For Gods sake (no pun intended) Sand, Bush only vetoed FEDERAL FUNDING of stem cell research. And he was correct to do so, albeit not for the reasons he actually did it. I never read a phrase in the Constitution anywhere that stated is was Uncle Sam's job to promote, fund, aid, or hinder scientific research of any kind. Stem Cell research still goes on through private funding. Mostly paid for by the "big evil pharmaceutical" companies.
This argument would be valid if uniformly applied to all research. I may be wrong but doesn't Sam finance lots of things? It's what makes all power gravitate towards Washington.
On the same point, but back on topic, I consider stem cell research priority 1 in the world right now, because I have two close people to me who may die without it. However, that does not mean opposing it is automatically bad. Democracy means representing the willl of the voters, and the voters said to Bush "We want you to be a right wing narrow moralist." I'm sick of hearing people who didn't vote (not necessarily you, Sando) bitching about the situation they're now in.