Volourn

1. Big Brother The only one I really watch.

First off, I don't hate my country. In fact, I think if someone hates their country they should simply move if at all possible. THINGS I HATE ABOUT KANADA; 1. Arrogance. When non Kanadians talk about Kanada they discuss our 'niceness', 'non arrogance'. It is a myth. We are arrogant, and we truly believe we are the best country in the world. 2. Jealousy. Even with our arrogance we are most definitely jealous of the US. It reeks in everything we do. We claim to be different, and we s trive our best to be different yet we do everything to be them, to be better than them, to show them up. 3. Poor Method of Selecting Our Prime Ministers. Other countries allow their citizens to choose their individual leader. We don't truly get that option. We get stuck voting based on party. Menaing if you prefer the Liberal in your area; but want the PC leader to be PM, you a re in a huge pickle. 4. Curling being considered our 'official national sport'. That's crap. It should be friggin' hockey.

Heh. What's funny is in the 5 games he played during the Rangers' losing streak his GAA went down, and his S% stayed the same. He also never gave up more than 3 goals (and, only did so in OT/SO). In the last game when the Rangers actually won he gave up 4 goals (on 40 shots). It doesn't look good for the Leafs as I doubt he'll give up 4 goals in back to back games, and it seems the Rangers' offense has returned. I apologize to Leaf fans in advance. " P.S. I'd like the Leafs to make the play-offs; but not at the expense of the Rangers. Weeks is a goofball.. Solid back up; but like you said, if he plays the Rangers are definitely more beatable.

A win is a win. Espicially after 6 losses. <_<

Rangers win! Rangers win! Rangers win!

He has the Jagr Curse tm too it seems.

In there are examples of Kanadians being killed by terrorists. There are also examples of Amerikans being let go quickly by terrorists away. Being loved by terrorists - even a small group of them - is not agood thing. I guarantee terrorists would kill this Kanadian within seconds. I, for one, don't appreciate being kidnapped. At all.

Isn't that called sex?

I bet it's MULTIPLAYER!

If they ruled, they'd be number 1...

Those who argue about it obviously do. Duh.

Damn that Thornton. Come on JJ, wake up!

"Would have been nice if they kept it in the country and started a branch studio over here in Vancouver." It's nice that Bioware aren't bigots and don't just stick to their own country. It's good to give their Amerikan fans employment oppurntunity without forcing them to move into an Igloo, afterall.

LOL That.. was.. too.. polite.. The Old Hades would ahve stomped a mudhole into the entire idea... the new one gives a thumbs up.. Scary!!!

Outside of Jagr, and Lundqvist; the Rangers have crappy players. They are the very definition of a two man team. There's a reason why most eevryone chose them to finish dead last in the NHL this year. "Not to derail your fine arguements, but did any of you see Ovechkin lay out Zdeno Chara last night?" No. I was paying attention to the Rangers choking plus, sadly, no games were shown on my tv last night.

"The Rangers are getting solid goaltending, as Volourn has pointed out a few times. I think that plays a major part in thier success." Of course, Lundqvist has played rather well even during the losing streak (most goals surrendered was 3, and that was in overtime). This proves his importance is at Jagr's level. Rangers are struggliing because Jagr is struggling. Simple as that.

MVP to me the importance of the player to the team's success. In the case of Ovechkin, the question is what success? As well as he's playing; would Washington be much worse if he weren't playing? Heck, can they? With Ovechkin, Washington is one of the worst teams in the leagues. Without him, they really cna't be worse. SJ is trickier since they are a middling team.. then again, they were a middling team on the bublle before Thorton came... though, they've played better with him than without. Rangers are a different situation. With Jagr playing like Jagr, the Rangers are one of the better teams in the league (even with their recent slump). Take out Jagr, and the Rangers are likely in SJ's boat - a middling team struggling to make the play-offs. That's why Jagr is the odds on favorite to win MVP.. at least right now.

Well.. technically.. they already announced ME2. Hehe. But, yeah, it's likely JE2.

Aye, espicially if Jagr doesn't start piling on the points again. Though, a 5 game losing strek (2 in OT/SO) does that to you. Still, the Rangers are virtually guaranteed a play-off spot. Though, I agree, Thornton is the only player capable of taking MVP/Scoring title away from Jagr. Though, he needs to lead the Sharks to the play-pffs to qualify as a contender for MVP, imo. Otherwise, he's no better than Ovechkin. Be MVP of your team all you want; but to be a real MVP of the entire your teams should at least be amongst the elite 8 of your conference.

Hmm... Neat. I was gonna call you on it, and say that could simply be ME; but they have ME on there already heh. So, it being JE2 is a good bet. of course, it could be ME2 since they have already technically announced ME1, ME2, and ME3. LOL :D

Good thing the Flyers suck too or the Rangers wouldn't be first in the division still. I'm sure the Rangers, and Jagr will turn things around soon. Thornton shoudl take advantage of this while he can; it won't last forever. btw, He's one point behind Jagr now. Though you are right about the two games in hand. That's what happens when jagr gets a measily 2 points in 5 games. This proves that jagr is the Ranger, and League MVP. He gets few points means the Rangers score no goals.

I'll pass. At this time, I have no interest to pay per month to play a game. I knew BIO was going to announce soemthing soon; but I epxected it to be new REAL games or something about their mega company they're part of; but this... Meh....

"And so has the US by the way. (Vietnam, but I don't find that as anything to make fun of) " I say one thing, for a loser the US sure came out of that war relatively unbloodied comapred to their opponent. LOL "They look at our actions in the past, and believe that we'll turn and run with our tails between our legs once the casualties start to get to us." 1. The US (and other Western nations) also have some history of winning some impressive wars. It seems to me people shouldn't forget how the US became a nation in the first place with the defeat of the vastly superior British army (with help from France of course). 2. The 'opponents' in the ME should look at their history before accusing others of being 'Paper Tigers'. Afterall, the 'opponents' can't even beat a small country like Isreal, and they've been trying to wipe it out for YEARS and have lost multiple wars during their attempts to do so. LOL

As long as the Rangers pair him up with one of their better defensemen,a nd mostly use him on the power play he should be alright. He needs to play the 'Leetch' role as the Rangers don't have a defenseman who can quite do that as well.

NWN2, Madden 2007, and that's it for 2006... Possibly ME1 if it actually comes out this year.