Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 (edited) I noticed something. There are lots of stories in which the player character is somehow special, chosen by destiny, aided by the gods. All this mostly because he/she was at the right place at the right time or simply just because it's the player character. How many times did we experience that the main driving force behind the story was that the player character was the "chosen one"? How many times did we stop the evil forces from doing something really bad, just because it's something really bad and we are "meant" to stop it from happening? This type of story carries the message that those people who are not "chosen" by fate cannot achieve anything. I really hate that, because it's a false message. What would you say to the idea to flip over the coin this time? Let's play a character who is shunned by the gods, struck by a cursed fate, branded with an inescapable death at the hands of greater forces. As the story progresses we could see how this character escapes certain death again and again, against all odds, just by the sheer power of his / her will alone. He / she would not do the quests in order to stop some ancient evil, but only for the reason that he / she wants to live. Stopping a calamity could be just something that follows from the actions of the pc and the character may be entirely indifferent about it! I would like to play a story where the main goal would be something humanely impossible, yet, at the end of it the character could achieve it! Like, in order to end a curse that brands you as the target of undead spirits every night, you have to kill a (demi)god! Or take Baldurs Gate 2 for an example. I *really* hated that despite all my efforts i could not save Viconia, no matter what choices i made. What i wanted was the crazy option to go after Lolth, even if slaying her would have turned out impossible at the end! My character would have tried it! This type of story carries the message that no matter what happens, even if the most powerful being in the universe strikes you down it is in the human nature to stand up and fight again! Even if it seems futile at first! You do not have to be favored by fate to do great things! Humans are not the playthings of greater powers! (at least, involuntarily, that is) There is no need for the aid of gods, you can achieve your goals from your own power (with the help of your companions)! Edit: i see that i posted this in the wrong section, i don't know how that happened, sorry about that It would be great to see a game, where the player character is not "forced" or "conditioned" to play the "good" guy by appropriate feedback from the game itself! If my pc doesn't really wants to help that old lady, then that's it, the old lady might be screwed for all i care! And why would my pc help that old lady anyway? Just to stay true to his "lawful good" alignment i have to fight some rather dangerous trolls to get some stupid old book back? Or spend some valuable coin on something utterly meaningless? Bleh! :D I can just kill the old hag, take the coin that was meant for the reward and be done with it! Perhaps i will even go after that old book afterwards! Of course, this would not mean that my actions would have no consequence at all, i just wouldn't see it immediately in a change of alignment for example! My character might even think that he is actually lawful good, when in reality, considering the *long term* consequences of his actions, he tends to be chaotic evil! And what does "good", "evil" mean anyway? All that should matter are the consequences of your actions and whether you are favored by some group or shunned by other! For example, the habit of killing old ladies makes the player character indifferent about killing (seemigly unimportant or weak) npc's and this could lead to very dangerous consequences in *later parts* of the game! (so the player is tempted not to load his / her *much earlier* save when facing the crisis that came from his / her earlier questionable actions) Edited October 24, 2012 by Naesh 1
Gromnir Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 What would you say to the idea to flip over the coin this time? Let's play a character who is shunned by the gods, struck by a cursed fate, branded with an inescapable death at the hands of greater forces. As the story progresses we could see how this character escapes certain death again and again, against all odds, just by the sheer power of his / her will alone. He / she would not do the quests in order to stop some ancient evil, but only for the reason that he / she wants to live. Stopping a calamity could be just something that follows from the actions of the pc and the character may be entirely indifferent about it! http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.html is a good read. *shrug* in any event, cursed by god is little different than chosen. is just a different kinda special. regardless, every crpg made since internet has been 'round has seen some number o' people reject the notion o' special protagonist. heck, various developers (including obsidian) has claimed to makes non-special protagonists. am doubting you ever get what you want. there is industry-wide recognized expectations of the Average Gamer, and that includes wish fulfillment. oh, and we as gonna just complete ignore anything you said once you started talking alignment... 'cause alignment is stoopid. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
AgentOrange Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Yes I would indeed like to see Obsidian do a Berserk RPG. 2
Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Author Posted October 24, 2012 there is industry-wide recognized expectations of the Average Gamer, and that includes wish fulfillment. Surely the average gamer (who likes Planescape Torment for example) doesn't wish to be treated like a puppet on strings all the time. I see catering to the need of wish fulfillment in the possibility to do things more easily than in real life. I guess that is why the romance thread is so popular. Even so, in real life you do not have to be "chosen" by fate to be loved back. In reality, if you spend some time together with a compatible person, that alone is enough for the feelings to develop. It's more like an invisible natural force is at work. Love is hardly the "reward" of your wordly achievements or fetch quests. (They might be required, but definitely not sufficient. ) In my opinion it would be a bad idea to rub it under the pc's nose that "You are chosen by the gods. That's why you can have anyone in the game as your wife. " If you look at it, this sends the message to the player that in real life he / she is pathethic, incompetent and will never achieve anything. But maybe it's as You say and that's the message the average gamer wants to hear at every turn.
Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Author Posted October 24, 2012 Yes I would indeed like to see Obsidian do a Berserk RPG. And Berserk is very successful! In my opinion this type of storytelling is much more awesome!
Gromnir Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 there is industry-wide recognized expectations of the Average Gamer, and that includes wish fulfillment. Surely the average gamer (who likes Planescape Torment for example) doesn't wish to be treated like a puppet on strings all the time. if the Average Gamer had bought and liked ps:t, we might not be having this conversation. ps:t did not sell by any measure that were relevant or meaningful in the industry. that being said, am guessing that as pe will avoid traditional publishing model and is being made by some of the guys that made ps:t, much of what you liked about ps:t will be in pe... but obsidian clear learned from ps:t. pe has elves and dwarves and classes and many of the "tropes" chrisA wanted to avoid in ps:t. obsidian has learned that you can still make a smarty game when you give folks the trivial stuff they want. make a hero story and focus on protagonist not mean you gotta do in the traditional way, and it not mean you gotta be boring. so give folks what they want... but different and better. oh, and we had to look up "berserk." ... no. just, no. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
PsychoBlonde Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 They've already stated that they want the PC to be "in the wrong place at the wrong time" and "a victim of circumstance" rather than "the chosen one". Although, if you wanted to be a pedant, you could state that they're still chosen--by circumstances. The protagonist is always going to feel somewhat singled out simply because the story is following THEM and not somebody else. At best, you're going to get situations where the reason WHY this person is the protagonist is not stated explicitly and thus there's an implication that somebody else COULD have been the protagonist. Maybe. It's not better or worse one way or the other. It just depends on the particulars of the story. 4 Grand Rhetorist of the Obsidian OrderIf you appeal to "realism" about a video game feature, you are wrong. Go back and try again.
Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Author Posted October 24, 2012 that being said, am guessing that as pe will avoid traditional publishing model and is being made by some of the guys that made ps:t, much of what you liked about ps:t will be in pe... but obsidian clear learned from ps:t. pe has elves and dwarves and classes and many of the "tropes" chrisA wanted to avoid in ps:t. obsidian has learned that you can still make a smarty game when you give folks the trivial stuff they want. make a hero story and focus on protagonist not mean you gotta do in the traditional way, and it not mean you gotta be boring. so give folks what they want... but different and better. I really can't imagine how can You show something new and astonishing using the traditional hero story. I hated this in Dragon Age: Origins too. For some reason I wasn't just some guy who just wanted to save himself and the people close around him, or take revenge for something personal that happened to him. No, basically at the very beginning of the story i set up to save the entire world and everybody was expecting me to do so... Yes, ps:t was much better in this perspective. I guess i am in for a surprise then with p.e. ;-) Oh no, wait. There was this one time... this game, Dreamweb. The hero-setting worked there perfectly! The point of the story was that the player played an assassin for some unknown greater force. (The "keepers of dreams" or something... ) The instructions as who to assassinate next came through hallucinations or dreams, so the player was always left wondering, if the player character went simply mad and is just killing some random people, or these greater forces are for real. oh, and we had to look up "berserk." ... no. just, no. Yes, that's the usual response from the hardcore rpg fan. You are repulsed by the fact that it's a japanese graphic novel and You find it silly. But it's for a different demographic. That's why You have never heard of it and this is why it's redeeming values might have missed your eye. Among these, the most important (in my opinion, that is) are the subtle messages that the story carries are not shallow and not "in your face". The actions and words of the lead character are actually inspiring. His motives are very understandable, there is no "world saving", "enacting justice" or "impressing others" among them. The story doesn't tells you, the reader, that you cannot be a hero in real life, quite the opposite. If you can, please take a look at Chapter 172, pages 8-10. or, equivalently, vol.21. 71-73. and ignore the facts that the world and style are not to your taste. (This is the part, where an antagonist says "you will sacrifice thousands of people to save that which", the crowd shouts out to burn her, and the lead character shouts back to them, saying "all these people gathered together, just because you guys are in trouble, thats why you all pray, you bunch of... you are nothing, but a sacrifice for someone else" and despite the fact that he will indeed sacrifice thousands of people "just" to save someone close to him, he proceeds... i really can't give it back to you here, you have to read it... ) By "it's successful" i meant that it's successful relative to the target demographic. Still, I see no need for the hero-setting, but i guess that's up to the developers anyway and they know their job. Anyway, i am looking forward to a mixture of planescape torment and the baldurs gate series with some new elements in it. ( btw. if you take a look at the polls here: http://www.obsidian.net/ you will see that people expect exactly a mixture of bg and ps:t, and if you look at it, the nameless one was not trying to save the world - just himself - so why not take this approach one step further and go with completely human-like protagonists with understandable goals and motives? )
Gromnir Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 "I really can't imagine how can You show something new and astonishing using the traditional hero story." we stopped with this. lack of imagination is such a terrible burden. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Karkarov Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 if the Average Gamer had bought and liked ps:t, we might not be having this conversation. ps:t did not sell by any measure that were relevant or meaningful in the industry. that being said, am guessing that as pe will avoid traditional publishing model and is being made by some of the guys that made ps:t, much of what you liked about ps:t will be in pe... but obsidian clear learned from ps:t. pe has elves and dwarves and classes and many of the "tropes" chrisA wanted to avoid in ps:t. obsidian has learned that you can still make a smarty game when you give folks the trivial stuff they want. make a hero story and focus on protagonist not mean you gotta do in the traditional way, and it not mean you gotta be boring. so give folks what they want... but different and better. oh, and we had to look up "berserk." Little harsh but nice post. The problem with any forum dedicated to any one developer or game is that most of the people on it don't understand that not everything the dev/game touches is actually gold or a massive success in the grand scheme. Out of curiosity other than the extreme violence and highly adult themes of Berserk (both of which would never work in a American release without seriously being toned down) what was the issue?
JFSOCC Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I'm intrigued. yes. this could work. Remember: Argue the point, not the person. Remain polite and constructive. Friendly forums have friendly debate. There's no shame in being wrong. If you don't have something to add, don't post for the sake of it. And don't be afraid to post thoughts you are uncertain about, that's what discussion is for.---Pet threads, everyone has them. I love imagining Gods, Monsters, Factions and Weapons.
Gromnir Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 if the Average Gamer had bought and liked ps:t, we might not be having this conversation. ps:t did not sell by any measure that were relevant or meaningful in the industry. that being said, am guessing that as pe will avoid traditional publishing model and is being made by some of the guys that made ps:t, much of what you liked about ps:t will be in pe... but obsidian clear learned from ps:t. pe has elves and dwarves and classes and many of the "tropes" chrisA wanted to avoid in ps:t. obsidian has learned that you can still make a smarty game when you give folks the trivial stuff they want. make a hero story and focus on protagonist not mean you gotta do in the traditional way, and it not mean you gotta be boring. so give folks what they want... but different and better. oh, and we had to look up "berserk." Little harsh but nice post. The problem with any forum dedicated to any one developer or game is that most of the people on it don't understand that not everything the dev/game touches is actually gold or a massive success in the grand scheme. Out of curiosity other than the extreme violence and highly adult themes of Berserk (both of which would never work in a American release without seriously being toned down) what was the issue? most of our posts is tending to harsh. oh, and we actual read the first manga issue before we dismissed. the characters is... not. is caricatures. super-powered swordsman with 2 metre i-beam-pretending-to-be-a-sword and bad guy wearing cobra armour drinking blood from severed head at end o' spear? please. scenarios is ridiculous over-the-top. dialogue is forgettable, and story is not near as original as some folks here seem to think. violence doesn't bother us. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Author Posted October 24, 2012 oh, and we actual read the first manga issue before we dismissed. the characters is... not. is caricatures. super-powered swordsman with 2 metre i-beam-pretending-to-be-a-sword and bad guy wearing cobra armour drinking blood from severed head at end o' spear? please. scenarios is ridiculous over-the-top. dialogue is forgettable, and story is not near as original as some folks here seem to think. violence doesn't bother us. Well, yes, but my point was not the big sword. It's a japanese graphic novel. For the japanese. Have you watched japanese commercials? Did you find them over the top? My point was that it's successful and the lead character is very much like a human, not an instrument of fate. (the first volumes are a bit weak by the way. ) An other, western example would be Brandon Lee's Crow, where the main character wants revenge for his loss - not to stop the evil gang, just because they are evil and are causing harm to the people, but for his own revenge. But i better stop now, i started to feel like i'm trolling you guys.
