Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Obsidian Forum Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Hell Kitty

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hell Kitty

  1. Heh, I actually like messing about for ages making my character*, but genre is irrelevant. Mass Effect, The Sims 2, Saint's Row, it's all good. It's a nice feature, but it really doesn't make a game more of an rpg. Same with the name really. They could do an ME and allow you to choose your first name, but you'd only ever see it on save games and status screens, with NPCs saying Agent, Agent Doe, or just Doe, or some such. I like fluff, but I don't really miss it when it's not there. * I also like inventory tetris.
  2. I just want an announcement of some sort. JE Sawyer gives birth to Avellone's love child. It's all good.
  3. If I could live forever I would hot wire a Porsche and use it to stalk Tale who goes to all the cool places and make a coat out of Nick i am's skin and teach Uwe Boll how to make movies.
  4. I have a pair just like that.
  5. I love you, alanschu.
  6. Exactly what about what I posted is not true at all? We aren't driven by our need for food and shelter and sex? We don't compete for these things differently now than we have in the past? The laws and punishments of society don't have any influence on how we act? You can't ignore reality just because it doesn't fit into your pessimistic world view. I never said we were angels. This seems to be your entire problem, the apparent belief that civilization and evolution means some form of perfection. Civilization doesn't mean we don't sometimes act uncivilized. Also, it isn't true that human kill for no reason. There is always a reason. That reason might not be obvious, it might seem stupid, you might not be able to understand it, but there's always a reason.
  7. Next thing you'll be telling us is that the sky is blue. This is all wrong. Both eating and breeding are necessary for survival (though the latter isn't necessary for the survival of the individual) and directly comparable because they are things we are willing to fight for. You speak of our "basic instincts" as though they are some kind of urge we must find the will to suppress, which is nonsense. Food, shelter, sex - what drives and will always drive the human animal, what makes us human, and mankind will always be willing to fight for them if necessary. Where once we might have relied solely on violence by killing our neighbor, stealing his cave and his food, and taking his woman against her will, now we compete with our peers for a promotion so we can can buy the best clothes and cars and home, eat at the best restaurants and attract the best mate. We still fight, we will always fight, but thanks to the social, cultural, and technological advances of our civilization how we fight has changed. The laws and punishments that come with being a part of a civilized society mean that resorting to violence is no longer the winning formula it once might have been.
  8. We aren't trying, we simply are more civilized. Changes in society and culture and technology prove this. That's what civilization is. It doesn't stop us from being human, and that we can act selfishly, of stupidly or violently doesn't mean humanity as a whole isn't more civilized now than in the past. We don't "cave in" to our basic instincts. Choosing to eat when I'm hungry is not "caving in". Do I need to refuse to eat in order to be seen as civilized?
  9. I agree with everything Hurlshot posted. Has anyone played the demo of JAZZ, the game formerly known as JA3 (or JA3D or whatever)?
  10. Stargate? Realistic? Those two words don't go together.
  11. If he didn't have access to a gun he would have just used some other object, like an axe or a spoon or something. Random object massacres happen all the time it's just that the liberal media doesn't do reports on them.
  12. Oh go on, you know you want to.
  13. Hey, where did my post about Dexter go? Anyway, I've watched all of Season 2 and I'm not really sure how I feel about the character now. I really looking forward to season 3, provided it avoids the craptitude of the latest novel.
  14. So you can imagine actions being performed even when they aren't shown, they happen instantly, but you can't imagine near misses? You can't imagine a complete and full health regen over a period of seconds but you can imagine a complete and full health regen as soon as you touch a health kit? It's not a realism issue, it's an immersion one. But that's the thing about immersion, a feature is only immersive if you like it, and when you like it you're more willing to fill in the blanks or imagine things that don't actually occur. Health packs feel real to you, to me both systems feel fake but I don't have an issue with either so they have no effect on immersion for me. As was pointed out earlier these games aren't military simulators, they're playable action movies. My pet hate immersion killer is a hud that tries to give an in-game reason for it's existence. The ui exists to give me, the player, information, it doesn't need to exist for the character. I prefer my games not try to pretend they aren't games. And you're wrong about your character violently wretching back from being hit big time in 2 & 4. I just loaded them and the screen shakes a bit, but it doesn't feel like more than a flesh wound. I'd like to see something like MGS3, where you needed specific items to heal specific injuries. Of course this would only work in a game in which survival is a major component, not FPS which constantly has you in combat.
  15. Damn straight. I don't get why people accuse businesses of being greedy because heaven forbid they want to make money, especially concerning luxury items, yet fail to see how greedy they are being themselves by accusing the company of taking from them something that was never theirs. When you buy a game you get what's on the disc, you don't earn the right to any and all content they might have made during the production of the game.
  16. Oh I thought you mean it was ripping off a movie or another game. Heh. I don't understand how you think running over a health kit feels more like you are bandaging yourself, but then maybe you're so talented that you can run around shooting people while simultaneously bandaging serious wounds. Do you have four arms? Are you Wolverine? Both systems feel like magic to me. Some dude on another forum had an interesting way to look at a regenerating health system - when the screen turns red or blurs or whatever a particular game does, those are near misses, the only shot that hits is the one that kills you.
  17. I played the demo and agree with everything Tale posted.
  18. You can do that in CoD 1, it's just that the gaping chest wound wouldn't close itself up until you run over a first aid kit. It's not a realism issue, as health that regenerates when running over a box or pressing a button is no more real as health that regenerates automatically after a few seconds, and as such the fact that it's a military shooter is irrelevant. Oh, and what did you mean when you said the US campaign was a complete rip-off? A rip-off of what?
  19. Why do you assume this DLC was content that was originally meant as part of the game but taken away and held back in a greedy attempt at getting more money, and not content that was made specifically as a mini expansion pack?
  20. Why? Whereas the sense of entitlement you have is just peachy.
  21. Season 1 of Dexter, moving on to season 2.
  22. u want 2 dumb down the english language? What if they could coopt something shorter and snappier. Like 'Nat' or something from their own languages. It's hardy dumbing down. It's just making politically correct speech more practically correct. Indian, American Indian or Native American. They're all accepted terms. If you honestly think anything longer than 6 letters (indian) is too much to "force" on people, then you must have a problem with most of the english language. Removing the ive American from Native American is the definition of dumbing down. Changing words so they are shorter and snappier can only lead to this. Being anti-politically correct is as obnoxious as being politically correct.
  23. ....surely this comment should, at least, raise the cynic's eyebrow. Consider my eyebrow raised. I also don't feel any more sorry for this or any other bomber, but then I never bought into the condescending stereotype of folks with downs as being a bunch of angels.
  24. u want 2 dumb down the english language?

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.