Bartimaeus

Well...yeah, besides winning, no, it wasn't a great day. Packers' RT is gonna be out for more like 4-6 weeks than just one, Cobb is pretty beat up, Davante Adams got pretty beat up, Lacy is hurt (possibly sprained an ankle: no official word yet), Boyd got hurt, Nelson is still out for the season... But hey, the Seahawks start out 0-2, and the Packers start out 2-0. I mean...heck, that's pretty great. Oh yeah, and so many flags. Seriously...I saw SO MANY flags today.

TODAY WAS A GREAT DAY. Except for the Cowboys having lost Romo in addition to Bryant now as well as Witten spraining both his ankles. Sorry about that, Cowboy fans. Otherwise, Raiders hilariously beat the Ravens, Jaguars hilariously beat the Dolphins, and Packers won by 10, ruining the Seahawks' record right before they could beat the previous the previous holders'.

Why do the Packers get a major offensive injury every time we play the Seahawks? Yeesh. RT, Bryan Baluga, out this week with an MCL sprain.

Yeah, I'm getting a ridiculous amount of pressure to see him by my family before the surgery...but it's like...I'm not seeing him because I WANT him to see him again...just after the surgery actually happens. And I absolutely don't want to endanger anyone else there. So if things go wrong...well, that's that. They could've gone horribly wrong already: that's life. Thanks for the blessings. That's rough that nobody told you anything. My mom had that happen to her with her grandma...her health had been failing for months, but she only got the news after it was already too late to see her again. Just seems so inconsiderate...but in reality, most of the time, people are just more concerned with the person actually dying than the feelings of others who want to see them for one last time. Sucks...but that's how it goes, I guess.

My condolences as well, Azdeus. My grandpa is in for heart surgery on Monday, and they have to stop his heart for a short while while they do the procedure, and there's always the chance of him not waking up...so I'd like to see him before that, but I have the flu, and there's no way I'm taking the chance of bringing the flu into a VA clinic and possibly killing a bunch of old veterans. Praying everything turns out for the best...

It might be wise to spoiler that and put the text ABOVE it, not below it. Some people are rather squeamish about these things.

mfw the broncos actually win (and without even going into overtime)

It may be because I am an immeasurably huge prude, but I'd rather see it be made illegal (or socially unacceptable, depending on the legality of your locale) for men to do the same than for women to get the right. If we're striving for equality, let's make not seeing people's disgustingly unclad bodies equal for both genders, I say. ...but hardly anybody seems to want that, so little chance of it happening, it seems.

As far as I know, it's pretty normal for stuff like that to not be perfectly symmetrical. My ribs are also slightly misaligned, with one rib in particular jutting out a bit more than the one on the other side does...and it's been that way for quite some time, as far as I can remember. ...Hey, let me know if I should also go to the doctor, O.K.? If stuff like that actually has a high tendency for like tumors or something, RIP myself, as I probably have some late stage cancer or something that I'll discover soon, . No, seriously, do let us know what happens. lol

This reminds me very much of the claim that the (Eastern) Roman Empire was actually called the Byzantine Empire in the time of the Empire...that the Romans started calling themselves "Byzantines" at some point...even though there is zero text that was written during the actual time of the Roman Empire that suggests such, and though modern translations of older works do often have the translator change "Roman" to "Byzantine", deliberate mistranslations for the sake of readability for modern audiences does not make the Empire Byzantine still. Some people will nevertheless argue until they're blue in the face that it was indeed the Byzantine Empire. A pox upon such miscreants and all that.

His father didn't even have the support to pull off winning the primary!

So...to recap for the Corps: 3 Divisions 18 Regiments 72 Batallions 360 Companies 1440 Platoons 4320 Squads 17280 Marines (plus whatever the reserve adds) So...not much illumination as to what she meant when she said "brigade".

http://www.thedrawplay.com/comic/draftkings-and-fanduel-need-to-jump-off-a-bridge/

From what I'm reading about Ibrahim, his work is almost entirely lost, and only exists in small excerpts referenced by later works. Do you have any specific proof that we can see that suggests what you're saying?

I am not really sure what you mean their ?

And your name is Darth...what was it again?

Only after I already send or submit something and realize I need to correct it in a half-dozen ways.

Very funny

Nope, that was just me...for some reason, I thought *you* wrote the bold part of the post that you quoted, and were saying that you should keep the apostrophe in that case. Whoops!

I'm confused, 213374U: your two examples remove the apostrophe in both cases, regardless of the periods.

Yeah, I don't know why it's become a thing to put apostrophes in plural forms of words, but become a thing it has. Do you have a source on the apostrophe for a single character word? Never heard that before, and I'm curious as to whether that's actually correct.

Yes...Germany and France's shared heritage goes back at least as far as the Carolingian Empire, IIRC. That's why (at least) both share the general term "Franks", from what I remember. If you want to make the argument that the concept of nationality as we know it today was little to nonexistent back then, and therefore almost all nations have trouble tracing their heritage back very far (with maybe a few exceptions), well...I can accept that more readily than just the argument against Germany, so fine.

Again, I don't necessarily disagree with you. Most people around here have been relatively tame...besides maybe a few (...regardless of what side they're on), so I'm not really so concerned about that.

This entire thing stinks of slimy politics. Dig up everything a person has ever been involved with, latch onto anything juicy sounding regardless of the actual evidence (note: I'm not actually necessarily placing a value on the evidence in this specific case - just that it hasn't really mattered for these controversies), regardless of what it's about or how it relates to their job or cause or anything else, and demonize them and make sure that everyone will know them for that controversy for the rest of their lives. It's what politics has devolved to, and it's what GG and anti-GG have been doing to each other for some time now, it feels like. It's why even though I lean towards the ideals of GG, I'm never gonna get personally involved with this crap or definitively support anyone involved either way. When something becomes as dirty and flagrantly stupid as politics have become, nobody wins.

Of course not. But the issue with her character has very little to do with actual GamerGate, and everything to do with...just that: her character. So why does it seem like GamerGate is acting like she's the Devil incarnate and that the entire anti-GG movement is lesser because of it? Isn't that exactly what anti-GG has done to GG when there have been less than savory individuals involved with GG...like that guy from just a few days ago that was pretending to be anti-GG, and was instructing people how to make bombs or whatever? Why are we still involved in this kind of nonsense? Express your disgust with the person as it relates to *that* actual issue (instead of something completely unrelated, i.e. GG), and the people whom are defending her, and move on.