It's useless and pointless to even try to have an intelligent and interesting debate with someone who never backs up his nonsense with anything AND refutes every single link/proof/report with disdain and baseless mockery. Let me sum up your posts so far in the thread as a shining example.
What reports? Link? Proof? Something? No?
---
Fact? Are you using the word "fact"? Hilarious. But please, feel free to prove me wrong. Just as I have, many times, by providing links when you've spouted your right wing nonsense.
---
Love it when you claim even the Nobel Prize committee have an agenda.. Or that they don't know what they're doing.. Because taks knows better. This actually makes me laugh in real life. Boy, your inner picture of yourself would be so much fun to see. TOTAL lack of self insight.
Myth? On what grounds? None? OK THEN! Please claim more BS the next time, this post was way too short to even bother with.
Really? Which agenda? Trying to overturn the US finances for..? Are they terrorists?? SHOULD YOU BOMB THEM?! Feel free to explain your insanity. Also, which pseudo-scientists? And please show some scientists who are MUCH BETTER than all these "alarmists" (as you used to call them)?
---
Again: really? Taken from what studies? Feel free to link something that backs up this OBVIOUS BS.
---
So nuclear energy is safe energy? Where do you get this "fact" from? That huge piece of fat you're sitting on? OK. If you feel you have better sources, please provide.
Blah blah blah, you keep reciting your Fox news (or wherever you get your BS from) over and over and over. None of this is worth anything to anyone but you since you DON'T BACK ANYTHING UP, EVER. Is that really so hard to understand?
Most scientists? How do you know? Where did you get that "fact"? How do you know it's a myth? Why are glaciers disappearing? Do you actually know anything?
---
An activist ploy? And you base this "fact" on what? Feel free to provide any type of evidence, proof or even.. WIKIPEDIA LINKS. You know.. you usually ridicule people who use Wikipedia as a basis for their knowledge. Do you know how stupid that looks from someone who bases his knowledge on Fox or right wing propaganda or, in your case so far, NOTHING? I guess you don't.
---
"Many scientists".. Don't you ever get sick of yourself and your baseless claims? Provide names, provide links to your research, provide backup. Anything.
What the hell is a dolt? And I keep telling you that we (Sweden) have been a socialist country for a hundred years and we're one of the strongest nations in all categories measurable, yes even economically. But feel free to provide proof of this utterly ridiculous statement. One thing is sure though: You can't. That's why it makes you look really, really.. uninformed.
Or will it be like that time when you claimed that the US has the best healthcare in the world and I provided a report that said it wasn't.. and your only response was "That report sucks and I know better"..? That was pretty funny too.
No, I'm sure every real scientist in the world is wrong because of those billions of credits of statistics you read in a university (or was it one of those distance courses you can buy over the Internet?).. But feel free to find something that backs up your claim that everything that's going on right now is a natural cycle. Feel free to overwhelm us with your knowledge that only you can understand, and not mere mortals as I (who've only read 10 credits of university statistics).
And this is where your understanding of the numbers end and your right wing agenda takes over. Anyone who's ever read statistics know that you will not ever find proof in the numbers, only tendencies. What does the numbers point to? Noone knows for sure. Do we have enough knowledge to make a reliable analysis? No. So why do we bother? Because we don't have 650,000 years to check if the numbers are true. With the limited science we have today we've measured that we're indeed warming the planet. If we're wrong and still try to stop it, we lose some money. Big f-ing deal. If we're right and we don't try to stop it? Do we really want to find out what happens then? Is it possible to comprehend that notion through your Fox-washed mind?
Yes, because we should all sit here and watch this forum all the time so WE can PROVE stuff for you, the one person on this forum who still hasn't figured out how the LINK function works..
Really? Proof? Links? Reports?
---
Sure, I'll do that. Right after you've proved that it ISN'T CO2 that's causing it. Deal?
---
So you want us to believe YOU instead of news or "Forskning och Framsteg" ( http://www.fof.se/ ) or scientific reports?
PS. Excuse the "unorthodox" quoting mechanic I used. The board complained about too many quotes or something so I had to condense it