obyknven Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 As predicted US use airstrikes against ISIS as covering for war against Syria. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/air-strikes-on-islamic-state-target-syrias-largest-gas-plant/story-e6frg6so-1227073500147?nk=f4a0392d7d63ec3e51198cdef1f57af6 Air strikes on Islamic State target Syria’s largest gas plant In other words they do want destroy Syrian property and important Syrian economical structures. The Terror against civilian objects It's usual strategy of NATO (and his predecessors - during WW2 they bombed peaceful German towns instead of military objects by same way), we see many examples of this during war in Serbia, Iraq and Libya. As usual your understanding of these events is horribly misinformed ISIS controls certain energy resources in Syria, the airstrikes are designed to weaken and destroy ISIS ability to generate revenue and wage war. Therefore obviously this gas plant is a legitimate target as by destroying this you reduce the military effectiveness of ISIS as they have less money to fund there operations Wat? How ISIS can use this gas plant if they're don't have ports and surrounded by hostile countries from all sides? What profit they can have from this if they can't sell this gas to somewhere? If they don't have profit from this how they can be weakened by destruction of this plant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now