Jump to content

I got a cloak!


Recommended Posts

Of protection and it's awesome!

 

cloak.jpg

I see the dreams so marvelously sad

 

The creeks of land so solid and encrusted

 

Where wave and tide against the shore is busted

 

While chanting by the moonlit twilight's bed

 

trees (of Twin Elms) could use more of Magran's touch © Durance

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

never got a ring, but the bracers don't interfere.

I see the dreams so marvelously sad

 

The creeks of land so solid and encrusted

 

Where wave and tide against the shore is busted

 

While chanting by the moonlit twilight's bed

 

trees (of Twin Elms) could use more of Magran's touch © Durance

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we would prefer a duster and/or stetson o' protection.  black of course.

 

...

 

is actual kinda ironic.

 

HA! Good Fun!

  • Like 1

"If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)

"Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we would prefer a duster and/or stetson o' protection.  black of course.

 

...

 

is actual kinda ironic.

 

HA! Good Fun!

 

Johnny Cash? Fallout: New Vegas? Dammit I don't get it. Literary irony? I wish I was smarter. 

All Stop. On Screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad thing you cannot use cloak and an amulet at the same time - from reasons unknown in PoE they both go into same slot..

It's because both are tied around your neck. Why you can't have both is for the same reason you can't wear 10 magic rings at the same time.

"Wizards do not need to be The Dudes Who Can AoE Nuke You and Gish and Take as Many Hits as a Fighter and Make all Skills Irrelevant Because Magic."

-Josh Sawyer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rings/cloaks/amulets of protection don't stack? *sigh*

See I was just making a DnD joke when I posted that but it will be hilarious if true.  All the haters gonna have to get over it, after all, it is just like in the IE games! :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rings/cloaks/amulets of protection don't stack? *sigh*

 

Only cloak and amulets, they take up a shared "neck" slot or something like that.

 

And yeah, it feels.. odd as hell.

 

 

See I was just making a DnD joke when I posted that but it will be hilarious if true.  All the haters gonna have to get over it, after all, it is just like in the IE games! tongue.png

In the IE games, you could have amulets and cloaks at the same time.

Edited by Luckmann

t50aJUd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You misunderstood. Karkarov in his reply to G1fted was referring to the "of Protection" property not stacking, not the ability to wear a cloak and an amulet at the same time.

I am glad someone got the joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a ring of +10 Deflection.

 

My tank has 99 deflection at the moment.

In other words, you've got 99 problems but a Crit ain't one? 6_u

  • Like 1

Should we not start with some Ipelagos, or at least some Greater Ipelagos, before tackling a named Arch Ipelago? 6_u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I got a ring of +10 Deflection.

 

My tank has 99 deflection at the moment.

In other words, you've got 99 problems but a Crit ain't one? 6_u

If the opponent has 94 accuracy he is still getting crit.

Edited by Bazy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...