Gromnir Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 "My point was that it's successful and the lead character is very much like a human, not an instrument of fate." you aren't serious, are you? what 'bout the protagonist seems genuine human to you? oh sure, being angry and vengeful is human qualities, but not the way they is done in that manga we read. am not shocked that berserk is successful... in japan. angry hero or anti-hero doesn't necessarily remove us from realm of hero story in any event. angry hero and anti-hero is hardly new. honestly, the odyssey reference we submitted is oddly more remote from the realm o' crpgs. odysseus offends a god and spends 10 years trying to get home. he ian't trying to save world, or revenge himself on a super villain. ultimate solution is not defeating monsters or solving impossible riddle. unlike most homeric characters, odysseus grows. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Pshaw Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I understand your premises but even if you start out from humble beginnings the fact that you have become a key player in a grand story makes you special. In Fallout New Vegas you're just a regular dude, shot and left for dead even, you simply choose to get involved in all this **** that's going on around you. I think that is about a lowly as you can get yet you still get that 'I'm somehow better and more crucial than everybody else' feeling by the end of the game. I understand your desire to play a more anti-hero type character who's not out beat an evil force or fulfill a destiny but is really just trying to get away or get safe. But generally in the end being 'cursed' by the gods is still your characters story being driven by the power of gods so it's not that much different than being chosen. The tone would be darker to be sure but beyond that it's essentially the same. So in the end I guess I'm trying to say humble beginnings or a darker tone to the story won't remove this 'specialness' feeling the surrounds the main character. The only way to do that is to make things more ordinary, remove the struggle almost entirely. I personally feel that a good example of this is the end of Red Dead Redemption where your last handfuls of quests are helping your family around the farm. Then suddenly your old life comes crashing back in with disastrous effect. As fitting as that ending was without the epic bad ass killing spree that was the majority of the game that ending would have fallen flat. I'm personally not interested in a life sim which is basically what you'd have to get if you wanted to remove all of that epic/special feeling from the main character. K is for Kid, a guy or gal just like you. Don't be in such a hurry to grow up, since there's nothin' a kid can't do.
Naesh Posted October 24, 2012 Author Posted October 24, 2012 (edited) "My point was that it's successful and the lead character is very much like a human, not an instrument of fate." you aren't serious, are you? what 'bout the protagonist seems genuine human to you? Rather, the only thing that doesn't seems genuine human to me is his immense strength and that huge kick-ass sword. No, i retract that, there is such a sword actually and i can imagine someone who dedicated his life to it, wield this beauty: The early material that you read was more like an experiment of the author than the legend that it has become. There are two turning points in the story, i guess i should tell you to start reading from vol. 5 or better, from vol 17., if you want to see some improvement in the drawing style and then if you are still interested you can read back. The murder of the cobra-armored badguy simply does not covers just how awesome this story will be later on. Because it gets better - but only if you can stomach the over the top ridiculous style... if you cannot or still find it distasteful or retarded then i am not sure if you should bother. And the fact that there are better stories out there - so what? I wanted to prove a point and this was my example. What i really like is that the main character is just a human. Yes, he wields that huge lump of iron, but there is an attempt to explain that in the story. What i really mean by "is just a human" is that he relies only on his bodily strength, finesse and luck to overcome the situations he gets into, to defeat those inhuman monstrosities. He cuts through the hardships of life with that big sword of his. Even though he makes some serious errors, he realizes these later on so there is some character development too! At the beginning of the story the only motive behind his actions was to survive, he only wanted to stay alive. As the story progresses, he gets betrayed and branded with an inescapable doom. He still pulls through every time somehow and keeps fighting. *This* is what the true face of the human nature looks like! Even if you are struck down by powers unimaginable, you *will* manage to stand up and continue fighting! The point is that he will get to a state, where, by all accounts of greater powers he should be dead, but he isn't. This story tells about the triumph of the human will over fate. At every turn, the reader gets reminded of that in a subtle way. If the main character of Berserk would be the main character of Odyssey, he would go after the heads of the gods armed with a sword and somehow succeed in the end. Compare this sort of character, this sort of