Phew taks, you're one stubborn fella. And not only that, you now have a guard dog barking when you're gone
Everyone who has a relative that has been or is currently at a war, understands that the fine line between sanity and a lord of flies-scenario isn't that far apart. However, standards should be applied, like the Geneva convention. What made me very skeptic about Gonzalez was the clear intention of his statement, that the more power to the state and less to the individual. Especially in this 'war against terror' (what aren't your government war against?) these kinds of statements should be met with great skepticism, since they leave a lot of room to be abused, if they turn into law.
Granted, we don't live in a world where states are at war with each other in the classical sense. But that doesn't excuse us from deny basic human rights to one another, and here as Walsingham stated, a piece of paper, a code of conduct is essential. Having a lawyer cherry-pick who and to whom this applies to their own needs is abuse. And looking at the current American administration previous intentions and doings with individual and human rights, Gonzalez statements should definitely raise some eyebrows.