I know you find it hard to comprehend even simple ideas, but I'll keep trying anyway: science doesn't know yet (string theory is promising, but so much time has passed it's possible we'll never know). That doesn't mean it was god.
I know you find faith hard to understand, and you take comfort in science since you think that there won't be a god in control, that people are.
Can you please stop posting in this thread?
Ignore me.
He might have been manipulated into accepting a harmful belief, but he, himself, is not necessarily evil.
Ignorant and doing evil acts, sure.
And yet, you'll argue that a war on forign soil is acceptable in cirtain circumstances. You claim peace and love, but look at the attitudes you showed towards china, you're hardly offering them an olive branch and whatever claims you have that 'they started it' are rended somewhat dubious by 'your' failure to stop it from happening in the first place.
After all, if actions are evil, inaction that leads to the same result can be just as evil, and by your own account, intention or even knowledge is no excuse.
The point isn't weather ANYTHING is good or evil, the point is that they're both just labels that we give to things based on our own experiences and morals. They can't be absolute or else everyone would agree with them.
Look at the old testiment, god purged the world full of sin of all its life, and yet, would it have only taken one good person killed in the flood to make the entire act 'evil'?
Good point about "everyone else would agree with them" Earth is made for conflict and conflict is made for Earth, without it, a sudden stop, might shatter the world in shock (for 13 years of war; 1 year of peace worldwide, since recorded time, approx rounded off). Also know that "I" have little power. So some of your arguements are moot. I suppose you mean the USA?
NightandtheShape: Go ahead and disagree! Once, again, there is no fact, proof, or evidence of god, ONLY belief through faith. Also: