Jump to content

Deadly_Nightshade

Members
  • Posts

    5001
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Deadly_Nightshade

  1. It wasn't even close - in fact it was rather bland and badly-done. Meh, if you want graphics go with a PC.
  2. I doubt it. Intel GPUs. Intel CPUs are fine - also, it's AMD and not Radeon.
  3. I'd think that passing on a game would be better than getting a new system just for that one title - and the PS3 is about the last system I would reccomend if one were to do that.
  4. Maybe... If it were done well and I doubt it would be. As long as it's nothing like Morrowind or Oblivion.
  5. I would like another Star Wars game like Knights of the Old Republic II, that is to say one that breaks all the conventions of the genera and says “**** you” to the standard notions of “light” and “dark.” Other than that, and KotOR III, of course, I really don’t want a new Star Wars game at all…
  6. If you've already changed it try refreashing the page - you need to clean your temp files for it to take effect.
  7. Hey, could someone post the "ALPHA PROTOCOL" part for me? I want to make some but think that it would jest be faster to do it myself (no offense ment to those making them).
  8. That bull**** again? Don't they know that the Civil War effectively ended the main backing of the "States' Rights" movement?
  9. Wow... You'll play Oblivion, of all things, but not KotOR II? That's scary...
  10. I was going by the description in the manual, which made them seem more 'high-culture' than all that. They are more "high-culture" if you're going by the pen-and-paper version although some are what Oner says... It takes a bit to get used to - I felt that way my first day or so as well and then everything clicked and now I love the game's combat.
  11. Yes and no. You have to add it but it can be done.
  12. Nope. Too many things are changed, for that. Also, the 1.2 patch is really not that buggy.
  13. Do it. Don't use any of them your first game - after that you can play around with all three, or four -if you count the conpanion mod-, of them until you choose that one you like the best.
  14. I belive that the FADE DRM requires a disc to work as it opperates based on fake "scratches" on the DVD. I do not, however, know if the Steam version has another form of this DRM or if it shipped with only Steam's own DRM (id est Steam).
  15. Really?! Wow... I thought people had learned that those only harm paying customers and turn off those who dislike activation limits...
  16. "D" is right next to "F" so most likely it's a typo.
  17. You'll have to download a cd-crack for one of them, if I remember correctly, as the orrginal was not converted correctly.
  18. I always update the files myself, without the auto-patcher. It's much faster and less error prone.
  19. I agree. When I sell games back, something that is rare seeing as I only have PCs and a Wii -and my little sisters have taken home with them so I don't even have that at the moment-, I take that money and put into a new title. If I could sell back PC games I would get rid of some of the worse ones I have, at the moment I mainly give these away or just put them on a shelf, and be more open to trying games that look like they might, or might not, be ****y. Of course DRM is to blame there, mainly the advent or massive DRM systems such as Steam and SecuROM on-line activations - both items that efectively kill the secound-hand market (excluding deals between freinds who know there are no problems with the activation).
  20. I seem to remember that there was an issue with newer ATI drivers so you might want to look into that, however I remember having a similar issue with an nVidia card -although I cannot remember how I fixed the issue- so that might not be the case.
  21. The security and condition of the computer are two easy, major differences.
  22. I agree. The only time I have ever posted another person's mod without their permission was when it was compleatly unavalable on the internet due to the author's site shutting down - and even then I did not modify the file in any way or try to claim it was my work. What the other poster has done is nothing more than stealing others' work and claiming it is his own - he is a disgrace to all modders and should be treated accourdingly.
  23. Then you should not use thier work in "your" mod. Make your own fix insted of stealing other work without crediting them. No, you make a patch that does not include that contect or you, or someone else, re-make the fix for your mod. See the above comment. And you took contect that was not yours allong with you, making you nothing more than a common thief. Incorrect. Mods often are released with the understanding that they are not to be modified or used without the permission of the author - when this is not the case they are, most likely, released under the Creative Commons "copyright." Unless that is the case you should not presume that you can use the mod without permission. No, you do. Good for you. They, however, do mind. As I said, they want it to be used as released - what you have done is to take their work and fuse it into something else, something that they do not want their work included in. Thus they are, rightly, accusing you of stealing their work.
  24. And many people, like myself, only use Steam when forced to or when there is too good of a deal to pass up. Steam is nothing more than another DRM scam and it should be treated as such. Also, as far as requirering a constant connection, that is pure bull**** and chips. Actualy, that's accourding to the EULA - something that is, at best, a grey issue as far as the law in concered.
×
×
  • Create New...