Elerond

So more rebels, terrorist and supporters of al-Assad is answer to current crisis, I see.

I would say that double edged lasersaber could be used in similar fashion as quarterstaff(short staff in half-staff grip. And it could have some advantages over regular lightsaber like ability block and bind opponent's saber with one edge and attack with another. But I would say also that it don't have similar reach advantage as staff does as you can't move to grip to quarter of staff grip to give you longer reach and jabs have much shorter distance and don't have similar reach and speed advantage as they have in regular staff fighting. Of course laser edges bring some of their own advantages (and disadvantages) that regular staffs (even edged staffs) don't have. But really there is no logic in lasersabres as if star wars universe would have even close similar physics than our universe lasersaber would be mostly weaker choice than regular sword. But we know that it isn't true and Star Wars universe have its own physics that differ from ones that we are familiar with. And overall lasersaber is very unpractical choice of weaponry especially in context where it is used, but do people really care of that fact? Probably not .

It should remembered that every jedi and sith should make their own lightsabers and current sith didn't really have anybody to show and teach what they should aim towards (like how Luke just copied his father's lightsaber design, who used Obi-Wan Kenobi's design and so on), so its unique look in Star Wars universe could be because of that.(even though in reality it is just because movie's costume designer liked that look)

What is EU4? Europa Universalis IV, it is grand strategy game, that focuses on civilization management, from Paradox Interactive.

It is just like western countries have never killed anybody it is just made look like they have done so by using dummies. And western countries have never enslaved anybody, or occupied lands like Malaysia, all those are acted ruses that didn't really happen.

No. Vailian Republics is like Canada, Australia or New Zealand and Old Vailian is Great Britain. (Or maybe Brasil as Vailian Republics and Portugal as Old Vailian would be better example as Vailian language has it roots in romance languages)

There is a ongoing terrorist attack in Mali where terrorist are holding 170 people in hotel. Media sources say jihadists, no knowledge if they belong ISIS or boko haran or some other group

It was added in Treaty of Lisbon this is fist time it's triggered.

France in war against ISIS/terrorism is at least somewhat understandable after two terrorist attacks in one year, but what I find more troubling is how quietly and bit celebrating at least Finnish media has taken the fact that article 222 from Treaty of Lisbon was triggered by France and EU's Defense ministers accepted it, so whole EU is now effectively in war with ISIS/terrorism at least in sense of giving military assistance and troops for France.

They constantly reminded themselves during development what were the core values they promised in KS pitch and what were the additional promises in stretch goals. You can see that Obsidian has tried to realise every promise that they made, even if they didn't have ability to implement it on such level that it is meaningful addition to the game. So I would say that they would had done different decision during development if they hadn't been so locked by their promises during KS.

Do you really not see a difference between Not taking initiative to publicly mourn something, as long as no-one is asking you to.and Actively showing disrespect and spite for other people's mourning, like booing(!) a minute of silence.? Let's just disingenuously group both of those under "not caring enough" and equivocate away? PS: Also, it makes perfect sense for FIFA to a have a minute of silence when a major terrorist attack happened right next to its own soccer game, and the terrorists in fact tried to target that game's audience and players - while not having a minute of silence for every other unrelated tragedy around the world. The core of the problem is, that no one asked anyone to mourn for Turkey, Russia, Lebanon, Kenya... Some people then might come to conclusion, that some lives are not as worthy as others... Although people have been asked to mourn Turkey, Russia, Lebanon, Kenya, Tunisia, Nigeria (most recent victim), etc, tragedies. But ones doing the asking aren't necessary always same also stage where mourning is done changes. But tragedies in home front get always more recognition than tragedies else where. So tragedies, in west get more notice in west than tragedies that happen in somewhere else. Because not in sight not in mind is very real psychological phenomenon that effects most of the people in world. Western tragedies are often more noticeable around world because western media is so dominant compared to other medias. And of course all western countries aren't equal, like for example tragedy in Finland gets much less notice than similar tragedy in USA. But it is just reality that those with more power and influence get more notice than those with less.

Victim is always the predator, if we listen those that support the attacker. There are always things that victim did to provoke the attack at least for the attacker, because attackers very rarely accept that fault is solely in them.

Grenades are excellent in areas that are infested by feral ghouls as you can throw one every time you see ghouls starting to spawn (wake up and crawl in from windows and other holes) as they usually kill most of the spawning ghouls. But I hate fact that they are binded in same key as bash

Like this Answer is usually nothing happens. Really? http://anonhq.com/charlie-hebdo-fired-anti-semitic-cartoonist-ridiculing-judaism-2009/ As I said usually nothing, but in this case Charlie Hebdo had to pay Maurice Sinet 40000€ for wrongful termination. Meaning that his firing was against law. EDIT: Also just to point out he is also person that said this, in interview shortly after terrorist attack against Jews in Paris 1982, "Yes, I am anti-Semitic and I am not scared to admit it ... I want all Jews to live in fear, unless they are pro-Palestinian. Let them die." EDIT2: Also it isn't only speaks against Jews that can get you fired. As also openly speaking against Islam and Muslims can cause same reaction. http://www.dw.com/en/prominent-french-journalist-and-tv-personality-fired-for-islamophobia/a-18145516 (dated 22.12.2014) "Polarizing French journalist and writer, Eric Zemmour, has been sacked from his recurring gig on a French chat show for the iTELE channel following remarks widely seen as anti-Islamic last week."

