LadyCrimson

Ok, this is the one I'm going to recreate in my Abandoned Mode saves when I manually find the parts needed. More compact than the other one, 4 wall slots. I could play w/it some more but I'm burnt out for now. This is good enough - at least I don't cringe when I walk by it.

Functionally it's useless - vs simply sticking to a normal ship (no living area so no "storage/workstation" space) - but hey, it's small. Haha. It's taking advantage of overlapping, separate creation/edit stations - a sort of unintended simple glitch I suppose - you can't do this and save the design/edit, normally.

At last, I made something that isn't huge and doesn't look terrible, that I could live with as regular "main" use. And it still has 8 interior "workstation" ability if I want, plus good maneuverability and huge warp distance stats (the two I care about). So, yay? Maybe I'm getting the hang of how to use all these stupid parts. Course I'm still gonna obsessively fiddle with new/other designs for a while, before I get bored.

I can view all my attachments via profile link, but I don't see any checkboxes or way to choose ones to delete, anymore. Maybe I'm blind? Not that I have tons of them but there's several ancient ones I could remove and I recall I used to be able to with the old forum software.

Note: you can make fancier/smaller ships but if you want certain extra stat bonuses, you need moah bits. Using those bits, I have yet to figure out something I like enough to perm. keep around. So ofc it goes: "I am going to make as small a ship as possible today!" then 1-2 hours I just repeat my usual pattern. >.> Edit: oh, forum uploaded attachments don't link to a full size. Makes sense I guess. Oh well, too lazy, good enough.

No Man's Sky - Voyagers update --basic can-purchase Corvette ship parts are limited. --to get access to more you run around in the world and a few kinds of containers/poi's etc. will get you random parts. Salvage containers are what I use because it feels the fastest - guaranteed parts each one (still random) so I had a backpack full of parts before too long to fiddle with. --BUT the whole system is definitely test-bed buggy in many ways. One may not notice if creating a very simple low part Corvette and then done. The more you (over) design and constantly edit the same ship, the glitcher it seems, especially re: ship stats and the things you can place in interiors. I placed a chair, sat, and immediately sank through ship to the ground. When you edit design, tech modules shift all over the place, accidentally get duped sometimes, resources/parts disappear, various other things. --It's very fun to try to build something "cool" however - it's the main appeal probably. I've spent quite some hours trying already. Some ppl have good visual imagination for that, even using all the clunky pre-fab parts. Apparently I don't. Or at least, I keep wanting certain parts in the design, meaning my four efforts have all ended up as weirdly decorated flying fridges. --You could easily make a flying Borg cube. Which is funny. ---Corvettes would be helpful if you are an extreme minimalist, and ofc small friend groups, but honestly outside of design-fun I'm not sure I have much use for one. They are a little too awkward to use with certain quirks/limitations (edit: example, it's often hard to find open space to *land* in the Corvette- you have to teleport out of it and teleport back into it, often disappears on save reload). I'd probably just end up summoning/using my regular tiny ships most of the time anyway.

Non-GPU griping news: You can apparently now build an entire ship in No Man's Sky, walk around in it, use it as a mini-flying base (I guess?), and leap into space out of it. I've downloaded the update but haven't turned it on yet. If one can build a decent mini-base sized ship that doesn't fly/handle/land like the Titanic, it'd be my dream. No need for a freighter then. It'd be nice if they put the build-station in Abandoned Mode too, but probably not. Hasn't happened yet, but by the time Light No Fire releases, NMS may/is gonna need a new PC to run it well/max. It's not really that deep a dive but if one wants to hear him talk about it a little.

I'd still rather be able to have mostly High, a few Med settings (highest textures and draw distance is my main "must") and not use DLSS at all, even with enforced RT lighting (not full path tracing) but it has advanced enough that Quality-DLSS is acceptable in most cases. Balanced degrades noticeably to my eyes and anything below that is still UghNope-Killitwithfire (on the 55"). I might accept 18-Vram if that became a thing and the price was right, but I definitely want more than 16 re: a new gpu.

Far as I'm concerned, it's very intentional. And yes I know re: bus size, ddr capacity etc. being limiting factors. Hence, "design better." 6070-6080 should be 16gb vram minimum. I suppose the xx60 could remain at 12. If 60xx generation has any 8gb cards I'll roll my eyes pretty hard. Just me tho. edit: I personally want 24gb min, which is why I keep looking at the xx90's.

