Hurlshort Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 No way. In 2016 the NY times estimated 1.4M Americans out of 323M were trans. That's like 0.0001 %. There are 1.9M service member in all four branches counting reserves. That would mean a percentage of 0.008. There is no way the military, an occupation that for many reasons might not appeal to the trans would have a HIGHER percentage than the general population. It would either be the same or less. The last paragraph addresses that bit: There is other evidence that transgender individuals represent a larger portion of those in the military than their proportion among adults in the US population. In a survey of transgender people assigned male at birth, Shipherd et al. found that 30 percent had served in the military, which is similar to military service among transgender people assigned male at birth in the NTDS. 9 A recent study by Blosnich et al. reviewed all health records of veterans receiving health care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from 2000 through 2011 and found a prevalence of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) five times that of the US general population.10 Though individuals with GID diagnoses may or may not identify as transgender, the substantially higher prevalence of GID among veterans in the VHA system provides further evidence that transgender people are overrepresented in the US military. My guess would be it has something to do with the appeal of service. The military has always been popular as an option for those struggling to find their identity. There seems to be some overlap according to this survey.
Guard Dog Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 No way. In 2016 the NY times estimated 1.4M Americans out of 323M were trans. That's like 0.0001 %. There are 1.9M service member in all four branches counting reserves. That would mean a percentage of 0.008. There is no way the military, an occupation that for many reasons might not appeal to the trans would have a HIGHER percentage than the general population. It would either be the same or less. The last paragraph addresses that bit: There is other evidence that transgender individuals represent a larger portion of those in the military than their proportion among adults in the US population. In a survey of transgender people assigned male at birth, Shipherd et al. found that 30 percent had served in the military, which is similar to military service among transgender people assigned male at birth in the NTDS. 9 A recent study by Blosnich et al. reviewed all health records of veterans receiving health care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from 2000 through 2011 and found a prevalence of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) five times that of the US general population.10 Though individuals with GID diagnoses may or may not identify as transgender, the substantially higher prevalence of GID among veterans in the VHA system provides further evidence that transgender people are overrepresented in the US military. My guess would be it has something to do with the appeal of service. The military has always been popular as an option for those struggling to find their identity. There seems to be some overlap according to this survey. I never thought about it that way. I was looking at it more from a perspective of folks with gender dysphoria already having a clue about themselves. At any rate this hearkens back to a discussion you and i participated in not long ago about the benefits of gender-reassignment surgery. I still disagree with you and assert it is an elective surgery. A man who identifies as female and has an operation is still a man afterwards. Just with a few bits moved around. Ditto for the women. It is superficial, skin deep, a nose job. If they want it, more power to them but don't ask the tax payers to cover it for you. Until we figure out a way to swap that Y chromosome for an X or vice versa, you are stuck with what you were born with. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell
Raithe Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Federal Judge nominee claims Bible precedes Constitution "Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum."
Bartimaeus Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/26/the-military-spends-five-times-as-much-on-viagra-as-it-would-on-transgender-troops-medical-care/ Man, that's just silly. Quote How I have existed fills me with horror. For I have failed in everything - spelling, arithmetic, riding, tennis, golf; dancing, singing, acting; wife, mistress, whore, friend. Even cooking. And I do not excuse myself with the usual escape of 'not trying'. I tried with all my heart. In my dreams, I am not crippled. In my dreams, I dance.
Chilloutman Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Federal Judge nominee claims Bible precedes Constitution oh boy oh boy I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"
Guard Dog Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Federal Judge nominee claims Bible precedes Constitution Can't open that page. Well... if she means chronologically she's right. I suspect that isn't what them mean. 1 "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell
Guard Dog Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Why they hell are we covering Viagra? My insurance does not even cover that. Not that I need it..... 2 "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell
Ben No.3 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Why they hell are we covering Viagra? My insurance does not even cover that. Not that I need it..... a true capitalist system always gives you options to rise 3 Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Gfted1 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Eh, Viagra and Cialis are about to drop off the exclusive list and generic equivalents are just around the corner and the price will crater. Free boner pills for everyone! 1 "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Ben No.3 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Eh, Viagra and Cialis are about to drop off the exclusive list and generic equivalents are just around the corner and the price will crater. Free boner pills for everyone! seize the means of reproduction! 1 Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Gfted1 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 seize the means of reproduction! No can do! You young chumps are firing blanks. Ok, back to Trump bashing. What an a-hole he is for the transgender rule. "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Chilloutman Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 never heard about these guys, can some of our german speaking friends there confirm if this is fake news? Have the information media in the 2015/16 reporting on the 'refugee crisis' met their responsibilities? About whom was reported when and how? These and other questions are addressed by the OBS study by Prof. Dr. Michael Haller after. In the methodically complex investigation, more than 30,000 newspaper reports were recorded, longitudinal analyzes were undertaken back to 2005, and reports from news sites such as lead media were analyzed. The study shows that large sections of journalists have failed to recognize their professional role and have neglected the enlightenment function of their media. Instead of acting as a neutral observer to critically accompany the politics and its enforcement bodies, information journalism took over the view, including the slogans of the political elite. The findings prove the great alienation between the established journalism and parts of the population. https://translate.google.cz/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.otto-brenner-preis.de/&prev=search I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"
Hurlshort Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 I never thought about it that way. I was looking at it more from a perspective of folks with gender dysphoria already having a clue about themselves. At any rate this hearkens back to a discussion you and i participated in not long ago about the benefits of gender-reassignment surgery. I still disagree with you and assert it is an elective surgery. A man who identifies as female and has an operation is still a man afterwards. Just with a few bits moved around. Ditto for the women. It is superficial, skin deep, a nose job. If they want it, more power to them but don't ask the tax payers to cover it for you. Until we figure out a way to swap that Y chromosome for an X or vice versa, you are stuck with what you were born with. I can respect that. And honestly, if the tweet had simply said that the government will not be covering and transgender surgeries at the expense of the taxpayers, it would be a more reasonable argument. But Trump said they were going to ban a certain group of people from the military. That is pretty much textbook discrimination. 1
Chilloutman Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 I never thought about it that way. I was looking at it more from a perspective of folks with gender dysphoria already having a clue about themselves. At any rate this hearkens back to a discussion you and i participated in not long ago about the benefits of gender-reassignment surgery. I still disagree with you and assert it is an elective surgery. A man who identifies as female and has an operation is still a man afterwards. Just with a few bits moved around. Ditto for the women. It is superficial, skin deep, a nose job. If they want it, more power to them but don't ask the tax payers to cover it for you. Until we figure out a way to swap that Y chromosome for an X or vice versa, you are stuck with what you were born with. I can respect that. And honestly, if the tweet had simply said that the government will not be covering and transgender surgeries at the expense of the taxpayers, it would be a more reasonable argument. But Trump said they were going to ban a certain group of people from the military. That is pretty much textbook discrimination. would you tell same for example about astronaut? I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"
Hurlshort Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 would you tell same for example about astronaut? I am not sure I understand the question. All I care about for both soldiers, astronauts, etc. is whether they are physically fit and able to do the job.
