Calax

you poke somethings eye out as the last boss, and it has absolutely nothing do to with the story otherwise.

I like Ross's art but dislike him as a person (at least from everything I've heard). He refuses to use any DC character created after 1986 because he thinks things went downhill from there. (for example when kingdom come came out the reigning green lantern was Kyle Raynor, but ross used the origional alan scott.)

paris in spring time.

kinda, it was a spell that would tick for 1-2 hundred health, it bugged out so that it wouldn't leave a pet at the end of the fight if the pet had been recalled into the hunters inventory or where ever it goes when it's not active. so the pets would come out in a city and infect everyone around, and it kept spreading until it got hotfixed. lowbies cried because 2 ticks and they die while the maxed out players laughed it off because they have over 6 or 7k health at max level. there were actual arguments by players about not removing the plague because it weeded out the whiners.

this sounds like ye olde plague.

You're playing the Wii version, I take it? And to think, some people actually believed the Wiimote would lend itself to shooters. it would if you added auto aim to it.

gods are creatures created in part via belief. or it's just one guy who gets his jollies by using humanity as a army against itself in his name

it was rushed though I thought that they should have had more of a place for the pop star after all the interactions (good ones too) with her holo, instead she's just a brat.

I sometimes do this, mostly in games like Stalker where there is no autosave. Simply because I'm not ocd about saving.

Look it's paris! ... and the upload don't want to work.

I was playing that but had to check it back into work. don't want to drop the money on it atm, trying to pay back bills and saving for halo3.

on the level with the goblin encampment in the mountains, DEAR GOD thats' alot of goblins.

theres certainly a Bible for games, Half life 1, now give games what 1943 (ish) years to get itself a catcher in the rye.

actually if you look at most games the only difference between the game portraying the story and a movie is that in the game there is usually a need to have conflict appear once every... 5-10 minutes so that the gamer remains entranced, and the fact that instead of watching the character make his way through the story, you lead the character through it. An example would be Sam and Max, you never actually were able to progress beyond a certain point without doing something, so that whole scene was you just watching and reediting the proverbial film in a way that you choose, Halflife is even better because for the most part, barring a cheat you MUST go in ONE way and down ONE path at ONE time, Admittedly the watching a guy in the corner of the screen who's barely in the shot do all the talking is gone and instead you can either look at the guy or do something else while the script runs it's course. Another quick thing, if the difference between a game and a movie is that a director controls what you see rather than the viewer/player, then why are books considered art? after all, all an author does is describe the situation and location and have you fill in the gaps as a reader. which is essentially what you do as a gamer in a game.

Statements like this makes baby jesus cry. Why do you say such horrible things? Is it because you hate freedom? or it could be because in the sequel we see Thomas jane doing the punisher again with caps shield... like what's happening in the books now.

I liked wayward son personally.

in OPEN no, in CLOSED yes.

Cap didn't kill people, Bucky did!

Or use "The Staff of Asclepius" (staff with snakes around it). Has the benefit of not being tied up with any one religion when you sell your game all over the world, never mind that the red cross may actually be a trademark. I think that's taken by the HMO Blue Cross. And I believe that if more than 50% of the donations get used for charitable necessities it's still considered a charitable organization.

October 28th, last I checked. But considering Rock Band's got the original GH devs, I'll opt for it instead. get both? guitar hero 3 will use the same guitar as before, while Rock band requires 150$

So what is the point of accumulating these "Achievement points" anyway? Bragging rights on Xbox LIVE? It is Microsoft's way of capitalizing on human competitiveness. actually if you earned enough fast enough you could concievably become a beta guy for the 360 (One of the guys at my store has a friend who had this happen with 10k Achievement points)

how about a forum contest for a shirt?

http://www.wowwiki.com/Death_Knight_(hero_class) most of it is based off the blizzcon stuff but then it's a wiki so...

that's the norm, it's just when your carting around seven 6-9 lb books your back starts to complain.

not quite, From what I can tell, you'll work to 80, do the quest, and then when you make a new character you'll have the option of picking death knight, who will START between 55-70 So its a completely different class? It would seem a little unusual to have someone invest the time and effort into getting their main to 80 only to force them to start a brand new guy and dump them into level 55-70 with no gear, money or mount. I was under the impression becoming a Death Knight was really just a fancy way of bestowing one (a few?) Epic power(s) upon your guy that would be tailored to synergize with your current class. I like my theory better then yours. well from what we can tell, they only have the one hero class. That class isn't exactly going to synergize with, say, a rogue or warrior because he doesn't even have energy or rage to pull off the more powerful moves in either class. My guess is that you'd probably have the newbie zone run for alot longer than most in order to get a Deathknight familiarized with his abilities, and it'd have some ok greens in it, maybe a blue sword, but ultimatly when it finished the deathknight would run off to hellfire peninsula or somthing to fight.