Raithe

Here's a thought with all those other button mashers out there.. For like, Batman or Sleeping Dogs where you have to press buttons in certain combinations to perform different moves, would you class those as QTE's because they don't actually flash up on screen for you to press them? Or are they just 'skillfull use of gaming abilities' that you perform as and when you need? I'll admit, an overabundance of QTE's with big flashing "Hit Q" "Hit F" "Hit X" with exclamation marks that then lead you into some scripted cinematic that's practically outside the game engine can be a bit annoying and does feel like it's removing you from the game rather then letting you "play" it. - Especially if it's a whole sequence of QTE's.....

Heh. Nope. I try opening task manager and all I get is a solid black screen with the whirly globe icon from Civ V still going. I try alt-tabbing to it, and I get a brief flicker of windows and the taskbar..and then it goes straight back to that black screen. The only way I can get out is to ctl-alt-del and log off. Then everything shuts down. What's bugging me is that if I verify the game files, it keeps downloading the same 1.8Mb files. Every single time. Even if it's just done it. So I'm guessing I'm going to have to waste an hour or three reinstalling the game and then letting it update...

Tried starting a new game of Civ V. <sigh> For some reason it starts up that intro piece of "you are yada yada yada, your great kingdom yada yada yada" and then when it hits the "can you stand the test of time?" it crashes. Screen goes blank, music starts playing, and then it just freezes there, with the music looping a short section over and over. I can ctr-alt-del out, and it shows a small "Terrain Texture Error" message, before flickering back to a completely black screen. To get out of that, I have to ctrl-alt-del and tell it to log me out of the computer.... Spent half an hour looking around for fixes, but nada I've found work. I think I'll just have to uninstall the whole lot.

I have to admit some of the reviews have been interesting. Generally favourable with the whole "while trying to paint a more realistic human, we go from troubled human being.. to apex predator of headshot island" or the "troubled by the first time she has to kill a deer.. to looking at all warm bodies as pinatas chock-full of xp..." I'm half-tempted to try to find room in the budget to pick up a copy and just see what it's like.

Long night of not-sleep, then when I was finally managing to get into that slumber time.. the birds outside my window pretty much seemed to decide then was a good point to be screaming at each other rather then just chirping.... I guess I could say my body seems to be running on mexico time already, so when I fly out maybe I won't have to deal with jet lag....

Of course, I'm surprised feminists haven't hit on Twilight because it showcases a girl whose only purpose in the entire series is to get married to the guy who basically stalks her. Yes, he breaks into her house to watch her sleep. And he's over a hundred years old. Tell me that's a good example of a healthy romance to teach young girls they should yearn for?

Just not from the 8th dimension? There's a small portion of truth in her argument, and a lot of give. But her stance seems to be polarising folks by putting it at one extreme. Or at least, making a lot of people feel as if she's pushing the extreme feminist argument rather then being a point of discussion to debate. Heh, I guess that's like the law on hate crimes. It doesn't matter how you meant something, it matters how someone took it. She might not have meant it that way, but a lot of people seem to be seeing it that way. Of course, we could reverse that for say, men interested in reading romance novels. They're pretty much full of the tropes of "the bad boy ultra macho male who suddenly becomes ultra metrosexual and in touch with their feelings when the right woman comes along" and nobody really complains about that. Hell, I'd think more women would have complaints about that because it's saying that if they can't get their bad boys to change they are obviously not woman enough to do it.. Personally, I think this is getting a lot more vitriol and public noise then it really deserves. Gaming has changed a lot in the last twenty years. It's gone from a freshly birthed area that catered pretty much to the teenage boy, and is now dealing with the pangs of adjusting to a much wider audience as the appeal is now accepted by that mixed audience. The stories weren't used to be anti-feminist, they were used because they appealed to the audience of the time. The audience is changing, the stories are evolving. We've gone from Donkey Kong, Frogger and Double Dragon to the likes of Mass Effect, Metal Gear Solid, Lara Croft (in all her variations), Max Payne, and Beyond Good and Evil. The idea of the Damsel in Distress as a gaming trope is there because it's a trope of a lot of non-gaming stories. It's been around for centuries. Hell, millenia. It's pretty much as archetypal as Saving the World, or going on Rip-Roaring Revenge. To go with a quote used in this article boxofficebuzz - Strong Women in Video Games