HoonDing Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 This takes me back. When I worked for the military I met a transgender officer. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
Elerond Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Buzzfeed makes it sound life in Pentagon is quite nerve-racking these day. https://www.buzzfeed.com/coralewis/trump-transgender-military-service?utm_term=.fxq55qLn07#.upJ00JLrE9 "At the Pentagon, the first of the three tweets raised fears that the president was getting ready to announce strikes on North Korea or some other military action. Many said they were left in suspense for nine minutes, the time between the first and second tweet. Only after the second tweet did military officials receive the news the president was announcing a personnel change on Twitter."
Malcador Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Why they hell are we covering Viagra? My insurance does not even cover that. Not that I need it..... Have to ensure all weapons are functional. 1 Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
Ben No.3 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 (edited) I find the degree of support for transgender and generally gender identity amongst large parts of the left weird. It's... very besides the point. The whole idea of gender identity preserves and even strengthens the notion that character attributes are attached to biological gender. No man can identify as a woman, they can only identify as female; and vice versa. I do think these people should be able to do whatever the he'll they want, but as a political ideology it is very counterproductive when what should be archived is the separation of biological gender and character. What I'm trying to say is that you can't try to liberate women from their submissive role in society and at the same time propagate the idea of identifying as a woman (as in, identifying with the female character including of course said submission). It's contradictory to say on the one hand "you aren't born a woman, you are made a woman" and on the other hand to say "you can be born a man but truly be a woman". So yes. Can we please shift focus back to further liberation instead of wearing down past progress? Edited July 26, 2017 by Ben No.3 2 Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
HoonDing Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 as long as they can shoot commies muslims i don't care what's between their legs The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
Azdeus Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 (edited) My guess would be it has something to do with the appeal of service. The military has always been popular as an option for those struggling to find their identity. There seems to be some overlap according to this survey. It's also possible that it is a result of trying to overcompensate, if you follow my train of thought. Some trans people can feel they need to prove they are more manly than what they are deep down, and it's definetly seen as very manly being in the service. To be fair, Klinger vehemently denied being transgender to the shrink (Sydney iirc) so even he wasn't that desperate in the end Edited July 26, 2017 by Azdeus Civilization, in fact, grows more and more maudlin and hysterical; especially under democracy it tends to degenerate into a mere combat of crazes; the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary. - H.L. Mencken
Chilloutman Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 would you tell same for example about astronaut? I am not sure I understand the question. All I care about for both soldiers, astronauts, etc. is whether they are physically fit and able to do the job. nice dodge, mental health is irelevant? When I stretch it - i have same problem with new ''Alien' movies. I just can't stand that fact that you would pick so volatile and ''disturbed'' people on mission costing bazilions of cash. If it would be on you wouldn't you pick people 'suited' for that job? I think military is very similiar in that regard... I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"
Hurlshort Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 would you tell same for example about astronaut? I am not sure I understand the question. All I care about for both soldiers, astronauts, etc. is whether they are physically fit and able to do the job. nice dodge, mental health is irelevant? When I stretch it - i have same problem with new ''Alien' movies. I just can't stand that fact that you would pick so volatile and ''disturbed'' people on mission costing bazilions of cash. If it would be on you wouldn't you pick people 'suited' for that job? I think military is very similiar in that regard... I wasn't trying to dodge, I really didn't understand your question. So your feeling is that transgender people are not mentally equipped to handle military service, I take it? That seems like a pretty serious accusation, and also a slippery slope. Are women unfit for duty? Hormones and all that. There already is a mental health requirement for enlistees in the military. The only thing that should matter is if the person can pass that, regardless of anything else. Lets be honest, the military is going to attract some head cases. Their gender identity is pretty low on my list of worries as to who we give access to heavy weaponry. 2
Guard Dog Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Apparently Bernie Sanders has been stealing his neighbor's newspaper: http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/07/25/report-bernie-sanders-stealing-neighbors-newspaper-d-c/ Makes sense I guess. The neighbor has a paper, Bernie does not. How is that fair? Where is the justice in that? "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell
Elerond Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 Apparently Bernie Sanders has been stealing his neighbor's newspaper: http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/07/25/report-bernie-sanders-stealing-neighbors-newspaper-d-c/ Makes sense I guess. The neighbor has a paper, Bernie does not. How is that fair? Where is the justice in that? In socialism it is called involuntary sharing for common good.
Recommended Posts