Meshugger

Why are you swedes such white supremacists? It's like men and women never lived in Africa and America before the mighty whitey? Like, I'm thinking, you're a women and you live in Africa like several hundred years before the mighty-whitey exploration age and you're into hunting-gathering, you pretty much explore and everything. Men discovered America - yeah, because they lived there... with women. Also Amelia Earhart. Airplanes and stuff. I dunno if he's acting on racial supremacy. The latest advantages in modern civilization have come from the westerners, which often happen to be white. Lately though, the eastern civilizations, or eastern cultural hemisphere have flexed their muscles. Amelia Earhart was a pioneer for women at her time, but she didn't invent the airplane, which mkreku was talking about.

Cool, does this mean that i can establish a coorperation on US soil calling itself "The Obsidian Foundation", where i can donate as much as i want to those that i want in local/federal elections? In that case, come to me, my fellow politicians. Be my whores as you are. Or maybe i should be fair and make it a public company and sell shares only to members of this board. We can have our own mascot in congress!

dunno, i was just pointing out that the bio stuff can last a while, spores and bacteria in particular. taks Fair enough.

Maybe it has something to do with what i heard the other day: Bro's before ho's, and all that.

No they can't. Men work towards their own goals, which might, in effect, help the team as well. Please elaborate on that a bit more, that got me interested

Bayonetta Thanks

Men rule since they can work in teams for a common goal more effeciently than women, and they are physically stronger. Hasn't anyone found any answers to my previous question yet?

Why not? It's what everyone else does. What is fun and entertaining depends on the individual. That is, it exists only in their head. Sorry, must be the language barrier or something. What i was trying to say is that you shouldn't label what is truly entertaining by adding nonsense labels on what can entertain you or not. It is simply contraproductive in the long run, since you will not discover anything new or interesting that way. Of course it can, i did not claim otherwise, i was however saying that they should not be mutually exclusive. Neither is does the second sentence say anything, unless we are talking about financial gain for company that produces the product. Exactly. There's nothing wrong with that now, isn't there? Unless you tried to do a witty remark that my point bears the same weight as of a drugged up hippie.

Are asians still the smartest? are whites in the middle, and arabs and blacks in the bottom? If their brainsizes are the same, then there's something else to it, i think.

After the Burial - Aspiration Incredible guitarwork. Those guys are tight. Followed by: Kenji Kawai Live - Kugutsuuta kagirohi ha yomi ni mata muto. EPOCHAL. I dare you to watch the whole 9:55 minutes of it. Put up the volume and experience its aural beauty in full form.

God of War and what?....

Not trying to call you out bro but are you reading what your writing? A game is meant for entertainment: fun = them doing their jobs. If I want something intelligent I'll read a quantum physics textbook. My initial reaction to this post was to seriously question the moral hazard of eugenics, but nothing will come out of that, so i will respond nicely: You should not try encapsule what is intelligent, complex, fun or entertaining into artificial definitions that only exists in your head. It only serves the to simplify your surroundings and hinders the development of the mind. Entertainment is not about simple laughs, it is much more than that. Instead of disregarding something that is not entertaining in your view, learn to appriciate what you see as a thing in itself. Do not worry if something feels like it is over your head. Examine, ponder, wonder until you see it. You will get some things by the second you see them, and others might take a while, but there's nothing wrong with that. It pretty much reflects life itself. Things will open up to you. You will gain new knowledge, you'll see aestethic beauty that you previously missed, you will learn something new and profound. Intellectual curiosity is what brings out the best of man, willful ignorance is what destroys it.

I must admit that i have never heard about this game before, but a hilarious review as always. Very informative as well on why it is bad as well.

They should ask the japanese on how to do things. They seem to know how to cope with constant earthquakes.

of course there is. that doesn't make it "right wing" or any other wing unless you're trying to compare to something hard on the left (even centrists are "right" of "left"). ^meshugger: anthrax spores live decades, if not centuries, according to wiki. the chemical stuff degrades, however, so any sarin gas won't be around after only a few months. taks Oh, my bad. Did they find any anthrax though?

Duuuude, we're talking about "badass" as in sending death threats over SMSs here P.S. Nothing wrong with Darkthrone, but they(Fenriz) have had somewhat of a image-problems lately:

Well, um, does the name "Varg Vikenes", a.k.a. "Count Grisnackh", a.k.a. "Burzum" say anything to you? Hint for those that are ignorant about this: The fella makes the thoughest rapper seem like a poser in comparison. This guy is truly hardcore! Just write "Mayhem (band)" at wikipedia for your pleasure.

PC games go are about 39-49

If Saddam stockpiled any of his biological weapons from the late 80's and early 90's they would've been rendered useless by now anyways. Being biological, they simply degrade to nothing.

Ice-T is forever cool in my book for starting only good rap-metal that there ever was: Body Count. Boy, that band had the attitude N.W.A. with the ferocity of Slayer. Everyone else was simply bad copy cats. Proof: The guy in Welsingham's link is so faux tough-guy that isn't even funny. The guy wouldn't even survive a simple bar-fight with his own two fists.

Back in the middle ages, when the patriarchal power structure was even more powerful than it is now, being fat was considered as beautiful among women. I don't know about beautiful but I think it was a sign of wealth. I remeber reading that somewhere. Yes, you're right. Wealthy people had the luxury to eat themselves fat in those days. However, if you look at the paintings from the renaissance, you can not find any size zero women. "Fat" and wealthy women were the beauty ideal back then.

Only if he finds little origami unicorns on his doorstep.

Back in the middle ages, when the patriarchal power structure was even more powerful than it is now, being fat was considered as beautiful among women.

I maybe i mispoke, my question was: If we claim that there's only one human race, why do we actively encourage different breeds of animals? Thus, shouldn't selective breeding for animals considered morally wrong, since it really is eugenics?

I saw a debate the other day on TV about racism in Europe , USA and other places. Except for the old and tried that only caucasians seems to be racist, i heard one of the arguments about race itself: - "There's is no such thing as different races, just different kinds of people". Of some reason, i started to ponder upon it, but got to a dead end. Namely this: If there there is no such as different human races, why do we have, and actively breed different breeds of cats and dogs? We even are racist enough to generalize their characteristics based on breed. Some breeds are calm and needy, some are wild but friendly, some are obiedient but very aggressive, and so on. halp pleez?