout reason or history. is no different than your pov on israel-arab conflict. no surprise. you don't give a "rats ass" what anyone says. HA! Good Fun! No, I don't give a rats ass because it doesn't matter in the broader context. Japan at that point did not present a threat to the US. Ergo, there was no need to invade. If a man breaks into your house, the "reasonable defense" doesn't hold up if you beat him back, then chase him to his home and murder him. And I don't give a rats ass what YOU say becasue you revealed YOUR lack of "desire or capacity to be reasonable". It's so easy to talk smack and call everyone who disagrees unreasoanble and uninformed. Of course the problem with such an approach is that is murders any discussion since it apriori discredits and insults the other party and renders them unwilling to discuss furhter (Partially because it paints you as someone who's set in their views and cannot be reasoned with, partially because it confirmes that you see them that way). Also: http://www.democracynow.org/2014/8/7/a_hideous_atrocity_noam_chomsky_on
  20. TrashMan
    I don't give a rats ass about his estimates of casualties during a full-scale US invasion. There was no need for any furhter invasion. No need for any furhter war. The US wasn't saving anyone at that point anymore.
  21. TrashMan
    A different time and conditions. Natzi germany was hiding it's extermianton camps from the world, and back then there was no such thing as UN and that much external pressure. These days countreis have to make their actions look good. Everything is for "defense of freedom, democracy and all that jazz".
  22. TrashMan
    Yes they can. And yes they have. Trought history. Learn a bit, you'd be surprised. It's populat to use stereotypes and special/singular events and inflate them to over 9000, but that's not how the world works. Irocnically, often in the past people have been more tolerant than today.
  23. TrashMan
    Here you go : http://archive.adl.org/israel/israel_sbarro.html If you don't believe my source, you can google it yourself. Thi proves a bunch of students did it. Nothing more. How do you go from "some students from a single university" to "the majority of palestinians'?
  24. TrashMan
    I want proof. Also, there are plenty of Israelis who cheered the bombing and casualites and happily called Gaza a graveyard, saying "there will be no children in Gaza". You gut crazies on both sides that will quite hapilly cheer on genocide.
  25. TrashMan
    Now this is where we disagree, I will take the actions of Israel which are excessive over that of Islamic fundamentalism any day. Just look around the world at the likes of Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab and Boko Haram. And ask yourself who you would rather have in your camp? Despite the issues around how Israel has acted now during this conflict they are no where near as brutal and intransigent as the extremist groups I have mentioned. And lets not kid ourselves, Hamas is an Islamic extremist group despite how they portray themselves IMO If I were to take into account the body count produced by Israel vs. the bodycount produced by Hamas...no contest. Hamas any day. At least they aren't competent or powerful enough to do as much damage. Not to mention that the reason Hamas exists and gets support IS Israels policies and behavior.
×
×
  • Create New...