Orogun01

Didn't know we had so many supporters of porn here Okay, the problem is not with having porn on your phone is that you usually take your phone with you to public places. I don't care what people do on the privacy of their homes but I don't want to dine next to a guy that's watching nasty schoolgirls spank each others buttocks. Sure there are public places that are away from the public's eye, but if someone needs to get up and interrupt their business because they need to look to porn in their phones on the bathroom I would say that's an addiction. Plus is a bad idea; you know that phone is going to pass through hands. Do you really want people asking, what does this app do? and then you have to tell them about the birds and bees and why some birds like to be gagged and tied.

Quite frankly if someone needs to have porn on their phone they should find help; either psychiatric or treatments for sore elbows. So Apple is doing a good thing really.

You're a parent. It's like dead baby jokes - they stop being funny once you have a kid. They were once funny?! and i'm not even a father.

He got scared, which is what the aggressor should had felt when he saw a gun on his face. Instead he assaulted and during the struggle shots were discharged. I know that I wouldn't venture a walk through the streets without a group of friends or a gun, precisely because of people like Ed DiDonato and the worse.

You know, usually when it comes to censorship i'm adamant to fight it but in this case I have to agree with Apple. People have always found a way to hack the Iphone and run programs on it; namely porn. But I really don't want to go to the App store and find smut. Plus is their product they have a right to monopolize it's content.

Saw it and all I gotta criticize is that: IT NEEDS MORE COWBELL!!

Try some Indian news, they probly pissed by all the bombs on the border.

I'd like to hire Samus as a babysitter, then I could pull a Jude Law

What kind of person would GoW would be? Definitely not one I would leave with children.

Seems like the world's most naive project or the greatest con.

Huh, I thought the "devil" and the "beast" were one in the same. If the devil has yet to be thrown into the lake of burning sulfur (because Revelations hasnt happened yet) then who/what is the "beast". Also, who is the "false prophet"? The false prophet is the Antichrist and I can't believe you haven't heard of the beast! 666, Iron Maiden, ring a bell? Anyway, the Beast has many interpretations many link it to different religious organizations, such as the Roman church and the papacy. Oh and you aren't wrong the devil is the beast (dragon) is just that the bible has metaphorical beasts by the thousands.

Actually most mystics would vehemently forbid it, since mind altering substances turn you away form the true path to enlightenment. Or so i'm told. But this is going from a theological discussion to a hippiefest, let's go back to the Devil. Drawing comparison from other cultures, it seems that the "tempting of Christ" and the whole antagonistic relationship is parallel to Buddha conquering Mara and reaching enlightenment. Except that this was 6 centuries BC, nonetheless temptation and sin (and the Devil who embodies them) are associated with physical needs. Buddhism prominently is an attempt to gain control of the "self" in order to reach nirvana. Which means that the biggest obstacles are of physical nature. Another parallel here; the gnostic text feature the same message, of Christ being the son of man and the true Messiah being trapped inside the body of flesh. During Christ's times Satan hadn't been elevated to the position of King of Hell and could well be just an embodiment of the Temptations that Christ had to face. It was later through the popularization of Christianity that Satan went from temptation to King of Hell (kudos to his PR department) Is through this that evil gets a face and the archetype of the DemonKing is born.

Same. My first guess was pornstar-- really, look at that name! Well, I do remember some stories about the fact that.. uhm.. he was well-endowed... but no, that wasn't his profession. He was a damn' good artist, and that's coming from someone who's never been a fan of Type O Negative. R.I.P. Pete, the musical scene will miss you very much. I'm pretty sure he actually posed for Playgirl. And all the goth girls swooned. The thing that really separated Type O Negative from all the other doom n' gloom black metal bands out there was the sly wit and black humor of their lyrics. Listen to "Everyone I Love Is Dead" or "Unsuccessfully Coping with the Natural Beauty of Infidelity" for examples. If it weren't for that, I'd probably never have given them the time of day, as I'm not a huge fan of the genre. Oh, and their cover of "Cinnamon Girl" was pretty righteous. This. His sense of humor is what made Type o' Negative is special, considering the genre that they played. True, his was the only 90's goth that didn't suck.

May he rest in pieces.

I don't wish to be rude, but that's balls. I had a friend at university who thought he saw God, then the next day he saw Jesus and Jesus told him to straighten out his life. In both cases the subject had drunk upwards of eight strong lagers and smoked three 'buckets' of marijuana. that's not a religious experience, it's a drug induced experience. You said it yourself, it nor religious is drug induced. BTW, Jesus gave your friend some good advice.

Saw Armored. . . and I regret it. Like the great Roger Ebert would say:" I wouldn't eat this movie if it was a sandwich"

Most interesting case. I would theorize that they might have been some damage to her long term memory whose functions were replaced by the short term memory. In any way an encephalogram should reveal more.

And you have gone completely off point.

"Shouldn't" as in future tense. Really, you gotta stop that misquoting thing. Just because they use the same media doesn't mean that they are the same industry. There is a great amount of degrees of separation between the porn industry and the movie industry. There is an even greater amount of separation (the Pacific ocean) between games and game porn. I would find it unreasonable to judge the whole of movies to be bad due to porn; which is exactly what media outlets do to games in the name of sensationalism. That division between games and pornographic games should be made clearer.

The mystical experience can't be denied nor confirmed, only known personally.

But ACT were pushing an unreasonable date, not only they would have to scratch a lot of ideas that might have gone into the game but also release a buggy game, hence the multiplayer.

Slight misunderstanding due to my wording. I mean to say not that they are not movies but that they are not serious films worthy of consideration, most people make that distinction. I never said that Rapelay wasn't a game, it's a pornographic game. What I ask that division between pornography and serious games that exist in the film industry. I also noticed that your post didn't actually addressed the point and is full of fallacies.

Really!? When was the last time a porn movie or porn actor won an Oscar? The XXX category was even left entirely to pornography just to make a distinction between serious films and smut. Maybe there are filmmakers that like to blur that line, but amongst that community saying that a porn is a serious film genre will earn you some looks. Is it really too much to ask that the same is done for video games?

I'm outraged because bull like this shouldn't be called a game. Most people make a distinction between pornographic material and movies; Is it so hard for CNN to do the same?

But they aren't the guys at troika. Plus is hard to work when you aren't allowed in the premises and is actually ACT responsibility to fix them. Okay I guess this just something that will come up on the trial, but I doubt that they would even mention it unless they can bring it up in court. Well we will have to see that on court.