kumquatq3

two new screenshots on gamespy? Looks like chronical update time.

nice

there are also new screenshots/concept art.....which also mostly suck ass

but then, in an rpg, a jedi can use a pistol or fight HtH.

but you do see the problems with that right? It's like being able to play Superman and batman in the same game. Batman is great and can do alot of stuff, but he's not freaking superman. Batman isn't stopping the comet coming towards earth.

Frankly, most weapons in SW are one shot kills. You pretty much have to break canon to make a game.

It's not like Hades doesn't have a point about lack of playable non jedi classes and the break in canon with having jedi using pistols, it's just that people disagree on how big of an effect that makes on the game/players enjoyment.

I was thinking it might be, but I didn't know for sure either way. Did you hear that anywhere specific?

Look I agree that having non-jedi classes would be better, if they worked (tho I think you can imagine some problems that would arrise from that. A regular Gijoe guy blasting away dark jedi left and right seems as bad as having lightsabers that can't cut through anything. Not to meantion that you then lose the whole "force alignment" angle of the game. Which I imagine might make it harder to craft a story to fit all possible characters.). I really think the choice to force the player into the role of a jedi is due to the choice to make the LS/DS and NPCs systems (seemingly) deeper and more meaningful. As for jedi being the same: The three classes arn't so different than having a Magic User/ Intermidiate/ Warrior. As for not using a lightsaber/force: The player will always have some level of useful force powers to use, I agree. It doesn't mean, via the player choices, that a lightsaber is the only viable path for the player. It's like saying you should have been a combat boy in FO because that was the easiest way to beat the game.

I'm sure you can do that again in the second on except ::gasp:: using heavy weapons might actually work this time! Not to mention, as strange as it first strikes me, that you can fight HtH. In general yes, but not nessasarily your guy in K2/K1: Odds are you don't have to use a lightsaber for most of the game and odds are that you don't have to use the force for most of the game. If you choose to use the above: in this one you have force forms and lightsaber forms that might serve to further seperate the classes.

Why? It would work by, for example, lets say a guy needs a droid repaired. He asks you to find someone that can do it or get some part he needs. You can say ok or no, but if your repair skill is high enough you might be able to repair it yourself for him. Maybe you get a bigger reward or something like that because you cut out the middle man.

Good to hear. In K1 they did, more or less. We know the devs have tired to flesh each one out more in K2. We'll see where that leads.

have a forum for it, but put it in a deep dark place

Remember, Cthulhu for President, why vote for the lesser of two evils?

yo.....mama?

he asked if facial hair is evil. he didn't ask if it makes you evil.

yes

Ah yes.....those sewers sucked O, and long ago the devs said that there wouldn't be any superslowmo suits. They didn't say that there wouldn't be any suits, just that they wouldn't be like the K1 suits in terms of speed.

Looked it up and your right

iirc, the skyline they are planning to bring to the states will be based on the G35. So basically you get your wish and then some.

everytime i think of replaying it i can't get past the thought of having to once again slug through the under water parts.

Forget all other arguemnts: Considering K2 for the Xbox is done, I'm doubting they are going to add it to K2 EDIT: something kinda similar to this suggestion is the "slide show ending", which has been (apparently) worked in to K2 in some form. Basically it tells/shows you what effect your actions had on the game univese.

I think they cleaned him up quite a bit since the scene in the trailer. Look at some newer screenshots.

Nice

Well to be fair, there is little in the way of proof (other than a few broad descriptions about what Troy should be like) or agreement about which (if any) of those 11 cities were Troy. In fact, of those that believe that one of them is Troy, the majority has shifted 3 times as to which one it would have to be. at least, thats how I understood it