Hm, I think what provided a nice chunk of amusement was just how willing they were to have those moments of self-referential fun. The small bits and pieces where they applied elements of background nods and some outright shout-outs to the issues they've had in all three games. The points that all fans have made and argued over, the elements that have become almost ME tropes from the series. When you get down to it, I think you end up spending more time running back and forth around the Strip, meeting companions, and having that party then you do on the entire "mission" part of the dlc. The characters were all doing the things, saying the things that you could see them saying if they were trying to unwind for that brief moment or respite before throwing themselves back into the fight. Grunt's run in with C-Sec and his "explanation" of how it all happened, Tali's "omni-tattoo" when she and Jack got drunk during the party, Zaeed and Garrus working out how to turn Shepard's apartment into a deathtrap in case someone else came gunning for him whilst the party was happening.. Wrex moaning in the bar over the genophage cure and how he's struggling to deal with all the Krogan females wanting him as a father for their firstborn.. Sure, some of the dialogue was campy and ropey, but none of it felt that out of place for the characters speaking it. The whole thing was pretty much a cheese fest in it's way. But I found it an entertaining cheese fest.

@Orogun01, I'm glad to see that in the morass of funnies I throw out, one at least tickled your fancy..

Saw the statistic that 1 in 5 divorces in North America this last year occured because of facebook or some similar social networking medium. At least, the initial grounds for divorce were based on things put on facebook or said social networking....

Hm, and revuln.com released a white paper over how EA's Origin has a few security issues.

For the general quirky literature interest : http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/hey_amazon_wheres_my_money/ On just how much money a popular book can earn it's author..

The Political Cows SOCIALISM You have 2 cows. You give one to your neighbour COMMUNISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both and gives you some milk FASCISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both and sells you some milk NAZISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both and shoots you BUREAUCRATISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then throws the milk away TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND (VENTURE) CAPITALISM You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. You sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States , leaving you with nine cows. No balance sheet provided with the release. The public then buys your bull. SURREALISM You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons. AN AMERICAN CORPORATION You have two cows. You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. Later, you hire a consultant to analyse why the cow has dropped dead. A GREEK CORPORATION You have two cows. You borrow lots of euros to build barns, milking sheds, hay stores, feed sheds, dairies, cold stores, abattoir, cheese unit and packing sheds. You still only have two cows. A FRENCH CORPORATION You have two cows. You go on strike, organise a riot, and block the roads, because you want three cows. A JAPANESE CORPORATION You have two cows. You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk. You then create a clever cow cartoon image called a Cowkimona and market it worldwide. AN ITALIAN CORPORATION You have two cows, but you don't know where they are. You decide to have lunch. A SWISS CORPORATION You have 5000 cows. None of them belong to you. You charge the owners for storing them. A CHINESE CORPORATION You have two cows. You have 300 people milking them. You claim that you have full employment, and high bovine productivity. You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation. AN INDIAN CORPORATION You have two cows. You worship them. A BRITISH CORPORATION You have two cows. Both are mad. AN IRAQI CORPORATION Everyone thinks you have lots of cows. You tell them that you have none. No-one believes you, so they bomb the ** out of you and invade your country. You still have no cows, but at least you are now a Democracy. AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION You have two cows. Business seems pretty good. You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate. A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION You have two cows. The one on the left looks very attractive...

heh, and EA apparently are going even one better.. Inquisitor - EA censors own support number in forums n4g News - EA Censors it's own support number Destructoid - EA Censors its own support number

"What do you mean he's dead grandpa?!" "Well, he is played by Sean Bean, what were you expecting?"

Having a bit of a play around with my Consular this weekend, and I'm being reminded just how annoying that light puzzle on Balmorra is. Now, I like the fact that the area quest isn't a combat thing, but an actual puzzle to solve. The pain is it's one that involves hitting a whole bunch of switches to get the right combination of lights on, and it's open to every manjack idiot who rushes up while you're in the middle of solving it and they start throwing random switches because they don't have a clue...

Well, that one I'd have to hit with the historical trivia that it's only been the last century that pink was an intrinsically feminine colour. Back during the Victorian era, pink was generally used more for boys then girls. You were more likely to find a boy with pink handkerchiefs, cravats, etc, then a girl using the colour, and girls were more likely to have blue shades on their fashion then men. You just can't argue that the colours are intrinsically male or female. They keep changing over time..... But enough of the random trivia for the day...

