Blank

Thanks very much then. and in that case it was a good idea to put this as a sticky

hey, i can do that too: ...

Quiet everyone! George W. Bush is about to address us!

-war of the worlds pretty good i guess... the cg stuff was pretty, but it didn't soothe my apetite for a good story. - i read 1984 i picked it up in the "literature" section of the book store, and considering that i didn't have a copy of my own, and that it is highly esteemed by critics, i purchased the book and read it. um, good book.

I am of the opinion that animals do not have souls, but i don't think fruitless killing of animals is okay, since it is: #1 a waste #2 sadistic #3 pointless #4 Pixies, you need to finish your current supermarket hyjinx episode. poor John C. Penny, he had so much potential.

This definitely proved Intelligent Design. i was impressed by the scientific method, which could prove God all along, i knew it! <_<

hmm, thanks. i downloaded the fix. but like the others, i never had any particular problems before for any unexplained reasons.oh well...

hmm, no, but here is a good site i use to get news for it: nwn2news.net

All I know is that I want one. :D Almost badly enough to join the army if they started using them. Almost. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> same here, all of its configurations are teh sveetness, it looks cool, and sounds like it would shoot well and be easy to clean.

I made an account and looked around. some guy took the name i have here and he hasn't been active for a year, but i just added hyphens to the side and there i am. bioboards stink IMO, but at least i got to enter into the free 360 lottery... i have never posted there. no reason to. i post here though, but just because i like you guys :">

Thanks to Pixies, i have a renewed love of those. the ones by Pixies are good.

even if Romans 6:23 was taken out of context (and it is not, maybe you should read it again), here are other verses that say the same basic thing: Romans 5:12 "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--" Deuteronomy 24:16 "Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin." James 1:15 "Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death." 1 Corinthians 15:56 "The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law;" hmm, it doesn't look like you read it then... here's the whole quote: there is no rejoicing there... from now on i will be much more skeptical of your unsupported opinions/statements.

Let's look at world history. What happened with the "new world"? we see claims made, territories staked, everyone wants what everyone else has and wars over it all. countries win and lose stakes, the places eventually become independant. i predict.... that our history will repeat itself.

oh.. it just didn't make sense to me without you saying the next thing in the same sentence: "People question whether what the bible says is accurate, and the meaning of what it says."

it makes sense to me that the authors would wait until Jesus was gone to start writing, since i personally wouldn't want to miss a moment spending time with God incarnate.

... that sentence doesn't make sense, "No one questions whether or not the bible says what it says." thats like saying, "no one questions whether or not the newspaper says what it says". nobody in their right mind should ask that question, since you can solve it for yourself by looking at it with your eyes. Do you mean, "no one questions whether or not what the bible says has not been changed" ? or are you asking us if we live in the matrix or something?

GIVE US MORE!!!!!!!!!!!

you so just made that up

well, it is written into the scripture:

I think Pixies was just trying to tell the people that are comparing the three religion's gods' that they need to be backing up their statements with verses from the textual sources of those religions in order to have credibility about their conclusions. EDIT: ... he responded for himself, but it is basically what i was saying...

is it... that everything is relative from one person to the next, so to argue about the truth is futile? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Close, but not exactly. There is one truth; It was an elephant. However, since everyone was blind, feeling around in differing places and positions. Different ways and form, each man's view is flawed. The truth was there, the men could not see it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ah, i see. so basically the belief that there is an absolute truth, but people can only deal with it relatively.

is it... that everything is relative from one person to the next, so to argue about the truth is futile?

well, poor Carl Martini didn't have a chance to start with, being drunk all the time. his last name makes him prone to be that way.

What if you are blind in thinking he is blind? You are just one of the blind men telling the other blind man he is wrong = ) (i read the link by the way, and it was a good story i guess. but it proves itself as fallible, in that it assumes there is nobody who is "right", or at least that you never know who is "right", and therefore the story may be blind in and of itself) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The moral of the story isn't that people are right or wrong. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> which is why the story claims that its self is neither right nor wrong. i definitely won't place my faith in something that claims its self is neither right nor wrong.

that was wonderful Pixies, i am eagerly awaiting more (w00t)