HoonDing Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 Actually they literally can't even speak out the word 'abortion' or they lose funds. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
majestic Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) Not everyone believes Planned Parenthood's claims: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/23/watch-planned-parenthoods-pre-natal-care-deception/ Thanks for those alternative facts. Don't lie. Breitbart offers only flat facts, nothing more. Besides, everyone knows aborted fetuses get cooked into vaccinations that contain mercury and cause autism. Edited January 24, 2017 by majestic 1 No mind to think. No will to break. No voice to cry suffering.
BrotherFerg Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Will Trump have a hunny moon? It doesn't look like it even G Dub had his moment of shine. Why does a chair have arms and legs like a man, but can't walk or hold things?
PK htiw klaw eriF Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Besides, everyone knows aborted fetuses get cooked into vaccinations that contain mercury and cause autism. Don't give away my recipe. Will Trump have a hunny moon? It doesn't look like it even G Dub had his moment of shine.Yes, Ivanka will shower him with golden love. "Akiva Goldsman and Alex Kurtzman run the 21st century version of MK ULTRA." - majestic "you're a damned filthy lying robot and you deserve to die and burn in hell." - Bartimaeus "Without individual thinking you can't notice the plot holes." - InsaneCommander "Just feed off the suffering of gamers." - Malcador "You are calling my taste crap." -Hurlshort "thankfully it seems like the creators like Hungary less this time around." - Sarex "Don't forget the wakame, dumbass" -Keyrock "Are you trolling or just being inadvertently nonsensical?' -Pidesco "we have already been forced to admit you are at least human" - uuuhhii "I refuse to buy from non-woke businesses" - HoonDing "feral camels are now considered a pest" - Gorth "Melkathi is known to be an overly critical grumpy person" - Melkathi "Oddly enough Sanderson was a lot more direct despite being a Mormon" - Zoraptor "I found it greatly disturbing to scroll through my cartoon's halfing selection of genitalias." - Wormerine "I love cheese despite the pain and carnage." - ShadySands
Wrath of Dagon Posted January 25, 2017 Author Posted January 25, 2017 Uh, no it's not. There's a heavily edited video of a sting to send a fake pimp and prostitute in to score free abortions at an alleged (but unknown) clinic and a heavily edited video of a sting showing an alleged (but unknown) Planned Parenthood staff member advising abortion first, as well as an ambiguous and heavily edited video of a Planned Parenthood doctor naming figures and tissues. It's snippets of conversations that out of context could possibly, maybe, if you're being especially uncharitable on purpose, could maybe interpret as possibly being about those things, maybe. I ain't seein' no fetal bits caught on film. The first two have full-length 30 minute versions that disprove the conclusions made by Live Action (for example, the staff advised about ten different things before advising abortion that were just edited out) available at *shiver* HuffPost (yeah I know, about as reliable as Breitbart is but they had the full footage and the footage is important, not the article): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/01/live-action-planned-parenthood-videos_n_1563241.html And as for the latter, there's a very detailed Snopes post for that footage that essentially comes to the conclusion of "Mixed on account of we don't even know what they're talking about because it's edited in ways that nearly every quote lacks context and it's not logically possible to determine what is being referred to". http://www.snopes.com/pp-baby-parts-sale/ So as far as I can tell, hoaxes. This coupled with what I said about how they would somehow get away with all this and all staff at Planned Parenthood centers somehow being okay with it... this conspiracy sounds about as likely to me as faking the moonlanding. And let's not even get in to the fact that they make money of their monetized YouTube videos. I don't see how your links contradict anything, more like some liberal organizations making excuses. And the reason PP gets away with all that is exactly because Democrats protect them. I guess to be really sure I'd have to watch the entire unedited video, but I'm just not that interested, sorry. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan
PK htiw klaw eriF Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Who needs to check facts when you've got alternative facts? 4 "Akiva Goldsman and Alex Kurtzman run the 21st century version of MK ULTRA." - majestic "you're a damned filthy lying robot and you deserve to die and burn in hell." - Bartimaeus "Without individual thinking you can't notice the plot holes." - InsaneCommander "Just feed off the suffering of gamers." - Malcador "You are calling my taste crap." -Hurlshort "thankfully it seems like the creators like Hungary less this time around." - Sarex "Don't forget the wakame, dumbass" -Keyrock "Are you trolling or just being inadvertently nonsensical?' -Pidesco "we have already been forced to admit you are at least human" - uuuhhii "I refuse to buy from non-woke businesses" - HoonDing "feral camels are now considered a pest" - Gorth "Melkathi is known to be an overly critical grumpy person" - Melkathi "Oddly enough Sanderson was a lot more direct despite being a Mormon" - Zoraptor "I found it greatly disturbing to scroll through my cartoon's halfing selection of genitalias." - Wormerine "I love cheese despite the pain and carnage." - ShadySands
Gromnir Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) http://abovethelaw.com/2017/01/supreme-court-update-and-then-there-were-three/ am kinda conflicted 'bout the notion o' pryor being the most unlikely o' the seeming three finalists. a fine judge who deserves consideration but getting the Presidential nomination woulda' resulted in a senate bloodbath. would be unseemly to see a fine jurist such as pryor staked out like the goat in jurassic park. then again, would be fun to watch trump view the proceedings impotently, and possible self-destructive, predictable tweeting vitriolic at democrat and republican senators alike. as 'tween hardiman and gorsuch, gorsuch would be our choice as he is the kinda writer who is gonna make his fellow Justices better. the thing is, while both potential nominees is textualists, neither has any kinda obvious question marks on their legal résumé. is gonna be tough for democrats to reasonable oppose either, though after the unfortunate situation with judge garland, they may simple dig in and refuse 60 to any trump nominee. HA! Good Fun! ps one wonders how long before the fbi starts a stalker file for keyrock. won't be surprised if he ends up on a no-fly list. Edited January 25, 2017 by Gromnir "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Wrath of Dagon Posted January 25, 2017 Author Posted January 25, 2017 I remember Ann Gorsuch. Man the left hated her. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan
Gromnir Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 how on earth are you reading? in both instances, Gromnir observes that individual Congressmen will act in their own best interest regardless o' some kinda perceived external notion from pundits regarding what is best for the party. we noted that in 2016 numerous Congressmen did indeed distance themselves from trump as 'posed to aligning with party interests. so, how do you see hypocrisy? HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Meshugger Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Step 1: Make a provocative statement Step 2: Cause a media uproar: "What can change the nature of a fact?" Step 3: Accuse media of being unreasonable about the nature of facts, escalating the issue to an outrage Step 4: Work on stuff that matters like TPP, Keystone, EPA and NAFTA in peace while enjoying the lime light on facts that don't matter Step 5: The few reporters who report on facts that matter are drowned in the sea of those that don't Step 6: Smile "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Gromnir Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 in both cases Gromnir states it is foolish to claim what the Party must or will do as Congressmen act in their own self interest. *zoom* went right over your head. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Gromnir Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 in both cases Gromnir states it is foolish to claim what the Party must or will do as Congressmen act in their own self interest. *zoom* went right over your head. HA! Good Fun! No. In first case Gromnir states what congressmen must or will do. In second case Gromnir states that stating what congressmen must or will do is asinine. *zoom* hypocrisy goes over Gromnir head. HA! Good Fun! incorrect. in the first case Gromnir rejects the notion that Republicans, as a whole, must stand together with trump. more than a handful o' prominent republicans distanced themselves from trump during the 2016 election. is nothing to prevent them from making a similar choice in 2017 and beyond. in the second instance, Gromnir again rejected the notion that the republican party, as a collective, had some kinda "party approved justice profile." trying to suggest a kinda borg collective mentality for the republican party is asinine. how on earth is you reading? HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Gromnir Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Sharp_one recognizes Gromnirs being hypocrite. possible language barrier fail? dunno. a personal fail o' Gromnir is dogged consistency. HA! Good Fun! ps another example o' why it is foolish to see Republicans as some kinda hive mind http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/lindsey-graham-trump-kill-list-233898 http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/24/politics/lindsey-graham-trump-illegal-votes/ Edited January 25, 2017 by Gromnir "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
ManifestedISO Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Could probably set your clock by mock imitations by now. All Stop. On Screen.
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 What happened to only using academic sources? Or at least trustworthy sources? Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Blarghagh Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 That was never going to happen since there's no such things. Academic sources on current news don't exist and trustworthy is very clearly subjective. 3
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 That was never going to happen since there's no such things. Academic sources on current news don't exist and trustworthy is very clearly subjective. There some things you can do... for example: Today, 8 richtest own as much as poorest 50% What to do of this and how to regard is is indeed very subjective. The fact as such is however a fact. I think we should agree that we all need to back our sources with another source, and that other source should be as independent from the first one as possible. Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Blarghagh Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 That was from a research paper, not political news, and you're highly misremembering that thread if you think people considered it and the organisation it came from unbiased and trustworthy.
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Please just do. your research.... The communist party of the US supported racial equality. Period. Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Meshugger Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Of course the communist party supported racial equality. As a death cult, it makes sure that everyone is welcomed and where we will all be truly equal in the end. 1 "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Of course the communist party supported racial equality. As a death cult, it makes sure that everyone is welcomed and where we will all be truly equal in the end. What's so death culty about the communist party? Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Barothmuk Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Please just do. your research.... The communist party of the US supported racial equality. Period. iirc they also supported the US internment of Japanese civilians. Anyways how does this follow from anything that was being discussed?
Gorgon Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Anyone notice how Trump makes a big deal out of signing those executive orders. He holds them up like he's showing something off at an auction describing them in detail while his underlings stand to attention behind him. It's just so bizarre. 1 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Please just do. your research.... The communist party of the US supported racial equality. Period. iirc they also supported the US internment of Japanese civilians. Anyways how does this follow from anything that was being discussed? It arose during a discussion few days ago wether "anything good ever came out of socialism". Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Ben No.3 Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Anyone notice how Trump makes a big deal out of signing those executive orders. He holds them up like he's showing something off at an auction describing them in detail while his underlings stand to attention behind him. It's just so bizarre. That's how populism works... you need a constant source of input to stir up the people. If that dies down, populism looses its support. Now, if the populist is the opposing party then it's easy: just constantly attack everyone in government and everything they do. That's how the election was won. If the populist is in power, that doesn't work. So they constantly need to show off their "great new archivements" to keep it going. If they can't portrait themselves as "te greatest ever!", they loose all attraction and thus power. Edited January 25, 2017 by Ben No.3 Everybody knows the deal is rotten Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton For your ribbons and bows And everybody knows
Recommended Posts