Yeah I'm in kind of the same boat. I could build around a 5070ti for now but it doesn't seem worth it. I mean I still ran the Indy game "fine" even if at fake-4k/DLSS and it looked fine on the 55". I always build with a lot of longevity in mind (it's fun having a topend for a year or two but I mean since I don't mind turning down settings over the years) and with all these devs/game busy upping the ante, I don't have a sense of "uber longevity" from the 50xx series. If I'm going to spend 2k-3k on a topend GPU (because I'm a fool) it better last me at least 8 years. I suppose I keep hoping the companies will get their stuff together better for the next series, too. I'd like an equivalent of something like a 6080ti (whatever they call it) with 24 vram. I'm so sick of low VRAM on new gpu's. Design better, gpu makers. Not just gpu but cpu too. I'm disgruntled w/pc gaming overall. Heh. the other main factor for me tho is pure laziness. Buying parts/putting a pc together isn't so bad, but setting up O/S, transferring oodles of data etc = 2-3 weeks of hell. Never in a hurry to do that.

Most of the time when i wake up/am woken up, I am immediately too awake to go back to sleep. Although as I get older, it's become a little less "immediately jump out of bed, brain full-on" and more "sit up blinking for a minute then pull myself out of bed while trying not to trip/fall down." When I first met hubby, he'd wake up quick and only hit the snooze button a couple times. By the time he was early 30's, the alarm often didn't wake him up until it had been going off for 10+ minutes, until I'd hit him to turn it off, and then the snooze button cycle. Since I almost never use my "smartphone" I still barely know how to do anything with it outside of take a picture.

Do you guys use your phone as the alarm clock these days? I still find the quartz clock super loud beeping that gets faster and faster or the 'big ben" firebell alarm to be best for waking you up. Y'know, the sort that can be heard down the hallway into the living room. Music/the radio has never worked for me. Digital sounds through speakers also not great, for me. Of course, actually getting up and not flopping back onto your pillow is another matter. My husband annoyed me with one hour of blasting radio music or beepbeepbeep snooze-alarming, every single morning, for many many years. That on top of his 80-100decibel snoring (made my ears ring sometimes) eventually chased me out of sleeping in the same bed. I've slept so much deeper/better since. Pffft.

Btw, I'm not ticked re: BL4's requirements vs. my personal hardware. I'm barely interested in the game, really. I'm just tired of all these games thinking they have to up the ante (usually this means graphix-tech) when there isn't really much reason to do so for the game/series. I mean sure, if a dev wants to make a super fancy showcase, they can do that/some games are meant for that. But I see no reason for BL4 to have that min. requirement (could've been a gtx 9xx min, say). I'm guessing that min. is because of RT that maybe you can't entirely turn off - I looked it up, BL4 will "feature ray tracing." (sigh) Nvidia's BL4 "showcase" video is showing/claiming 200+ fps, meaning without DLSS4/frame generation it's likely many are going to have poor - or at least not the desired - performance, since, y'know, most people don't even have a 50xx. Edit: that said the showcase video is pure marketing bull, since they don't even tell you what gpu or original resolution they're using to get those frame-generation fps.

According to the rumor mill, Trump is deadly ill with maybe congestive heart failure and may only have 6-12 months to live! ......I can only dream. ......he doesn't seem particularly healthy recently but he might still make his term. His age, his past/present lifestyle, who bloody knows.

Watched 1st episode of Butterfly, on Prime. I thought, for some reason, that it was going to be an action k-drama, but apparently US. I think it's kind of a spy/assassin group thriller or something. That 1st episode did nothing to make me want to watch a 2nd. It's not that it's terrible, but I felt tossed into action with zero chr. notions outside of "some man wants/thinks he has to rescue his daughter from an organization, who may not need/want to be rescued from said organization since she seems to enjoy her assassination job." eg, I had no reason to care either way. I suppose the 2nd episode might explain background/history but like I said, it didn't make me care enough to find out. Also, it's mostly in English but the way they dealt with Korean speaking moments was annoying. A couple lines in Korean w/subtitles, then suddenly a couple lines in English, then back to Korean. I guess that was so ppl who don't like subtitles don't have to read as many subtitles? It was lame. The action-y stuff was ok I guess.