story-telling with what we got in the modern rpgs. You are the dragonborn, favored by the gods, so you are meant to stop the world eater. You are a grey warden, so only you can kill the archdemon, good luck with that, you are meant to do that by the way, everybody is expecting that from you. These tales tell about the triumph of destiny over everything else, about how worthless the human will is in the face of the greater powers. And the main character (You) gets to succeed only because of that, since you are the one who is favored by fate. What message does this carries to the real world? Do you really want to play a game what tells you that? angry hero or anti-hero doesn't necessarily remove us from realm of hero story in any event. angry hero and anti-hero is hardly new. Well, if you call what i described before an angry hero or an anti hero, then you are right! But i think there is a substantial difference there! I can picture myself being an anti-hero or an angry hero, whereas i can't picture myself as someone, who has no attachments to life at all - and that's exactly why his desire is to save the world instead of saving himself or his loved ones! Is self-sacrifice really a virtue? Shouldn't we be more humane and rational by sending the message to the player that to him his own life is the most important thing in the world, more important than the life of all the others combined? That he should stand up for his own values, protect the people close to him / her exactly because he places such a high value on himself, not because he is so worthless, selfless and "good"? What really-really bothers me are these type of subtle messages - that tell me that i am worthless in some way, or that i should value someone or something else more than myself! While playing these games i am reminded again and again (in some way that's very hard to notice) that in real life i can achieve nothing, i am not a hero by any measure since i was not born as the chosen one. And as i said before this is a false message, because i am a hero in real life too! ;-) So why not make a change in the way ps:t did and go one step further towards a world full of people? Yes, even your companions can be people and the character you play might not be a machine either! Edited October 24, 2012 by Naesh
Nonek Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 (edited) Try Mask of the Betrayer, New Vegas, the Sith Lords, Alpha Protocol etcetera all from Obsidian, they can be played as a very human anti hero or an outright villain (especially MOTB) so I wouldn't really have any fears for Eternity in this respect. Don't know anything about the oversized swords of jrpg's, but you can get some fairly ridiculously large ones in MOTB if that's your bag. By the way if the gent in the video wants to get through that pallet quicker he might want to use an axe and a prybar, much less effort too. Edited October 24, 2012 by Nonek Quite an experience to live in misery isn't it? That's what it is to be married with children.I've seen things you people can't even imagine. Pearly Kings glittering on the Elephant and Castle, Morris Men dancing 'til the last light of midsummer. I watched Druid fires burning in the ruins of Stonehenge, and Yorkshiremen gurning for prizes. All these things will be lost in time, like alopecia on a skinhead. Time for tiffin. Tea for the teapot!
Gromnir Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) as to the embedded video, we went through 90+ pages o' a really bad comic 'cause we didn't want to dismiss berserk w/o reading. is no way in hell we is gonna get snookered a second and/or third time. HA! Good Fun! Edited October 25, 2012 by Gromnir "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
Naesh Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) as to the embedded video, we went through 90+ pages o' a really bad comic 'cause we didn't want to dismiss berserk w/o reading. is no way in hell we is gonna get snookered a second and/or third time. Dang it. I just re-read vol 17-vol 21 again. You know that what you read was drawn like 25 years ago, right? Whatever, your loss. ) Edited October 25, 2012 by Naesh
Gromnir Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) ... am hearing that this were done, at the very least, decades ago. http://arthistory.ab...jmwt_mma_16.htm this one might even be older... just in case you thinks people is important. http://jackiewhiting.net/ArtHist/SchlAthns.htm HA! good Fun! ps we highly recommend http://www.dccomics....night-returns-0 is also older than "like" 25 years. go figure. Edited October 25, 2012 by Gromnir "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
metiman Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Do all jRPGs have absurdly large and heavy swords or do some use katanas? You would think they would be happy with the sword designs that they themselves (presumably) invented. A two handed slender, curved design has always seemed far better to me than the 1 handed cutlass that Europeans seemed to favor. JoshSawyer: Listening to feedback from the fans has helped us realize that people can be pretty polarized on what they want, even among a group of people ostensibly united by a love of the same games. For us, that means prioritizing options is important. If people don’t like a certain aspect of how skill checks are presented or how combat works, we should give them the ability to turn that off, resources permitting. . .
