Bartimaeus

Sure. Given that you've reformatted at least once already, it almost certainly has to be a hardware problem, anyhow. You can try switching SATA ports, but you should also try a memtest with memtest86, as well. However, given what you said about needing to boot into safe mode first before being able to boot back into non-safe mode, it does sound like the problem(s) may lean towards other things, such as your hard drive. Switching SATA ports can't hurt.

That's an unusual faulting application, I think. The faulting module isn't of much use, either. Only thing I can really find that may help is if you open up a command prompt (if you don't know what that is, open up a run prompt via Windows Key + R, type in cmd and then run it), typing sfc /scannow, which should correct corrupt files relevant to that error...but I'm not really expecting that to work, and after that it seems like a wash. There's nothing else?

Look in Windows Logs, in both Application and System. Check the entries during the time you were not using the computer (i.e. when the system hanged), particularly for the error level events, and see if any of it illuminates you on what the problem might be.

The only reason I played that video is because (a little freaky-looking) Anna from Frozen was in the thumbnail image. They got me.

It is, actually...since the question is coming from you, someone who clearly doesn't have much interest in the civilized discourse that most of us take part of for our own enjoyment in our free time. There's more to communication (and whether or not it's worth bothering continuing with) than just the one factor: one only has to look at the other pariahs of our little community to determine that.

System of a Down - Chop Suey clip at about 49 is remarkably spot on, IMO. The other songs are probably good, too, but I don't know them (not really being a metal/rock person). Most of his covers for other genres are at least pretty decent, too. (e): Funnily enough, me and my friend were looking for terrible Let It Go covers to listen to for kicks, and we found a metal cover of it by him, which is pretty good in itself (although really silly, ).

If the only thing around here that you could discuss were Obsidian games, I would've been long gone years ago.

I thought the argument was that laws against gay marriage broke other laws, not that they were necessarily "unjust" (...as much as their ruling may feel like a consequence of the latter instead of the former). I mean, I guess technically, that's a form of injustice, but not really in the traditional sense.

How about the opposite: putting, way, way too much on? My sister did it once, and put literally about 3-4 grams out of a 10 gram tube. The stuff was everywhere. Also, sadly, I know for a fact other people have not put thermal paste on...so even there, you're not the only one.

After three passes? Though any amount of errors means it's bad and should be replaced, for a system that was consistently crashing, that's a little less than I was expecting. Did you try to boot up the system with your flash drive with only one stick of RAM in (and then the other if it crashed with the first)?

That sounds bad. Have you tried swapping out CPU (seeing as it's the only new part of your build) and/or RAM? I'd suggest trying to run a memory test with memtest86: should try to confirm there's no problem with the RAM, since your symptoms sound like it could also possibly be a problem.

So, from what I can tell, it sounds like HDD failures. All your symptoms, including GPU driver failure and intermittent restarts, sounds like it starts from there. It does seem pretty unusual that both your drives are failing at the same time, though: not sure what to make of that. I would want to stick in an old HDD (like an 80GB or something) if you have one (or a flash drive, if you don't) that's been formatted and see how the system handles from then on, personally, since it does seem suspicious for both of them to go bad at the same time. I'd also think a failure on the motherboard's part that's killing your HDDs would be catastrophic enough that your system simply wouldn't work at all (if such a thing's even possible), but it's impossible to definitively say.

And Jordy Nelson tears his ACL in pre-season. I spoke too soon. (e): And Aaron Rodgers currently has his throwing arm wrapped up, our first round pick Demarious Randall was carted off the field, TJ Lang is being evaluated for a concussion...

I like preseason, actually (...sans pointless injuries). But there's not too much to talk about.

I'm going to go a little against the grain here(?): how is paying heed to whom you are and are not attracted to being shallow? If you are not attracted to someone, you are not attracted to someone - it doesn't matter what traits that are specifically turning you away, whether it be gender/sex, physical features, how they manage their appearance, what they believe (yes, even stuff like this can play into your perception of who you're attracted to), etc. - you are simply not attracted to them. I also doubt it's a wise idea to pursue those whom you are not attracted to - that would surely result in some difficulties in any potentially meaningful relationship for as long as it remains true (it may not remain true, since what we appreciate can change over time, especially with more exposure - particularly if it's in a consistently positive light - but it's impossible to determine that from the outset, and most people would simply rather be with someone where both parties feel like they are compatible with one another to begin with). On the other hand, the girl also asked, "would you have still felt a connection to me[...]?". This one I am less sure of, since it depends on exactly what is meant by "feeling a connection": if you have trouble making friends and/or just in general getting along with someone because of such factors, I think that may be more shallow (it really kind of depends: some people find it impossible to associate with people with opposite political beliefs, for example...whereas I don't have such problems except for very extreme cases. But I wouldn't classify those who do as being shallow: should I? Are physical appearances really that much more meaningful than political beliefs when it comes to personal relationships with others? That's not a rhetorical question: I'm genuinely unsure of what/how you classify such factors as "meaningful".) But genuine attraction? You can't really control for that.

That's the next thing I would like after friends list-specific privacy settings: games list-specific privacy settings. It'd be nice if there were just options/customization for everything...knowing Valve, it'll be another ten to twenty years...or more likely, never.

Yeah, most people I know set their profiles to at least friends only...unless they have a specific reason for keeping it completely public. No way to tell how many people that actually is, though. I personally keep my profile completely private...and I'll continue to do so until they implement friends list-specific privacy controls.

How do you guys get such high percentages for multiple parties? Do I just agree with no-one on some things?

Huge walls of text aren't very conductive to discussion to begin with, though... Resort to it if necessary, but otherwise have a little restraint and don't drill in every single point and tidbit of supporting information you can possibly think of/bring up all at once. Nobody wants to read those kinds of posts.

So your best party is my worst party...interesting. Good to know: I'll know who to whack first when the apocalypse comes.

Great. Just great: not only am I in between all parties in the U.S., the same is true for the parties in Canada!

Hey, I never really had anything in common with hardly anybody here to begin with: it's no big deal.

Given at least a few months, no version of Windows thus far has been able to identify genuine versions of Windows vs. non-genuine versions of Windows when the latter is properly set up. I can't imagine that changing any time soon, really, but we'll see.

If you're talking one on one with somebody, it can happen. In open discussions, though, it does generally seem to be eternally fruitless to try to convince the person you're actually arguing with...however, I think that's because somebody who decides to engage with you already has cemented their stance: why else would they feel the need to go out of their way to argue with you (unless they're simply playing devil's advocate)? Vice versa if you do the same for them, too, of course. On the other hand, your arguments may help guide others who are not actively involved in the discussion one way or another: I know for a fact that merely listening to other people discuss on these forums in certain topics and seeing what're the best arguments people can come up with are has helped sway me at least a little towards one side or another. Unfortunately, for this to actually be any legitimate good for figuring out your own stance, this also relies on both sides being equal in terms of arguing ability, which, as I'm sure some of us have noticed/felt by now in regards to certain members and discussions here, is often simply not true.