Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Pictures of your games
Started by
Lucian
, Nov 23 2011 12:30 AM
#1
Posted 23 November 2011 - 12:30 AM
#2
Posted 23 November 2011 - 05:47 AM
#3
Posted 23 November 2011 - 01:34 PM
#4
Posted 23 November 2011 - 03:03 PM
#5
Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:30 PM
#6
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:10 AM
#7
Posted 24 November 2011 - 06:04 AM
Very realistic looking. The colors, the shadows, etc.

Skyrim looks pretty but still far away from realistic.
Edited by trulez, 24 November 2011 - 06:05 AM.
#8
Posted 24 November 2011 - 06:43 AM
#9
Posted 24 November 2011 - 09:21 AM
Very realistic looking. The colors, the shadows, etc.
Skyrim looks pretty but still far away from realistic.
Different environment, different trees, different light conditions. If you had a point, you didn't a good job at conveying it.
#10
Posted 24 November 2011 - 01:40 PM
The game is far from photo-realistic. I've seen so many talking about how awesome the leaves in particular are, but they drive me absolutely insane when I see them, heh. (the birchbark tree trunks look pretty good from a distance tho).
As are all games, outside of some non-gameplay cutscenes. The tech may be there to do it, but probably too much work+expense+they have to keep games with low hardware in mind.
As are all games, outside of some non-gameplay cutscenes. The tech may be there to do it, but probably too much work+expense+they have to keep games with low hardware in mind.
#11
Posted 24 November 2011 - 01:51 PM
#12
Posted 24 November 2011 - 07:49 PM
#13
Posted 25 November 2011 - 02:43 AM
#14
Posted 25 November 2011 - 01:47 PM
#15
Posted 25 November 2011 - 02:05 PM
Is that the 2nd Batman one? Liking it so far?
I noticed the 1st was on cheap Steam sale and thought about buying it but...I already have too many games.
I noticed the 1st was on cheap Steam sale and thought about buying it but...I already have too many games.
#16
Posted 26 November 2011 - 09:41 PM
Been playing around with a bunch of Skyrim graphics mods. The extra shadows, texture sharpening, and post-processing really make it almost photo-realistic in some areas. And I won't dare try running this in triple screen for risk that my comp will explode (it makes my system run really hot with only one screen!)












Edited by Bokishi, 26 November 2011 - 10:27 PM.
#17
Posted 26 November 2011 - 11:45 PM
...nope, still not even close to photo-realistic. Sorry.
But some of those look a lot better than the vanilla game, that I've seen at least.
#18
Posted 27 November 2011 - 04:39 AM
#19
Posted 27 November 2011 - 06:43 AM
I don't like that FXAA post-processing injector. It makes the game look too happy, when it should be cold and bleak.
#20
Posted 27 November 2011 - 06:56 AM
I don't like that FXAA post-processing injector. It makes the game look too happy, when it should be cold and bleak.
There are a lot of different "modes" some cut down on the contrast and adds a blue filter to make it look cold and bleak.. so there's something for everyone.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account


This topic is locked
Back to top


















