Malcador

They are considering it as your source says. Flag itself might be harmless but who knows the context of it. From my limited observations, some people who fly that and act like some sort of uber patriot revolutionary badass always seem to be the type to say sand **** or hate the darkies. Posting on mobile is hard

I like volleyball, football and swimming. God dann I hate some of these Canadian commentators

4000 for a semester? Not too bad. I think we are above 10k for engineering these days. Was funny to see students waste their aid money on beer, though

Anger is a drug.

Such amazing comments on that. I do lile the one claiming Trump was ready to fight the protester that rushed his stage.

Yup. Is fun on non air conditioned streetcars with people unaware of the cleaning power of soap.

Yeah, that one is nasty - with two separate hostages or groups under the gun and one with a timer. I've failed at that one at least a dozen times already but I'm going to give it another go. I think I have it figured out - FINALLY. I had to wait until I got some suppressed weapons and did it with pointmen. Wish I could just do it Russian style and storm the place and who lives lives

Both do actually.

http://www.pcgamer.com/augs-lives-matter-banner-in-new-deus-ex-concept-art-draws-criticism/ Eidos likes winding people up.

WoW, making a push on my 9th lvl 100 (ok, one boost to 100, two to 90 and 1 to 58). Am 97.4 and still in Talador, huzzah. Door kickers is great. I still hate that embassy mission though.

Those shoes can not be comfortable

Yep. Varying degrees of worth.

Trump certainly needs to learn to not saying stupid things.

I'm banned everywhere else.

Toyota supports ISIS I hear.

Not sure that latter group bothers with small steps after so many years. Also I like the Flyers logo there, this was obviously taken by a Penguins fan.

Sat out on front step with my dog, took what I think is a very good photo of him. High point of today

Pretty far way to go, if so.

And if they work for NSA- whose purpose is to subvert others/ protect US communications/ internet etc- then you'd be right to since their technical security is very good, and has to be very good. If on the other hand they work for Hillary Rodham Clinton or the DNC chances are they're grossly incompetent (but not grossly negligent) rather than elite and their security is very very bad to the extent it barely exists for the former case. Technically, Bush withdrew from the ABM rather than outright abrogated it. Whether that has any effect on the legitimacy of a President doing it by fiat rather than via senate I have no idea, but he didn't simply tear the agreement up one day and tell the Russians to suck it. He activated the withdrawal clause, withdrew after its notice period, then told the Russians to suck it. Not necessarily. Sysadmin doesn't necessitate development, could though. Outside of things with NSA, headlines on Snowden says... are still funny. I wonder how much money his new phone case will make though.

Really? I work with a bunch of lecherous 50 year olds. Tiresome to hear how hot the coffee shop girl is. I mean it is true, but come on.

Well patch either made the Eldar not moronic or I got lucky. Onward with the campaign!

Better go tell my sysadmin buddies how elite they really are.

Hilarious. Snowden actually commented and stated that if Russia were responsible, the US government would know and it wouldn't be "speculation," suggesting (big surprise) Russia isn't behind this. Trump believing the very media rigged in Hillary's favor is priceless though. An aside, but the faith in Snowden's anything is sort of funny. Please explain what reason anyone has to distrust anything said by Snowden. The man got in trouble because he showed integrity and transparency when the government did not. Well for example your example from him. Also for some, granted the scum on reddit, he is like a god when it comes to anything on security yet Scheier is a nobody. Not quite sure he has shown transparency. Mostly as what does he have to be transparent about. Whether you agree or disagree with his actions does not give cause for not trusting him at his word. You've not named an example not to trust him beyond "when he was entrusted with withholding information that the American public knew nothing of and would be upset about if they knew, he told them." That? That's a very particular type of trust that was broken, and by no means representative of a bold-faced liar. In other news, Jane Sanders gives great insight to what she and Bernie were aiming for and thinking as they endorsed Hillary. Not quite sure I need a reason to 'not' trust anyone. But as I've mentioned already, it's him being treated as an authority on things I'm not quite sure he is due.

I dunno. I feel the need for that just from meeting one. Anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.

Dealing with retarded ally AI in BFG. Gave up on that mission.