Malcador

Got into that Witcher Adventure game beta, so that'll be something new.

Still a bit concerned by Ebola, last I heard it's still not checked in the African countries. Good fortune that it didn't seem to spread in the US.

Sounds like there's not much pretending to it being a "war" (really every Internet argument is).

Well trouble will ensue if you do, so yes, you are avoiding trouble. And if a customer's being racist you should call them out on it, not let it slide.

No, that's pretty much convenience for you - you avoid trouble at work. Expected though.

The dream sequences were awesome, moved me to go get a glass of water. Probably could have done Shepard suddenly getting PTSD by having the kid pop up during action or something else than some Clint Mansell aided forest trip.

Come now, that's not being truly for social justice where you shut up and accept it just for the sake of convenience. As for me, pretty much the same online as offline in terms of approach to things and demeanor.

Much like most issues SJWs rant about online, heh.

I think if killed by a woman these people are denied their virgins in heaven

ISIS is the new Hitler.

Well not that hit piece, meant Gamergate itself. Rather entertaining watching all of this, and best of all, there's no real downside to the ending. Well maybe more self-pleasuring be people on Twitter.

It is rather great isn't it ?

Well, too bad for you, I guess ?

http://www.gog.com/news/mutator_promo New gimmick sale - buy and get random games for $2.00

Well, don't see why not. Then a drama would ensue about how they are not as good as male players.

Amused coworkers by following up with "Are you finished?" after a client went on an angry rant, not even all that on topic. Ah, Mondays.

Ah, it got a chuckle out of me. True, but it wouldn't be childish. If I was in charge of a website like RPS and I really had an issue with someone I probably wouldn't post anything about there games. But it would have to be an issue around something serious, like if the company was homophobic. Its optional what content these websites post It would be, you don't cover a game because you think one of the developers there is not "in line" although your audience may care about the game and that's just juvenile. Not that this is the case here as the 'omission' here is most likely unintended.

True, but it wouldn't be childish. If I was in charge of a website like RPS and I really had an issue with someone I probably wouldn't post anything about there games. But it would have to be an issue around something serious, like if the company was homophobic. Its optional what content these websites post Indeed, it's like a sponsor deciding to stop paying.

Not entirely unbelievable, you kind aren't above high school nonsense like that.

Oby makes this look too easy. But then again that may be due to the audience.

Is a possible reason, he has been fairly outspoken. Probably it is just a gap in coverage.

Might be better to use a chair there.

What a hell that would be.

Seems like the ones they have over here are the exact opposite, but I rather enjoy being around angry and jaded folks.