Naesh Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 Okay. We both know you will get "snookered" again, (from vol 17) when you are bored enough.
Naesh Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) Do all jRPGs have absurdly large and heavy swords or do some use katanas? You would think they would be happy with the sword designs that they themselves (presumably) invented. A two handed slender, curved design has always seemed far better to me than the 1 handed cutlass that Europeans seemed to favor. Most of them are absurdly large swords, yes. Back in college we held some special "who can watch more super-japanese-style movies" competitions. It was a lot of fun, in the weirdest way. Perhaps it was a special kind of self-punishment. You *really* have to see one (no, actually, for the sake of your mental health *do not* see one) to properly get the difference in the western-eastern cultures. Please search youtube for "robo-geisha", watch the trailer. :D Please do so! :D :D :D By the way, i still consider Berserk an awesome fantasy story. It's just from an other culture, that's all. And i guess people will always desire what they can't get. So, jRPG-s will always have absurdly large swords, that cannot be wielded by the japanese. And this explains why katanas are favored by the modders (of skyrim, for example). Edited October 25, 2012 by Naesh
Sedrefilos Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) Don't know about the Berzerk comic but i quit the animated series at the 2nd or 3rd episode due to the usual sexism in anime. In particular, the merchant leader orders his 2nd in command woman (who is presented as too much of a badass until then) to sleep naked with the wounded berzerker for curing purposes, because this is the job women!!! And of course, she obeys... After that i don't really cared about anything else that anime wanted to "say". Hopefully we won't be seeing any of that bullsh it in PE Edited October 25, 2012 by Sedrefilos
Thangorodrim Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 I think that computer games are just a different media to convey the classic hero quest. In centuries past it was the oral storyteller, which then transitioned to the written word, which has now expanded to include the visual media (movies, TV, games, etc). Although there are degrees, the Hero Quest does tend to follow a standard pattern: 1. Call to Action/Adventure - all stories have a beginning. Whether you are Beowulf, Hercules, or some generic bystander you must start in the normal everyday world and then some event or intervention thrusts you into the strange and mystical world of the adventure. Whether it is divine intervention or pure chance doesn't matter; it is only the choice of whether to join the adventure that is important. 2. Trials/Adventure - if you accept the call in step 1 then your trials and adventure begins. This could be just the standard activities of day to day living or the epic hero quest of computer game and literary fame. The key to this stage is growth. The protagonist is growing and developing as the story/trial progresses. 3. Ultimate Challenge - In some adventures (as in life) you are presented with some ultimate challenge (Beowulf vs the Wyrm, Prometheus stealing fire, the Buddha facing the three trials before enlightenment, etc). Although not every story has the same level of ultimate challenge, this is typically the denouement of the story where all the roads converge and you leave the crossroads truly changed (for positive or negative) or you die or you run away (fearing to face the challenge) 4. The reward - if you succeed in the challenge you receive a reward (Godhood in BG2, Enlightenment for the Buddha, etc). This reward is usually life changing and gives the hero great authority or standing with their peers (winning the game ). 5. The return or apotheosis - once you have received your reward you can either return to your fellows and share the reward or you can take the money and run (Apotheosis) ... although the epic hero quest uses this final step it isn't generally used for games (although the different final endings for BG2 definitely give you this choice, even if there is no gameplay subsequent to the choice; to a certain extent the original ending for Fallout 3 kind of met this requirement as well) I see nothing wrong with using the tried and true hero quest model. How you enter the quest and progress is strictly an artistic device. I look forward to see how PE handles the epic hero quest for our character “Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” ― Robert E. Howard
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now