Although it's always nice to see that the US has such a clear and valid position on it all after their joys of democracy and right of self-determination.. Telegraph Blog: The State Departments Falklands press-briefing was a diplomatic disaster for the US/

My key issue with the "Historic and legal rights: Based on the a) Legacy from Spain", is that the Spanish came after both the initial French and English colonies. In fact, Spain conquered the French colony and claimed it, then later stole the English colony, but to prevent war from erupting made a peace treaty that legally gave the colony back to England. The British presence pulled back in the late 1700's because of troubles with the US. Just after the American Independance, an Argentine Entrepreneur supposedly set up some effort to monitor and handle uncontrolled seal hunting or some such and ended up seizing some American ships. Which prompted the Captain of the USS Lexington to come in and pretty much shoot up the port. There's also a few running arguments from various historians over whether there was anyone on the islands in an official capacity when the British came back. To go with some comments from Klaus Dodds (a History Professor, who yes, teaches Geopolitics at the University of London) during an interview over the Argentine President's letter she sent a couple of months ago:

Well it's still a running argument over whether it was the French, the Spanish, or the English that discovered the islands first. Although there's a good push for a Dutch explorer as well. Both the French and English built settlements on the islands in the late 1700's. The Spanish managed to swipe the French settlement at one point, then later attacked the English and expelled them from the islands. But in the name of preventing war, they were given back to the English. Then with the whole American Independence thing going on and other concerns, the English withdrew their people, but left a plaque stating they still considered the settlement theirs. Spain did likewise with their (previously French) settlement a few years later In the early 1800's a guy basically established himself on the islands , but he actually managed to get backing both from the Republic of Buenos Aires and Great Britain.. Then the US got involved (just to add to the general mess). The Argentines sent someone to run the place, but he was killed in a mutiny after a short time there. Then an Irishman arrived to increase the whole British Flag there, and they actually worked in conjunction with some of the Argentines who were settled in the area. With one of those historical twists, someone murderd a bunch of high ranking Argentines, and a lot of them left, leaving the British there. From then on, it pretty was left as it was as a British Naval Station, until the mid 1800's when it was turned into a "proper" colony settlement. Stroll on to the creation of the UN, and the Argentines decided they wanted the islands and pressed their claim, but the fact that all the islanders wanted to remain British saw that claim fall through. Jump to 1980's and the ruling junta decided to distract the populace by having an "quick, easy war". Nuff said. Then big deposits of oil were discovered a decade or so on.. and it's suddenly become another big thing.

Heh, did you see the bit about the father who hacked his daughters version of Donkey Kong, so it's now Pauline who rescues Mario?

So yes, a couple of days ago the Falkland Islands held a referendum over whether they should remain a British territory. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21750909 In which, only three people voted "no". Of course, the Argentine's are basically saying that the vote doesn't matter, and regardless of how the islanders feel, the islands should still be given to Argentina. What might add some interest to the matters is the new Pope, who , while a Cardinal, made quite a few public comments about "British usurpers/invaders" on the islands and was apparently quite vigerous about how the Argentine soldiers who died during the Falkland War need to be remembered, honoured, and (depending on how you take his tone of delivery) possibly given vengeance. While I'm all for honouring fallen soldiers who did their duty, I tend to think you give up the ability to claim vengeance when you actually are the ones who invaded in the first place.... Still, as a lawyer friend of mine noted: "It is essential to Argentina's argument that it rejects (a) the right to self-determination, (b) domiciled jurisdiction and © any statute of limitations. If these three principles are accepted Argentina has no claim. If they are rejected Argentina has no right to exist!"

Between assorted wakeups in the night and something setting the dogs barking early in the morning.. I think I got about 3 or 4 hours of sleep. I'm not sure if I'm actually awake now.

It's amazing how what should be simple home repair jobs turn into hours of back and forth. Fixing a broken diaphragm on a toilet flush and it ends up rolling into a whole bunch of things, finding eroding rubber seals, back and forth to get parts, find the right tools, ..

Well I know Kai Leng had all sorts of history as Cerberus Bad Boy Assassin in the books, and I think one of those comic runs. But if you didn't have any of that backstory.. I mean be serious, he looks like a campy Nightwing, he gets stopped from assassinating one target by a terminally ill former assassin with breathing troubles, then runs away from his other targets because Shepard got there first, he gets his ass kicked on Thessia until a gunship uses missiles to blow the floor from under your feet, and THEN he crows about how skilled he is?