Like this Answer is usually nothing happens.

Muslims would make so good communists if there wasn't that part of communism that say that all religions are evil and should be banned. People don't act without realizing when they are drunk, their ability to control their impulses weakens significantly, as do their ability for fine motor control over their body. So if you one might to commit murder, rape, adultery or some other nasty act when they are drunk there is high change that they also could do such acts when they aren't drunk. Bad behavior is not caused by alcohol, but those person themselves that behave badly. Alcohol may cause them act bad way in public because their ability to think consequences of their actions has been weakened, but behavior itself comes from people themselves.

They burned lots more than just books from Jews. They also burned books from communists and some other groups of people the didn't like, like for example Muslims. Germans achieved as high technology as most other nations with resources in that time. They had bit lead in military technology as they prepared to war where other nations focused to make everyday lives of their citizens better, like for example penicillin and other medical breakthroughs that have given us ability vanquish lots of deadly diseases.

That is funniest claim that I have read today. 10/10 and parrot mark. I approve. It is not a claim, watch the video, Germans was devout Catholic and practicing Catholic laws under the Nazi. True Christians don't get drunk. Today Christians are secular Christians and drunk Yeah, but I am currently drinking German beer that comes from brewery that is founded 1543 AD. And I know that there are hundreds, even thousands such old breweries in German. Also Catholic church and other major Christian religions don't ban consumption of alcoholic beverages. It should be noted that one of the miracles that Christians believe Jesus did is to change water to wine so that everybody in party can continue to drink. There are Christian religions that look badly drinking and encourage or even ban drinking alcoholic beverages, but those have been always minority within Christians and are most of the time considered to be extremist movements. But true and not so true Christians have drunk alcohol as long as Christianity has existed.

Such book would be allowed in most western countries without second glance from our governments. Private citizens would probably organize book burning events and lament how bad said book is, but that probably would be it. Because there is no point to ban such books as people could easily read same thing from internet and banning such books just give them more power. As far as i know, only in America having "burn the Quran day".....no country ever burn any books. Book banning is not book burning. Bans can be lifted, otherwise it remain in storage, or not even allowed to enter the country Most of banned books are destroyed, some time literally burning them most of time they are just recycled and paper from them is used from somewhere else. This of course don't mean that every copy of banned books are destroyed, but usually most of them. (This of course references cases where banner is government) Nazis for example burned thousands of books, and similar burnings have been actually quite common in history. USA maybe only country that has "burn the Quran day", but it is not only country which citizens have done such acts. But these are cases where private citizen burning books that they usually own themselves, not government banning and destroying them. And yes bans can be lifted and there can be new runs of said books. As said banning and burning books don't destroy/prevent content of those books.

That is funniest claim that I have read today. 10/10 and parrot mark. I approve.

Such book would be allowed in most western countries without second glance from our governments. Private citizens would probably organize book burning events and lament how bad said book is, but that probably would be it. Because there is no point to ban such books as people could easily read same thing from internet and banning such books just give them more power.

That is name that Jewry use of their god/the God (if we take idea that all Abrahamic religions worship same god). Bible if it is Christian bible should not have any specific name for the God as naming him is one of the worst sins that a Christian can do. Although I know that there are some religions that use Bible and they give name for the God, but they aren't considered to be Christians by main Christian religions.

I have never ever heard of Malaysians being called Barbarians ? We refer to murderous groups like ISIS or Boko Haram as savages but not Malaysians as we do business there Because my country is just recently become popular in USA, but back in 70s and 80s western people call us barbarians who live on trees... Hundred they called us (Finns) subhumans that are closer to monkeys than humans that should not be allowed to get citizenship in USA if that gives you any consolation.

Things that currently are counted as most evil, vicious, horrible, etc. in world history are things that our grandfathers did. Which is why such concepts as fundamental human rights, current refugee treaties etc. were created in first place.

Elerond do you really think applying some obscure EU law is necessary But something just occurred to me...I seem to debating with you guys who live in the EU about this, I thought this was what you wanted but if not then just leave it It is not EU law it is European Convention on Human Rights, which is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, article. Those are right that no individual state or even EU can change alone and all states that have signed it have promised to follow it and make sure that others follow it too. European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is independent court that monitors that member states follow it, passes punishment for those who broke it and decides how things go when there aren't straightforward answer. So it is embodiment of human rights in Europe, not some obscure law.