Calax

I'd probably do better as a woman than as a man overall... I'm to timid to do anything as a guy.

it didn't happen because I was out of gas and had a psyciatric appointment. Figure next time he comes up will go MUCH better (it'd better anyway)

actually it can be funny if you see hype for somthing on the same page as an article lambasting it because it sucks.

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...&n=Kithsara that's my main. I just wonder why somthing called the sun eater doesn't have a friggen fire resist to it.

I'll see dawn of war and raise you Company of Heroes.

you realize you just called Mk a parasite right? Hurlshot: I'd be happy if everyone did what you did but instead you get idiots who only pay attention to the #'s leading to a disdain amongst the player base for certain games.

every so often I have to go back through my older safer provinces and release a pack of milita, but ultimatly it gives you a ready back log of army if you get surprised by someone. MTW2 seems to have gotten much smarter and acutally builds to your policy rather than build military and just use your set policy for guidance on taxes.

Ah reviews, the old way to figure out if you like something. And yet it's also a horrible horrible way to choose something. No offense but among games there are always going to be pieces of crap (Ubersoldier being a PERFECT example) and there are diamonds in the rough (STALKER) and there are damn good games (WoW, Halo, Bioshock.) but there are also cult games, and despite what you may think Dynasty Warriors is a cult game, and yet with each iteration the score goes lower because the reviewers look at it and say "same old thing again" when that'd be like looking at halo without glasses and saying same old thing. I'm probably just a little bitter but if a reviewer doesn't like a particular genre he shouldn't review it. and while some games are disliked by many, that doesn't mean that they shouldn't get reviewed or given a hack job of a review. It seems like the entire reviewing system has gone down the drain because the big money games will get good reviews while indies or cult games will get hackjobs by someone who doesn't seem to like the entire genre much less the game itself. Thats all I'm going to say for now because I'm running on borrowed time.

I usually leave my unit production to the ai with buildings under my control. of course this is only in the areas that are governed by ai in the first place because no family member is currently there to direct the flow of things. Generally I'm a mountee, but i've been getting more and more heavy infantry for my armies because cav gets killed in an up and up fight.

Coop is fun, but sometimes you want to scream at the developers to include the four player mode (gears, i'm looking at you) yes it would take a little reworking but hey you can make it happen.

well i kicked off a war with the french and won in three turns killing every member of their royal family making their last province into rebels, contemplating moving towards either the italian peninsula or further north through poland and into the line of fire of the newbies (who arrived after the mongol hordes) my ai sucks at making units. it gave me an honest to god full army of simply siege weapons.

I'm in an on off war with both france and spain atm. so my four fortresses on europe are currently in use as fortresses. If I try and kill spain I'll get excommunicated, If I go for france same thing my crusades i've ignored for the most part in order to keep the family able to maul anything that comes near me, Troop reductions started across the board on the Islands, and I'm trying to keep myself in the black otherwise

:sigh: in my grand campaign on vanilla, my english have control over france excepting two provinces. I have more fortresses than I have money to keep up to date and more units under arms than I know what to do with.

yeah, I played Midevel 2 and found that it's the exact same game just iwth updated graphics and a few guild like things. I wish we could get Shogun back.

For the record, you'd probably be pressured into somthing with either family ties or "if you don't we'll gas those people" like threats.

The best part about having super powers is that you don't have to adjudicate by democracy, so the ultimate judge of what is "right" is YOUR interpretation. What you are basically asking is what people would do if they were made absolute ruler of the world. The best part of having super powers is that one could remake the world in whatever image desired. not necessarily. Read Supreme Power, it's kinda one of the reasons I made this thread, because american boys would probably say "I'd go wipe out the evil peoples!" "who's the evil peoples?" "the people who hate america" "well that's an awful lot of people"

And you've got the powers of superman, and after you do all the stupid stuff that everyone would probably do if they could fly, had super strength, invincibility and had sixty different vision powers, would you get involved in national fights? heck would you actually try to do a heroic thing? Because nothing is black and white anymore, who's right and whos wrong is written by the survivors (who are usually victorious, but I'm guessing that Islam will have something different in their history books than America does about what's happening). I personally wouldn't because I don't know enough about everything and everyone to make a proper decision. Who's good, who's evil, who's in the middle, who to save... to try to do the heroic thing seems like you'd end up going insane because theres too many crimes to control them effectively, meanwhile getting involved in national fights seems like your just asking to be screwed.

it's a parody of bleach, in one of the first really epic battles that happens with swords instead of rats.

Cthulu sleeps there, you can see his pillow.

It's the Rat Flail!

uh, no, read the constitution. there's an "out clause" on the habeas corpus concept in which habeas corpus can be suspended "when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it." taks who determines if the public safety requires it? a lengthy court battle in a politicized justice system that could take anywhere between 1 and 30 years before it moves? or POTUS who can then start to detain people without habeas corpus because he thinks it's in the interests of public safety? or is it congress who is so deadlocked about minor crapola that they'd never touch this with an eleven foot pole because of the political damage it might do to each representatives cause?

>.>

I'm gonna stay out of this one but, GO TALE!

But why would a punch to the face hurt more if it was punched by a zombie? I mean, the mechanical force of the impact has to be identical to that of a non-magic person and Superman can withstand the kinetic energy of a 7.62mm bullet hitting his cornea without blinking. sandman doesn't get good until the 7th issue about death True that.

I'm anakin, I seethe with generic rage.